황제성도 라디오 스타에 출연해 박나래 술버릇에 피해를 입은.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

박나래, 술버릇 폭로 또 터졌다남자 연예인 앞에서 상의탈의. 애주가로 유명한 박나래는 그간 방송에서 술버릇이 여러 차례 언급된 바 있다. 개그우먼 박나래가 각종 의혹으로 방송 활동을 중단한 가운데, 과거 예능 프로그램에서 언급했던 자신의 술버릇 관련 발언이 다시 온라인상에서 주목. 심지어 동생에게 욕하며 마시는데 그게.

황제성도 라디오 스타에 출연해 박나래 술버릇에 피해를 입은.. Kr 모든걸 알고 있던 이경규의 이이경, 박나래 예언 광고의 모든것 2h󰞋󱟠 󳄫..

박나래의 주사를 들은 이영자는 미친x 아니냐며 박나래 인기는 여기서 멈춰야겠다라고 경악해 눈길을 끌었다.

Com › Board › View싱글벙글 박나래 술버릇에 충격받은 신동엽 실시간 베스트 갤러리.

박나래 전 매니저들은 지난 12월 3일 서울서부지법에 부동산가압류신청을 제기했다.

술 좀 마신다는 사람들이 흔히 자기 얼마나 마신다 자기는 마시고 다음날 쌩쌩하다 자랑하는건 봤어도 지가 술먹고 깽판친다는 자랑은 하기기 쉽지 않은데 read more, 나래바에서 하룻밤을 보낸 이효리는 이튿날 박나래의 술버릇을 공개했다. 박나래, 소름 돋는 술주정 파묘母 발언 보니 논현일보. 박나래의 주사를 들은 이영자는 미친x 아니냐며 박나래 인기는 여기서 멈춰야겠다라고 경악해 눈길을 끌었다. 박나래, 소름 돋는 술주정 파묘母 발언 보니 논현일보. 개그우먼 박나래가 각종 의혹으로 방송 활동을 중단한 가운데.

나혼산 멤버였던 기안84 생일파티때 박나래 초대 안한이유이시언도 두려워하는 무시무시한 박나래의 유명한 술버릇 주사때문. 주사 때문에 클럽서 쫓겨나기도박나래, 술버릇 어땠길래. 박나래 문서의 술버릇 문단에도 나오지만, 박나래는 술버릇이 매우 좋지 않다고 한다.

채권자는 박나래 매니저들로, 이들은 박나래로부터 업무비 정산을.. 와이프 친한 언니중에 폭음하는년 있는데 시발진짜 술을 잘먹는다고 지입으로 떠드는데 술을존나처먹고 기절해버림.. 1일 한 매체 보도에 따르면 박나래의 전 매니저 a씨는 경찰에 상해진단서와 치료확인서를 제출했다..

나혼산 멤버였던 기안84 생일파티때 박나래 초대 안한이유이시언도 두려워하는 무시무시한 박나래의 유명한 술버릇 주사때문.

박나래 전 매니저들은 지난 12월 3일 서울서부지법에 부동산가압류신청을 제기했다. 우리끼리 웃자고 한 이야기라며 급히 상황을 수습했다, 박나래 전 매니저들은 지난 12월 3일 서울서부지법에 부동산가압류신청을 제기했다. 방송불가 술버릇, 만취 에피소드 총정리 네이버 블로그 블챌 왓츠인마이블로그 158개의 글 목록열기, ‘나혼자산다’ 게시판에는 박나래 하차를 요구하는 글이 쏟아졌고, 성희롱을 가볍게 소비해온 예능의 구조적 문제와 더불어, 박나래 본인의 개그 스타일이 남성 대상 성희롱을 당연시해온 것 아니냐는 비판이 이어졌습니다. 박나래 자기 술버릇 최악인건 이미 알고 있었고 그럼에도 고치지 않은건 도 자기가 힘이 있다는걸 아니까 더 즐기고 폭주 했을테고.

di 게임 사이트 이러한 가운데 그의 모친까지 술주정을 토로해 이목을 모은다. 13일 유튜브 채널 나래식에는 오빠가 이래서 우리가 손절설이 돌잖아. Com › plug_and_play_life › 224098769264박나래, 성희롱 논란 재조명되는 충격적인 술버릇 네이버 블로그. 13일 유튜브 채널 나래식에는 오빠가 이래서 우리가 손절설이 돌잖아. 채권자는 박나래 매니저들로, 이들은 박나래로부터 업무비 정산을. dp henta

dotsuco hitomi 개그우먼 박나래가 각종 의혹으로 방송 활동을 중단한 가운데. 채권자는 박나래 매니저들로, 이들은 박나래로부터 업무비 정산을. 방송불가 술버릇, 만취 에피소드 총정리 네이버 블로그 블챌 왓츠인마이블로그 158개의 글 목록열기. 본인이 주사 심하다고 라스같은데 나와서 손절당한 썰 풀기도 했음. 방송인 박나래를 둘러싼 전 매니저와의 진실 공방이 이어지는 가운데, 과거 방송과 인터뷰에서 언급됐던 그의 술자리 일화들이 다시 주목받고 있다. dorm room sex gifs

di겜 다운로드 주사 때문에 클럽서 쫓겨나기도박나래, 술버릇 어땠길래. 서울서부지법은 지난 3일 박나래 명의 부동산에 대한 가압류 신청을 접수했다. P17863 exceptionalpost. 그러던 중 박나래는 2021년 3월 25일 밤 인스타그램 계정에 자필 사과문을 올렸습니다. Com › plug_and_play_life › 224098769264박나래, 성희롱 논란 재조명되는 충격적인 술버릇 네이버 블로그. egentai gender

erome 년생 싱글벙글 박나래 술버릇에 충격받은 신동엽 실시간 베스트. 더 거슬러 올라가면 박나래 스스로 언급했던 술버릇 고백도 있다. 심지어 동료 남자 연예인들을 성추행한다는 증언이 나올 정도이다. 박나래 예능 인생을 송두리째 흔드는 상황이었습니다. 박나래 전 매니저들은 지난 12월 3일 서울서부지법에 부동산가압류신청을 제기했다.

dfake.me 13일 나래식 채널에는 손절설 해명, 결혼 조언 그리고 기안84라는 제목의 영상이 공개됐다. 16 0831 박나래 술버릇 미친x 인기 여기서 멈춰야 해. Com › plug_and_play_life › 224098769264박나래, 성희롱 논란 재조명되는 충격적인 술버릇 네이버 블로그. 이거는 버튼 한번만 띡 누르면 머리카락이 read more. 작년 한 방송에 출연한 박 씨의 어머니는 한.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.