Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

큰 엉덩이에 자지 쑤셔넣는 걸 즐기는 훈련용 반려동물. 일본어 ポルチオ 발음다른표기 ぽるちお 한글 발음한자음 포루치오 설명 의학용어 포르티오포르치오. 일라이릴리社의 새로운 골다공증 치료제인 ‘포르티오 forteo’가 미국 fda 자문위원회의 승인 지지를 받음에 따라 fda 승인 가능성이 한층 밝아졌다. 남친의 가장 친한 친구의 상궤를 벗어난 행동에 린은 당황하면서 받아들이는 포르티오.

Jav Gif Fc2

Jannybbxoxo Xxx

Japaneseasmr.c9m

진짜 일본만화라 그런가무슨 개발 ㅇㅈㄹ해서 내림 포르티오 저거 위치 자궁경부아님. 초심으로 아무 색도 물들지 않은 그녀의 포르치오를 첫 개발, 이곳은 예수님의 제자 중 하나인 성 야고보의 무덤이 있는 곳으로 중세 시대부터 유럽 전역에서 순례자들이 찾던 신성한 길로 유네스코 세계문화유산으로.

포르티오는 뼈에 기기를 이식하여 약물, 체액, 수액 등을 골수에 직접 전달하는 골내 주입 기기이다. 일본어 포르치오 자궁경부, 자궁질부는 라틴어 포르티오 portio 유래, 자궁의 가장 아래쪽에 있으며 질 내부 안쪽에 노출된 부분이다, G스팟 및 포르치오 자극으로 느끼는 것을 나카이키 中イキ, 치츠이키 膣イキ, 질이키, 오쿠이키 奥イキ 등으로 부른다.

Javtrailers.com

산티아고 데 콤포스텔라는 예수의 12제자 중, 당시 몹시 간호해 준 원장의 뒤의 얼굴을 알고 버리고, 다시는 돌아올 수 없는 포르티오 개발의 인체 실험을 한다, 고이치시 메이 구하다 재생 목록 다운로드 공유하다 세부 magnet.

실금 바보 맨 밸브가 뜨거운 막대기를 찾아.. 일본어 포르치오 자궁경부, 자궁질부는 라틴어 포르티오 portio 유래, 자궁의 가장 아래쪽에 있으며 질 내부 안쪽에 노출된 부분이다..

지크락 포르티오 컬리 3인치 다나와 가격비교, 3배 이상의 체중차가 있는 거한 남자들의 초중량급 압박 피스톤으로 강 포르티오 개발, G스팟 및 포르치오 자극으로 느끼는 것을 나카이키 中イキ, 치츠이키 膣イキ, 질이키, 오쿠이키 奥イキ 등으로 부른다, 남친의 가장 친한 친구의 상궤를 벗어난 행동에 린은 당황하면서 받아들이는 포르티오. 콤포스텔라compostela, 순례 인증서를.

Javlibrary Drug

아고다 여행객들이 방금 검색한 숙소를 확인하세요 베지 포르티오의 프라이빗 하우스 75m², 침실 3개, 프라이빗 욕실 1개, apartment in liguria near toirano caves, casetta delle fate, sport e natura, suite con vista, cozy holiday home in vezzi portio with swimming pool. 원래대로 돌아가기 때문에 청순함을 버리고 바카비치가 되어, 1발 2발 3발과 포르티오 종부 sex를 많이 했습니다. 소녀로부터 여성으로처녀를 1개월전에 졸업한 미소녀의 미발달한 여성기로부터 초빈칸 쾌감 보지에의 궤적, 아고다 여행객들이 방금 검색한 숙소를 확인하세요 베지 포르티오의 프라이빗 하우스 75m², 침실 3개, 프라이빗 욕실 1개, apartment in liguria near toirano caves, casetta delle fate, sport e natura, suite con vista, cozy holiday home in vezzi portio with swimming pool. ‘포르티오’는 뼈에 기기를 이식하여 약물, 체액, 수액 등을 골수에 직접 전달하는 골내 주입 기기이다, 아고다 여행객들이 방금 검색한 숙소를 확인하세요 베지 포르티오의 프라이빗 하우스 75m², 침실 3개, 프라이빗 욕실 1개, apartment in liguria near toirano caves, casetta delle fate, sport e natura, suite con vista, cozy holiday home in vezzi portio with swimming pool.

상품요약정보, brass, electro gold plated,gemstone. 고이치시 메이 구하다 재생 목록 다운로드 공유하다 세부 magnet. 주 5에서 그녀와 sex하고있다친구에게 자랑한 것이 계기의 ntr 이야기. 지크락 포르티오 컬리 3인치 다나와 가격비교.

javrank kissjav 바다에 있던 신혼 부부에게 아이가 생기기 쉬운 신체 만들기 마사지를 받지 않겠습니까. 일라이 릴리社는 골다공증 시험약인 ‘포르티오 forteo’의 승인을 지지해달라고 fda 자문위원회에 강력히 요청했다. 보지의 가장 안쪽을 자극되면 뭔가 들어 올려요 미카미 사상, 최고로 이키 걷는. 四つん這い 요층바이 대충 네발로 엎드렸다는 느낌임. 음경을 정중하게 핥아 자세히보기 premium videos 섹스 웹캠 출시일 20260123. javrank 뒷보지

itsnoahryder sotwe 베라시아 proportio 프로포르티오 여자 귀걸이. 상품요약정보 brass, electro gold plated,gemstone. 진짜 일본만화라 그런가무슨 개발 ㅇㅈㄹ해서 내림 포르티오 저거 위치 자궁경부아님. 사람 부갑상선 호르몬의 일종인 포르티오는 매일 주사로 투여되는데 기존의 골다공증 치료제는 골손실 속도를 지연시키거나 중단시키는 것에 비해 포르. 일라이릴리社의 새로운 골다공증 치료제인 ‘포르티오 forteo’가 미국 fda 자문위원회의 승인 지지를 받음에 따라 fda 승인 가능성이 한층 밝아졌다. idaten funisuke

imhentai.xx 아름다워지고 싶다 그것은 모든 여성의 욕망이다. 보지의 가장 안쪽을 자극되면 뭔가 들어 올려요 미카미 사상, 최고로 이키 걷는. 초심으로 아무 색도 물들지 않은 그녀의 포르치오를 첫 개발. 나 보지인데 지금 바로 이태원 흑인한테 달려가면. 콤포스텔라compostela, 순례 인증서를. insidious_ the red door 영화 온라인

jav 카사노바 리스본에서 600km, 포르투에서 240km 전체 포르투갈 길 중에서 좋은 구간만을 골라 걷는 하이라이트 일정입니다. 이곳은 예수님의 제자 중 하나인 성 야고보의 무덤이 있는 곳으로 중세 시대부터 유럽 전역에서 순례자들이 찾던 신성한 길로 유네스코 세계문화유산으로. 그러나 그녀는 강성감 개발에 의해, 어리석은 모습으로 절정을 반복하게 되어 버렸다. 포르티오는 뼈에 기기를 이식하여 약물, 체액, 수액 등을 골수에 직접 전달하는 골내 주입 기기이다. Hodv21309 jav 무료 온라인 시청, ayase momono, 항문 포르티오 클리닉 항문 질내사정에 중독된 변태 여성.

j1ns1m 일라이릴리社의 새로운 골다공증 치료제인 포르티오forteo가 미국 fda 자문위원회의 승인 지지를 받음에 따라 fda 승인 가능성이 한층 밝아졌다. 당시 몹시 간호해 준 원장의 뒤의 얼굴을 알고 버리고, 다시는 돌아올 수 없는 포르티오 개발의 인체 실험을 한다. 나 보지인데 지금 바로 이태원 흑인한테 달려가면. 포르티오는 기존의 골다공증 치료제와는 달리 골다공증 환자의 골밀도를 증가시키는 작용을 하는 새로운 계열의 약물이다. Hodv21309 jav 무료 온라인 시청, ayase momono, 항문 포르티오 클리닉 항문 질내사정에 중독된 변태 여성.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.