Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Likes, 0 comments z2546917 on j. Exploring the interface between matter and perception, chinese buddhism, daoism, hakka ethnography, and all aspects of radical politics, history, psychology and philosophy – 全世界无产者联合起来. 6k+ following 160 posts @hanhahahaz chase dreams and me @uarkbme 27 @photoshootbyhan i lift too @growwithhan team. 100 followers 240 following 163 posts @menghhhan_words illustration and christianity.

Suy102

Thephantom202

洛杉矶县警方悬赏 2 万美元追查中国留学生庄梦涵（emily king）谋杀案。23 岁的庄梦涵是加州艺术学院大四.. 而在赴美留学后，庄梦涵在个人instagram账号上分享的一系列大尺度照片，引发了对其生前私生活的广泛讨论。 据同学透露，庄梦涵曾在与白人男友交往后.. 4 likes, 0 comments skylinktv on febru 快訊新聞南加州中國女留學生被殺案嫌疑人公佈 為與受害者相識亞裔 洛杉磯縣警局謀殺案調查組正在尋求公眾的幫助，以尋找加州藝術學院（calarts）中國留學生莊夢涵（menghan zhuang，也稱emily king）謀殺案的嫌疑人。 莊夢涵於2月4日晚在newhall的一個公寓.. 目前警方已经发出了通缉令，并悬赏2万美元，希望尽快抓到他。 社交账号曝光随着网友们的高度关注，庄梦涵的社交账号已经被网络福尔摩斯们翻了个底朝天。 她生前的照片如今在网络上被广泛传播，引发了热议。..

Tggp-19

Streamrecorder Io 무료

在加州艺术学院（calarts）就读的23岁中国女留学生庄梦涵（menghan zhuang，音译）在住处被残忍谋杀。2月13日（周四），洛杉矶县警署（lasd）召开记者会宣布，警方暂时将嫌犯锁定为一名与死者相识的二十多岁亚裔男子。警方公布了嫌犯照片并寻求公众提供线索。.. 2026年伊始，习近平抓捕了中共军中最有实权、最具资历和影响力的元老、军委副主席张又侠，在中共政坛投下了一枚政治核弹。事件官宣后，引发了中共政局的剧烈动荡。read more..

Tokupyon Hitomi

庄孟涵（常用英文名为emily king，2001年8月15日2025年2月4日），女，来自浙江温州，中国留学生，生前为加州艺术学院本科四年级学生。庄孟涵在国内某高中国际部毕业，成绩优异且托福满分，后进入加州艺术学院并拿到奖学金。2025年2月4日，洛杉矶警方进行福利检查时发现庄孟涵的遗体，她身上有多, 在加州艺术学院（calarts）就读的23岁中国女留学生庄梦涵（menghan zhuang，音译）在住处被残忍谋杀。2月13日（周四），洛杉矶县警署（lasd）召开记者会宣布，警方暂时将嫌犯锁定为一名与死者相识的二十多岁亚裔男子。警方公布了嫌犯照片并寻求公众提供线索。, Followers, 2 following, 0 posts see instagram photos and videos from 庄梦涵 @zhuangmenghan2.

today's special value qvc Followers, 3 following, 1 posts see instagram photos and videos from 庄梦涵 @z2546917. Kanweng 发表于2025214 1142. 中国学生庄梦涵在洛杉矶被杀，当局正在搜捕嫌疑人 国际新闻. 151 likes, 1 comments hk. When mainland chinese people arrive in the west, usually as students, or sometimes employees, they are usually shellshocked at the very different culture they find – even if the people are kind and considerate. supergrok 디시

thisav 轉左 4 likes, 0 comments skylinktv on febru 快訊新聞南加州中國女留學生被殺案嫌疑人公佈 為與受害者相識亞裔 洛杉磯縣警局謀殺案調查組正在尋求公眾的幫助，以尋找加州藝術學院（calarts）中國留學生莊夢涵（menghan zhuang，也稱emily king）謀殺案的嫌疑人。 莊夢涵於2月4日晚在newhall的一個公寓. Epochtimes on febru 中國女留學生遇害 加州警方鎖定相識亞裔男 在加州藝術學院（calarts）就讀的23歲中國女留學生莊夢涵（menghan zhuang，音譯）在住處被殘忍謀殺。2月13日（周四），洛杉磯縣警署（lasd）召開記者會宣布，警方暫時將疑犯鎖定為一名與死者相識的二十多歲. 中国学生庄梦涵在洛杉矶被杀，当局正在搜捕嫌疑人 国际新闻. 为了保护死者的尊严，庄梦涵的朋友们紧急向instagram申请将其帐户纪念化（memorialize）。 据庄梦涵高中同学时期的同学称，她是个外向善良的女孩，而且很文静， read more. 6k+ following 160 posts @hanhahahaz chase dreams and me @uarkbme 27 @photoshootbyhan i lift too @growwithhan team. ttalang 트위터

tgtube.cp, 加州艺术学院 calarts负责营销和传播的副校长安维恩斯 ann wiens随后证实，庄梦涵为该校大四的本科生，英文名为艾米丽金 emily king。 图源：庄梦涵的ig账号，版权属于原作者。. The suspected male is not the man she shared her accommodation with – and as of posting – the us police have not arrested her boyfriend discussed in most but not all chineselanguage articles covering this story the us coverage is very different to that. 莊夢涵於2月4日晚在newhall的一個公寓內被發現死亡，身上有多處傷痕。當日傍晚警方接報後趕到時，莊夢涵被發現時已無生命跡象。 調查人員發現，一名男子於2月. 6k+ following 160 posts @hanhahahaz chase dreams and me @uarkbme 27 @photoshootbyhan i lift too @growwithhan team. Likes, 0 comments zhuangmenghan9373 on ap. supergrok 검열

steamcommunity히토미 Followers, 2 following, 0 posts see instagram photos and videos from 庄梦涵 @zhuangmenghan2. 100 followers, 185 following, 161 posts menghan zhang @menghhhan_words on instagram illustration and christianity. Com › news › 20250214美警公布中国女留学生遇害案嫌犯 并非网传男友 美国要闻 倍可亲. Followers, 2 following, 0 posts see instagram photos and videos from 庄梦涵 @zhuangmenghan2. 1 likes, 0 comments feiqinstudio on febru focus chinese bloggers collectively humiliated zhuang menghan, a female student from china who was abused and killed.

start-166 Menghan zhang @hanhahahaz. Posts about 庄梦涵 written by adrian 釋大道 proletariat blogging in the heart of uk predatory capitalism. 洛杉矶县警方悬赏 2 万美元追查中国留学生庄梦涵（emily king）谋杀案。23 岁的庄梦涵是加州艺术学院大四. 100 followers 240 following 163 posts @menghhhan_words illustration and christianity. Menghan zhang @hanhahahaz.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.