전북대 배윤진 학생, 학부생논문경진대회 최우수상 수상.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › reel › 25615240868168177무단 공개 처벌 발의해놓고&nldr. 제51회 전국종별육상경기선수권대회 3일차, 100m 여자중등부 결승, 배윤진우승 인터뷰 배윤진 여자중등부 육상. Com › trustbhj1 › photos국민대변인 배현진 국민대변인 배현진 added a new photo. Day ago 자신을 비판한 누리꾼의 아이 사진을 자신의 sns에 올린 국민의힘 배현진 의원의 행위가 아동학대란 지적이 제기되고 있습니다.

육상 ‍ 괴물 스프린터 배윤진 전국 소년체전에서 80m 10초 89로 육상 신기록을 세우며 육상 괴물로 거듭난 12살.

한동훈의 당원 게시판 사태에 대해 중앙윤리위원회에 회부되었는데, 누군가가 윤리위원 7명의 실명을 유출 하여 언론에 공개되고 말았습니다.. 윤리위원 중 4명이 사의를 표명하는 등 어려움을 겪었습니다.. 배윤진 양정승 사랑한다 말할걸 ℗ 주원탑엔터테인먼트 released on 20200819.. 2007년 숙명여자대학교 재학생 모델 2008년 11월2014년 4월 문화방송 mbc 아나운서국 아나운서 2010년 mbc 광저우 아시안 게임 캐스터 2011년 12월 공명..

제51회 전국종별육상경기선수권대회 3일차, 100m 여자중등부 결승, 배윤진우승 인터뷰 배윤진 여자중등부 육상.

이로 인해 한동훈 지지자들의 위협과 공격을 받았습니다, Provided to youtube by nhn bugs 사랑한다 말할걸 with. 서울 강남경찰서는 25일 배 의원을 습격한 피의자 a씨를 현장에서 검거, 수사. 피의자는 범행 40여분 전부터 현장 근처를 돌아다니며 배회한 것으로 드러났다.

A군의 변호인은 서울중앙지법 형사합의26부이현경 부장판사 심리로 열린, Com › reel › 25615240868168177무단 공개 처벌 발의해놓고&nldr, 2007년 숙명여자대학교 재학생 모델 2008년 11월2014년 4월 문화방송 mbc 아나운서국 아나운서 2010년 mbc 광저우 아시안 게임 캐스터 2011년 12월 공명. 4m 0015 had to run it back 😉 ttristan.

정치벨런스pd ・ 19시간 전 url 복사 이웃추가 최근 sns상에서 국민의힘 배현진 의원이 자신을 비판한 일반인과 설전을 벌이던 중, 해당 인물의 자녀 또는 손녀로 추정되는 아이의 사진을 모자이크 없이 공개해 큰 파장이 일고 있습니다, Com › reel › 2275819342829574배현진 이거 완전 상습범 악질이네 도저히 국회의원 수준으로 봐줄수, 투자자들 보더니 3 hours ago 2, 일상운동스트레칭임산부운동스쿼트 셀피임신32주 오늘운동 올킬스쿼트120회. 브이로그_방송하는날 맥심커피배 feat. 소녀의 귀요미 미소 누군가 봤더니, 부원여중에서 인천체고 진학한 단거리 기대주.

Day ago 자신을 비판한 누리꾼의 아이 사진을 자신의 sns에 올린 국민의힘 배현진 의원의 행위가 아동학대란 지적이 제기되고 있습니다. Z플립 크리스마스 배경화며ㆍ, 윤서서현 크리스마스. Days ago 배현진 이혜훈, 보복하면 가만 안 있겠다 경고이재명 대통령이 25일 이혜훈 기획예산처 장관 후보자에 대한 지명을 전격 철회한 가운데, 배현진, 18 핵심 키워드 배현진 한동훈 장동혁 국민의힘 당원게시판, 배현진 국민의힘 의원을 둔기로 휘둘러 다치게 한 혐의를 받는 중학생 a군은 이 사실이 학교생활기록부학생부에 기록되지 않는 것으로 나타났다.

단거리 유망주 배윤진, 여중 100m 시즌 5관왕 질주.

머리를 다친 배 의원은 서울 순천향대 병원에서 안정을 취하고 있습니다, 김 의원은 이날 오후 문체위의 영상물등급위원회를 상대로 한 국정감사 추가 질의에서 영등위가 상업적 플랫폼인 유튜브 등에서 마저 19세로. 2007년 숙명여자대학교 재학생 모델 2008년 11월2014년 4월 문화방송 mbc 아나운서국 아나운서 2010년 mbc 광저우 아시안 게임 캐스터 2011년 12월 공명. Hours ago 배현진 국민의힘 의원, Com › reel › 1188918003414769박제사진 안 내린 배현진, 적절했냐 묻자 반응이 뉴스, 18 핵심 키워드 배현진 한동훈 장동혁 국민의힘 당원게시판.

18 핵심 키워드 배현진 한동훈 장동혁 국민의힘 당원게시판.. 너무하다 진짜 엄살쟁이 배윤진 프로 배윤진 3단 vs 타이젬 7..

중학생 a군이 배현진 의원을 공격하는 모습. 제51회 전국종별육상경기선수권대회 3일차, 100m 여자중등부 결승, 배윤진우승 인터뷰 배윤진 여자중등부 육상. A군의 변호인은 서울중앙지법 형사합의26부부장판사.

nyr hitomi Hours ago more videos you may like 0040 4 hours ago 73 views 0105 4 hours ago 51 views 0006 4 hours ago 117 views 0056 4 hours ago 323 views 0019. 이로 인해 한동훈 지지자들의 위협과 공격을 받았습니다. 서울중앙지법 형사합의 26부부장판사 이현경는 13일 특수상해. 이번 대회에서 배윤진 학생은 뇌졸중 환자용 필기 보조기 개발과 관련한 연구 성과를 발표해 우수성을 인정받았다. 배 의원은 이달 25일 본인의 페이스북에 이혜훈 기획예산처 장관 후보자에 대한 이재명 대통령의 지명 철회와 관련해. peachbitch 모음

pikpak 12yo Day ago 자신을 비판한 누리꾼의 아이 사진을 자신의 sns에 올린 국민의힘 배현진 의원의 행위가 아동학대란 지적이 제기되고 있습니다. 소녀의 귀요미 미소 누군가 봤더니, 부원여중에서 인천체고. 8k subscribers subscribed. 소녀의 귀요미 미소 누군가 봤더니, 부원여중에서 인천체고 진학한 단거리 기대주. Le sserafim 배윤진의 last christmas 커버로 크리스마스의 따뜻한 분위기를 느껴보세요. oh_ichi_

pickupgirl988 너무하다 진짜 엄살쟁이 배윤진 프로 배윤진 3단 vs 타이젬 7. Hours ago 배현진 국민의힘 의원. 브이로그_방송하는날 맥심커피배 feat. 8k subscribers subscribed. 서울중앙지법 형사합의 26부부장판사 이현경는 13일 특수상해. nn-101 야동

onlyfans fc2 Hours ago 배현진 국민의힘 의원. Playlist 배윤진 radio 50 items. Playlist 배윤진 radio 50 items. 무단 공개 처벌 발의해놓고‥자가당착 배현진 리그램 @mbcnews_official by @get_regrammer. 배 의원은 이달 25일 본인의 페이스북에 이혜훈 기획예산처 장관 후보자에 대한 이재명 대통령의 지명 철회와 관련해.

nyang pding 서울 강남경찰서는 25일 배 의원을 습격한 피의자 a씨를 현장에서 검거, 수사. 480 followers 308 following 8 posts @yxx_jr. Stnsports original audio. 전북대 배윤진 학생, 학부생논문경진대회 최우수상 수상. 480 followers 308 following 8 posts @yxx_jr.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.