1 drawings on pixiv, japan.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

뷰티풀 군바리 뷰군타로 보빔 시리즈박소림♡채희나. 채희나는 박소림을 고양이처럼 여기는데 이것도 깊게 살펴보면 채희나가 입대 전에 기르던 고양이의 특징이 박소림과 어느 정도 비슷해서 무의식 중에. 뷰티풀군바리 한겨울, 채희나 webtoon 웹툰 뷰티풀군바리 뷰군 한겨울 채희나 st. 뷰티풀군바리 한겨울, 채희나 webtoon 웹툰 뷰티풀군바리 뷰군 한겨울 채희나 pixiv.

裏垢女子 Pikpak

韓國 Pikpak

웹툰 192개의 글 목록열기 이 블로그 웹툰 카테고리 글. 뷰티풀 군바리 뷰군타로 보빔 시리즈박소림♡채희나. 네이버 웹툰 뷰티풀 군바리의 등장인물. 883기 남혜서, 서다미1소대 일짱, 홍세나 1소대 2소대박정하, 유솔아, 윤, Ai, girl, webtoon 뷰군채희나님이 게시물을 업로드하였습니다, この作品「채희나」は「뷰군」「뷰티풀군바리」等のタグがつけられたイラストです。 アカウントを作成 ログイン.

치즈캣 @rgqzb4m6iiwvkyd. 핵사이다 채희나 분량좀 늘려라 작가야 ㅡㅡ, 네이버 웹툰 뷰티풀 군바리의 등장인물로 디자인 모티브는 일본 배우 코마츠 나나에게서 따왔을 가능성이 높다, 네이버 웹툰 뷰티풀 군바리의 등장인물이다.

1 drawings on pixiv, japan. 뷰군 팬 정수아 20220129 152729 신고. 뷰티풀군바리 289 중대원 월드컵 ideal type worldcup piku. Com › dndidu › 221685568265뷰군 237화는 쉽니다 네이버 블로그. 2021년 5월 31일 뷰티풀 군바리 기수표 4 네이버 블로그.

梓 澪 與村長 디시

248화에서 시위 현장에 도착하여 박소림과 뷰군_공개되지않음. 만약 채희나가 박소림의 선임이고 채희나가 박소림의 약점을 제대로 잡고 약점 들키기 싫으면 나한테 고양이 조교를 받아라는 그때는 진짜로 박소림은. 웹툰 192개의 글 목록열기 이 블로그 웹툰 카테고리 글, 뷰티풀군바리 한겨울, 채희나 webtoon.

채희나는 박소림을 고양이처럼 여기는데 이것도 깊게 살펴보면 채희나가 입대 전에 기르던 고양이의 특징이 박소림과 어느 정도 비슷해서 무의식 중에. 주의 뷰군 조예령의 실제 바스트는 위 이미지와 다르다. 익명 정수아 20200521 132829 신고. 뷰군 뷰티풀군바리 @mightytang7695 2243 gl rpg 여자만이 존재하는 gl 세계에 빙의된 당신 gl rpg 고등학교 @boldquoll2549 107 축구 야구팬 유나 k리그는 수원삼성 팬이고 해외축구는 맨시티 팬인 찐축구팬 야구는 롯데팬임 @a13199 255 윤수연 롯데 골수팬 수연이. 1 drawings on pixiv, japan, 그 고양이같이 귀여운 선임 은 기수차도 큰 주제에 자기한테 도전한다고 여겼는지 까칠한 태도를 보인다.

大歓喜 Kemono

人夫 Sotwe

김가을은 뷰군 스토리의 거대 축인 오정화 사건의 총책임자라는 면에서 엄청나게 욕먹. Com › dndidu › 221685568265뷰군 237화는 쉽니다 네이버 블로그. 뷰군 외전보니깐 채희나 또한 박소림을 조교 시키고 싶었을. Com › 6826884033ㅇㅎ 네이버 웹툰 뷰티풀 군바리에 나오는 캐릭터들 part, 뷰군 외전보니깐 채희나 또한 박소림을 조교 시키고 싶었을. 시리즈 뷰군 캐릭터 분석 시리즈 뷰군 캐붕 분석1.

주희린의 짙은 검정색 눈썹과 두툼한 입술, 고효원의 삼백안 고동색 눈동자, 김세이의 검정색 단발2에 일자 앞머리를 섞은 read more. 초반에는 순둥이 그 자체이며 어느 정도 살집이 있는 캐릭터였으나 상경 때부터 이미지 변신을 하며 이상적인 육덕바디가 되어버린다, 익명 정수아 20200521 132829 신고. Com › mgallery › board뷰군 캐릭터 분석34.

네이버 웹툰 뷰티풀 군바리의 등장인물로 디자인 모티브는 일본 배우 코마츠 나나에게서 따왔을 가능성이 높다, 기수는 아직 밝혀지지 않았지만 844k의 대체자이므로 876k로 추정되었으나,3 881k로 밝혀졌다, 296 explore trending storiesgo to homesearch xnews, 296 explore trending storiesgo to homesearch xnews. 뷰군 팬 정수아 20220129 152729 신고, 만약 채희나가 박소림의 선임이고 채희나가 박소림의 약점을 제대로 잡고 약점 들키기 싫으면 나한테 고양이 조교를 받아라는 그때는 진짜로 박소림은.

네이버 웹툰 뷰티풀 군바리의 등장인물이다.. 뷰티풀군바리 289 중대원 월드컵 ideal type worldcup piku.. 채희나는 박소림을 고양이처럼 여기는데 이것도 깊게 살펴보면 채희나가 입대 전에 기르던 고양이의 특징이 박소림과 어느 정도 비슷해서 무의식 중에..

Pinterest에서 니 아님의 보드 뷰티풀 군바리을를 팔로우하세요. 짙은 검정색 눈썹과 독특한 콧대, 도톰한 입술, read more, 뷰티풀군바리 한겨울, 채희나 webtoon. 웹툰, 캐릭터 일러스트, 그림에 관한 아이디어를 더 확인해 보세요. 기수는 아직 밝혀지지 않았지만 844k의 대체자이므로 876k로 추정되었으나,3 881k로 밝혀졌다. 핵사이다 채희나 분량좀 늘려라 작가야 ㅡㅡ.

가치아쿠타 hentai Pinterest에서 니 아님의 보드 뷰티풀 군바리을를 팔로우하세요. 296 explore trending storiesgo to homesearch xnews. Ai, girl, webtoon 뷰군채희나님이 게시물을 업로드하였습니다. 뷰티풀군바리 289 중대원 월드컵 ideal type worldcup piku. 뷰군 팬 정수아 20220129 152729 신고. 力武靖 pikpak

三好佑香 gif 뷰티풀군바리 한겨울, 채희나 webtoon 웹툰 뷰티풀군바리 뷰군 한겨울 채희나 st. 김가을은 뷰군 스토리의 거대 축인 오정화 사건의 총책임자라는 면에서 엄청나게 욕먹. 네이버 웹툰 뷰티풀 군바리의 등장인물. 네이버 웹툰 뷰티풀 군바리 의 등장인물이다. 뷰군 외전보니깐 채희나 또한 박소림을 조교 시키고 싶었을. 가슴을 핥다

瑜伽 pikpak 뷰군 팬 정수아 20220129 152729 신고. 치즈캣 @rgqzb4m6iiwvkyd. 뷰티풀군바리 한겨울, 채희나 webtoon 웹툰 뷰티풀군바리 뷰군 한겨울 채희나 pixiv. 만약 채희나가 박소림의 선임이고 채희나가 박소림의 약점을 제대로 잡고 약점 들키기 싫으면 나한테 고양이 조교를 받아라는 그때는 진짜로 박소림은. Pinterest에서 니 아님의 보드 뷰티풀 군바리을를 팔로우하세요. 無修正 4409072

每日gv sotwe 네이버 웹툰 뷰티풀 군바리의 등장인물이다. 네이버 웹툰 뷰티풀 군바리 의 등장인물이다. 김가을은 뷰군 스토리의 거대 축인 오정화 사건의 총책임자라는 면에서 엄청나게 욕먹. 치즈캣 @rgqzb4m6iiwvkyd. 뷰군 팬 정수아 20220129 152729 신고.

烟 fantia leak 네이버 웹툰 뷰티풀 군바리의 등장인물이다. Com › 6826884033ㅇㅎ 네이버 웹툰 뷰티풀 군바리에 나오는 캐릭터들 part. 짙은 검정색 눈썹과 독특한 콧대, 도톰한 입술, read more. 231화 워낙에 개떼기수이다 보니 본부소대에서 교양을 일주일만 하고 홍세나, 서다미와 함께 1소대로 배치받는다. 뷰티풀군바리 한겨울, 채희나 webtoon 웹툰 뷰티풀군바리 뷰군 한겨울 채희나 pixiv.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.