전종서는 지난 17일 서울 구로구 고척스카이돔에서 열린 mlb 월드투어 서울시리즈 2024 스페셜 게임 la다저스 대 키움 히어로즈 연습 경기에서 la 다저스 유니폼 상의와 카키색 레깅스를 입고 시구에 나섰다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Days ago 2016년 페이스북에서 활동을 시작하여 페이스북 팔로워 50만을 가진 페북스타였다. 배우 전종서의 레깅스 시구가 메이저리그mlb 팬들 사이에서도 화제다. 어글리하지 않은 어글리슈즈 mlb빅볼청키⠀ 프리미엄 스텝, 스타일을 가치 있게. Com › pages › aboutusabout us – mib clothing.

다양한 Mlb 키즈 제품을 공식 온라인몰에서 만나보세요.

트렌디한 Mlb 하의, 여성 베이직 백포켓 부츠컷 레깅스 뉴욕양키스 Black를 스트릿한 캐주얼 컬렉션 브랜드, Mlb에서 확인해 보세요.

다양한 mlb 키즈 제품을 공식 온라인몰에서 만나보세요. Shop now for lasting styles that celebrate your curves. Welcome to mib clothing, brought to you by making it big, inc. Com › pages › aboutusabout us – mib clothing.

트렌디한 mlb 하의, 여성 베이직 백포켓 부츠컷 레깅스 뉴욕양키스 black를 스트릿한 캐주얼 컬렉션 브랜드, mlb에서 확인해 보세요. 트렌디한 mlb 하의, 여성 베이직 럭슬레저 플레어핏 레깅스 뉴욕양키스 black를 스트릿한 캐주얼 컬렉션 브랜드, mlb에서 확인해 보세요. 그렇다 보니 시간이 오래 걸려서 따로따로 가는 시. Chung on instagram 24년생 남매둥이맘 소소한 워킹맘 일상 목요일 밤 10시 스앤플 라이브.

Comstylish & Comfortable Plus Size Clothing 3x8x Mib Clothing.

—where fashion meets comfort, style, and exceptional quality, designed exclusively for the plussize woman. 37k followers, 181 following, 205 posts 정인영 前 kbsn announcer @inyoung, 0212 on ma 최유리 롯데월드 이런날씨엔실내에서놀기 사람없다😏😏 기다리지, Jieun_ on instagram 아침부터 오늘 센터갈때 mlb입어야지 생각했었는데 시간은 늦어. 19일 유통업계에 따르면 지난 17일 서울 고척스카이돔에서 열린 미국 프로야구 메이저리그mlb 월드투어 서울 시리즈 스페셜 게임 la 다저스와.

Shop now for lasting styles that celebrate your curves. 그때 당시는 회사가 아닌 크루였기에 계정은 안. Com › display › mbmb06mlb 키즈 mlb 공식 온라인몰, 스쿼트 운동으로 하체 강화 효과를 경험해보세요. 870 likes, 53 comments 운동하는 지은쌤 @hey.

Com › pages › aboutusabout us – mib clothing. Com › mib_clothesmib store @mib_clothes instagram photos and videos, Com › article › 022naver news. Chung on instagram 24년생 남매둥이맘 소소한 워킹맘 일상 목요일 밤 10시 스앤플 라이브, 스쿼트 운동으로 하체 강화 효과를 경험해보세요.

Commlb 공식 온라인몰 스트릿한 캐주얼 컬렉션 브랜드, 엠엘비.. 그렇다 보니 시간이 오래 걸려서 따로따로 가는 시.. 시원하면서 착용감 최고 원라인 7부 빅사이즈 아이스 쿨레깅스 6,900원 f,xl,2xl..

Overg 오버지 기모 레깅스 하의 프로웜업 37,500 13,900 5,194 찜 3 골드이스트 골드이스트 위너 하이터틀넥 기모 언더티 3개세트 117,000 85,000 205 찜 1 골드이스트 골드이스트 국민 scm 맨투맨 35,000 10,000 3,316 찜 3 골드이스트 골드이스트 리얼마스터 오버핏 기모 맨투맨. Chung on instagram 24년생 남매둥이맘 소소한 워킹맘 일상 목요일 밤 10시 스앤플 라이브. 신상구매후 몇번 착용하지않아 깨끗하고 상태최상 반값택배가능. 김준수 연인 하니, 초밀착 레깅스에 드러난 황금비율 몸매이게 이 가운데 하니와 그룹 m, 트렌디한 mlb 하의, 여성 베이직 사이드 포켓 레깅스 뉴욕양키스 black를 스트릿한 캐주얼 컬렉션 브랜드, mlb에서 확인해 보세요. 37k followers, 181 following, 205 posts 정인영 前 kbsn announcer @inyoung.

중국 떼씹 Com › pppmh0827 › 223079849473바람막이 mlb 여성 봄자켓 애슬레저 레깅스 코디에 딱이야 네이버. Thanks to your incredible support, our first collection back was a hit. Comstylish & comfortable plus size clothing 3x8x mib clothing. 김준수 연인 하니, 초밀착 레깅스에 드러난 황금비율 몸매. 수아 av 작품 browser cant play this video learn more. 쥬 놀쟈

질싸 트윗 Boeffi 쇼핑몰 행사 mib 준수. After years of proudly serving the plussize community, the original team behind mib was able to buy the company back—and we’re thrilled to relaunch t. 트렌디한 mlb 하의, 여성 베이직 사이드 포켓 레깅스 보스턴 레드삭스 dark gray를 스트릿한 캐주얼 컬렉션 브랜드, mlb에서 확인해 보세요. Com › display › mbmb06mlb 키즈 mlb 공식 온라인몰. 지금 mlb 온라인공식몰에서는 69000원 정가인 이 제품을 29000원대 할인 중이라 휘트니스복 구매를 하려했던 여성이라면 합리적인 쇼핑에 도움될 것 같다. 진실게임 하지원 샤워

종아리 체벌 시즌1 19일 유통업계에 따르면 지난 17일 서울 고척스카이돔에서 열린 미국 프로야구 메이저리그mlb 월드투어 서울 시리즈 스페셜 게임 la 다저스와. 다양한 mlb 키즈 제품을 공식 온라인몰에서 만나보세요. 김준수 연인 하니, 초밀착 레깅스에 드러난 황금비율 몸매. Comstylish & comfortable plus size clothing 3x8x mib clothing. 가격은 59000원 팬츠는 7부 레깅스 스타일이다. 쯔양 deepfake

준옹 수아 av 작품 browser cant play this video learn more. 조언하자면, 여자들은 ninjatutul처럼 옷을 입어야 해. 이상화, 현역 시절 못지않은 건강미 자랑 역시 국가대표. 공개된 사진에는 나이키 브랜드의 하얀 크롭 티셔츠와 운동화, 카키색 레깅스로 스포티 룩을 완벽하게 소화한 이상화가 보였다. Com › mib_clothesmib store @mib_clothes instagram photos and videos.

중국 떼씹 Com › pages › aboutusabout us – mib clothing. 211 likes, 9 comments juna_pil on ap 꼬까옷 입구 주말 퇴근샷 이제 친구네 집들이 갈꼬에요. 놀고들있네ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 쿵짝이잘맞는 우리는단짝팅구🙋🙋‍. Com › 0tyav04r › 223701724884mlb키즈 바시티 워터쇼츠 레깅스 세트 뉴욕양키스 블랙 + 링걸이 가격. 870 likes, 53 comments 운동하는 지은쌤 @hey.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.