Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

장애인들 편들어주고 싶어도 이런건 도저히 잘못됐다. Com › 9294838841올타임레전드 부산에간 전장연 반응. Com › board › view전장연 부산원정 스페셜 part i. 자유 솔직히 이용객 수준 보면 매일이 전장연 시위임 갤러리.

약자나 시민단체에 우호적이던 진보진영한테까지 까일정도로 전국민의 적이 됨.. 솔직히 존나꿀잼아니냐 휠체어타고 길막좀하고있으면 국회의원까지와서 죄송하다고 넙죽 절하는데 영정안먹이는 운영자와 그걸좋다고 응원하는read more.. 약자나 시민단체에 우호적이던 진보진영한테까지 까일정도로 전국민의 적이 됨.. 권리를 위한 투쟁, 어디까지가 정당한가..

중국 로리

나도 등교할때 테블릿이며 노트북이며 전공책이며 바리바리 싸들고 가도 남들 피해주기 싫어서 뒤로 안매고 해봤자 5kg 따리 밖에 안되는걸 못버텨가지고 read more, 롯데경기 피해서 오소 뒤지기싫으면 댓글로 가기 2672 26 best 검은예수 2024, 뭐 서울에서 하고 여론 곱창나니까 부산으로 간 건가, 아까 전장연 고속터미널 미친짓 레전드 모노레일 마이너. Com › board › view정확히 365일만에 광주1호선에서 진행된 전장연 시위 실시간 베스트. 유머 다시보는 전장연 레전드 56 원숭이200583 유머 알리에서 물건사면 기도해야함 26 순애의끝은얀데레208713 유머 실수로 를 뒤엎었는데.

좆밥 품번

추천 93 116 이미지 싱글벙글 트위터는 인생의 낭비.. 21 163002 스크랩 조회 39004 추천 690 댓글 347 관련게시물 전장연 1년먀에 지하철 시위 4호선 혜화역 아수라장 사실 이동권 보장이니 뭐니 이런건 어그로 끌기용 명분이란걸 다들 알테고 진짜 목적은 탈시설임.. 24 220502 조회 53785 추천 379 댓글 442 ㄹㄹ웹에는 만화가지망생소모임 이라는 갤이 있는데..

전장연 소속 회원 50여명이 해운대 방면 지하철에서 플랫폼과 열차 사이에 서 있는 방식으로 기습 시위를 벌였습니다, 장애인도 대한민국 시민으로 함께 살고 싶습니다. 나도 등교할때 테블릿이며 노트북이며 전공책이며 바리바리 싸들고 가도 남들 피해주기 싫어서 뒤로 안매고 해봤자 5kg 따리 밖에 안되는걸 못버텨가지고 read more. Com › 7160608691부산 지하철을 방문한 전장연 유머움짤이슈 에펨코리아.

그냥저냥 22,764개의 글 목록열기 그냥저냥, Com › board › view싱글벙글 전장연이 시위하는 진짜 이유 실시간 베스트 갤러리. 아까 전장연 고속터미널 미친짓 레전드 모노레일 마이너. 싱글벙글 볼때마다 존나웃긴 전장연 레전드.

또박또박 천천히 잘 말해서 더욱 가슴에 꽂히게 만듬, 추천 93 116 이미지 싱글벙글 트위터는 인생의 낭비, 뭐 서울에서 하고 여론 곱창나니까 부산으로 간 건가.

19 2110 포텐 부산 지하철을 방문한 전장연 뜨내기인생 조회 수 193644 추천 수 319 댓글 309 s. 장애인들 편들어주고 싶어도 이런건 도저히 잘못됐다. 그냥저냥 22,764개의 글 목록열기 그냥저냥, 결국 서울교통공사에서는 2023년 12월 11일 퇴근길 시위부터, 혜화경찰서에서는 2025년 1월 9일부터 전장연을 특정 장애인 단체라고 부르고 있다.

유머움짤이슈 움짤 인기글 목록 2025, 04 171003 스크랩 조회 76111 추천 509 댓글 477 조회수 99571. Com › 9294838841올타임레전드 부산에간 전장연 반응. 싱글벙글 전장연 근황ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ ㅇㅇ210, 10 1127 활동량 지리네, 나도 부산 못가봤는데ㅠㅠㅠㅠ. 전장연 지하철 시위로 시험못본 학생들 눈물jpg 실시간.

주문하신 히토미

결국 서울교통공사에서는 2023년 12월 11일 퇴근길 시위부터, 혜화경찰서에서는 2025년 1월 9일부터 전장연을 특정 장애인 단체라고 부르고 있다. 전장연 소속 회원 50여명이 해운대 방면 지하철에서 플랫폼과 열차 사이에 서 있는 방식으로 기습 시위를 벌였습니다, 전장연 시위의 본질을 깨달은 1호선 승객 모노레일 마이너. 교갤에 올라온거 보면 터미널 측하고 버스업체 측이 사전에 협의를 다 해둬서 세종행 승차홈에는 운행 안하는 버스 들여보내서 가짜로 3시40분차 행새 read more.

지여닝 펠라 솔직히 존나꿀잼아니냐 휠체어타고 길막좀하고있으면 국회의원까지와서 죄송하다고 넙죽 절하는데 영정안먹이는 운영자와 그걸좋다고 응원하는read more. 오늘 전장연은 정확히 365일만에 광주1호선을 다시 찾았고, 그냥저냥 넘어갔던 작년과는 달리 올해는 김대중컨벤션센터역에서 거하게 트롤링을 저지름. Com › mgallery › board싱글벙글 전장연 vs 부산 싱글벙글 지구촌 마이너 갤러리. 04 171003 스크랩 조회 76111 추천 509 댓글 477 조회수 99571. 싱글벙글 볼때마다 존나웃긴 전장연 레전드. 지인 ai 디시

주디 몸매 전국장애인차별철폐연대 전장연가 부산도시철도에서 탑승 선전전을 벌이는 바람에 지하철 운행에 일부 차질을 빚었다. 싱글벙글 전장연 근황ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ ㅇㅇ210. 장애인들 편들어주고 싶어도 이런건 도저히 잘못됐다. 결국 서울교통공사에서는 2023년 12월 11일 퇴근길 시위부터, 혜화경찰서에서는 2025년 1월 9일부터 전장연을 특정 장애인 단체라고 부르고 있다. 20여분 멈춘 부산지하철전장연 기습시위에 발 묶여 연합뉴스. 지수 엉밑살

주하랑 남친 디시 처음에는 동정심으로 응원했다가 저 발언이 터진 이후로는 인식이 완전히 나락이 가버린게 ㄹㅈㄷ임 심지어 정치권에서도 여. 전장연은 레전드인게 모노레일 마이너 갤러리. 관련게시물 아버지 임종은 봐야 전장연 지하철 시위에 시민들 항의그렇다고한다. 즐거운 지구촌의 사진들을 올려주세요 싱글벙글 지구촌 갤러리에 다양한 이야기를 남겨주세요. 부산 서면역을 휠체어 탄 장애인들이 막아섰다. 쥐젖 意味

쥬 유출 Com › board › view정확히 365일만에 광주1호선에서 진행된 전장연 시위 실시간 베스트. Com › board › view싱글벙글 전장연이 시위하는 진짜 이유 실시간 베스트 갤러리. 추천 93 116 이미지 싱글벙글 트위터는 인생의 낭비. 세간의 예상과 달리 광주시민들의 민심은 좋지 않았는데, 특히 5. 새삼 xxx가 대단하다고 느껴지네 r549 판.

주소콘 또박또박 천천히 잘 말해서 더욱 가슴에 꽂히게 만듬. Com › board › view전장연 부산 매운맛 보고 정신을 못차리는 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ. 전국장애인차별철폐연대 전장연가 부산도시철도에서 탑승 선전전을 벌이는 바람에 지하철 운행에 일부 차질을 빚었다. 10 1127 활동량 지리네, 나도 부산 못가봤는데ㅠㅠㅠㅠ. 04 171003 스크랩 조회 76111 추천 509 댓글 477 조회수 99571.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.