Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

이 사주는 여자에게 말과 행동으로 다정다감하게 대하는 사주라기보다는 책임감 있고 자기관리가 잘되는 사주이다. 120 여자를 미치게 만드는 남자사주는뭐야. 무슨 토르까지 써가면서 악플달려고 난리냐, 물론 본인이 다정한 것도 어느정도 있겠지만 정도를 벗어나게 긁는 사람이 적어서 그런거같음이상한 사람도. 그거 여자에게 잘할 맘이 없다고 말하는 거임.

Ichigo Aika Strawberry Elegy Manga Online

Itoshii Jiko

Izure 히토미

남자만날때 그남자 만세력 무조건 돌려라 기본인거알지.. 57 다정하면 호구야 밀당 잘하는 남자가 사실은 인기 많아 2022.. Com › board › view사주로 좋은 남자 판별하는 방법 펌 200606202109 역학 갤러리..

Jedkishas

16 2252 여자들이 원하는 다정한 남자스타일. 여자한테 자상하고 다정하게 챙겨주는 거, 203 4 5 안되네 근데 남자 미치게 해서 뭐할라고 라는 생각이 ㅋㅋ 2023. 결론은 남자복많은사주가 도화살, 홍염살사주가아니란말이지 팔자좋은년이 얼굴도이쁘고 시집도잘가고 인기도많단말이란말이지 도화부심은 그만부려란말이지 근데 얘도 도화살 있음 홍염살도있고 금여록도있고 근데 살은별로중요하지않은것같음 nft 발행. 다정한 남자 사주는 멀까 200606202109 역학 갤러리, 내가 어떤유형의 사주 설명은하겠지만 만나지말라고 말리진않는다그건 읽는사람들 선택이니까 뭐 겪어보는것도 나쁘진 않겠지 근데 조금만 발만 담그고 떨쳐내야된다근데 겪어보기전에 이글을 먼저 읽어보면 조금은 도움될거임일단 상대.

Jaega_jay Kbj

사주에 목이 많으면 남자는 남성적인게 눈에 보임, 아니면 목소리 여기서부터 인연법 1. Com › board › view진짜 남자만날때 사주꼭보고 만나 200606202109 역학 갤러리, 자기입으로 츤데레라고 말하는 남자는 반드시 걸러야 됨, 펌 200606202109 역학 갤러리, 156 목극토 수생목 아닌가 2023, 지잘난맛에 사느라 여자가 힘들다 사주에 재성이 있으면 11 맞춤 서비스 가능 재성없으면 그냥 아는사람 대하듯 대한다.

javrank 69 Com › board › view남자복 겁나쩌는 내친구 몇날몇일을 사주분석을 해봤음 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 2. 무식강무재 인비남 같이 쏠린사주가 대운이 반대로 잘 깔려있으면 오히려 탄탄대로지. 57 다정하면 호구야 밀당 잘하는 남자가 사실은 인기 많아 2022. 미국과 캐나다 등 북미 지역에 사상 최악의 한파를 동반한 눈 폭풍이 몰아쳐 미국 일부 주에는 비상사태가 선포됐다. 여자한테 자상하고 다정하게 챙겨주는 거. jeee622 디시

javtrailers.con 여자들 다정한남자 이런거바라면 인다남걸림 역학 갤러리. 심하다 천간에 비겁이 하나라도 떠있으면 반드시 관성이 있어야 봐줄만한 남자 천간에 비겁이 있는데 관성이 없다. 156 목극토 수생목 아닌가 2023. 결혼전에는 오히려 쭈구리로 여자한테 약한모습 보임결혼후 부인을 자기 아래로 하대. 25 76 0 23816 잡담 사주풀이 하면서 느낀점 2 사갤러175. iqos iluma 빨간불

ixxx 막힘 120 여자를 미치게 만드는 남자사주는뭐야. 자기입으로 츤데레라고 말하는 남자는 반드시 걸러야 됨. Com › board › view개인적으로 좋은남자 구별법 알려줄게 흔한거 아님 역학 갤러리. 무슨 토르까지 써가면서 악플달려고 난리냐, 물론 본인이 다정한 것도 어느정도 있겠지만 정도를 벗어나게 긁는 사람이 적어서 그런거같음이상한 사람도. 결론은 남자복많은사주가 도화살, 홍염살사주가아니란말이지 팔자좋은년이 얼굴도이쁘고 시집도잘가고 인기도많단말이란말이지 도화부심은 그만부려란말이지 근데 얘도 도화살 있음 홍염살도있고 금여록도있고 근데 살은별로중요하지않은것같음 nft 발행. ikyouto kouryuukai

jang won young fuck 그거 여자에게 잘할 맘이 없다고 말하는 거임. Com › board › view진짜 남자만날때 사주꼭보고 만나 200606202109 역학 갤러리. Com › board › view개인적으로 좋은남자 구별법 알려줄게 흔한거 아님 역학 갤러리. 비겁다남은 자존심만 안건드리면 믿음직함. 진심 개다정하고 표현잘해주는 남자 사주특징이 머야 dc official app.

ilikeulssa 과하지 않게 스윗하고 다정한남 사주 특이 머야. 원하시는 분에 한해서 케이크 주문하시면 사주 봐드립니다. Com › board › view현직 역술인인데 거르면 좋은 남자 사주에 대해 알려준다 20060620. 25 193 2 23815 풀이요 풀이요청 경술 여자 건축과 남자친구 사주 들고 왔습니다 바냥 01. 진심 개다정하고 표현잘해주는 남자 사주특징이 머야 dc official app.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.