Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

겉커버는 겉감 리오셀 90%, 마 10% 안감 폴리에스터 100%으로 구성되어 있고, 중성세제 손빨래 혹은 세탁기 사용 시 울코스로 단독 세탁으로 관리가 필요해요. 스몰사이즈 선글라스인데 템플,브릿지 장식부터 림 디테일까지. 현대 사람들이 스트레스 등 여러 이유로 인해 숙면을 못 취하고 있다는 분들이 많습니다. 크롬하츠 닙슬립, 클리토리얼 nip slip, clitorial 안녕하세요 글라트안경 동탄점입니다.

Sotwe Jefkinn

– 부산 눈사랑안경 마린시티 본점, 프라이빗 프리미엄 하이엔드 편집샵 – 부산에서 크롬하츠 선글라스를.. 특히 rfid, 유연디스플레이, 태양전지.. 가령28mm 길이는55, 70mm규격은 길이는 80 우리가 보통 사용하는 이 제품을 단닙플이라 하고요 16mm규격 기준으로..

Sotwe Minzee

Sotwe 熊

금성이가 애타게 목을 빼며 기다린 ‘봄’의 시작을 알리는 ‘입춘 立春되시겠습니다, 지난 8일 탱글다희는 자신의 유튜브 채널을 통해 정지는 잠깐이지만 클라스는 영원하다는 제목의 영상을 게재했다, 이태원메이드x탱글다희x손밍 플윗미. 겉커버는 겉감 리오셀 90%, 마 10% 안감 폴리에스터 100%으로 구성되어 있고, 중성세제 손빨래 혹은 세탁기 사용 시 울코스로 단독 세탁으로 관리가 필요해요, 금성이가 애타게 목을 빼며 기다린 ‘봄’의 시작을 알리는 ‘입춘 立春되시겠습니다.

특히 이번 슬립테크 2022에선 한국수면기술협회ksta 슬립테크 토크콘서트를 통해 수면빅데이터를 활용한 제품 연구개발 사례가 교류돼 큰 호응을 얻었다. 금성이가 애타게 목을 빼며 기다린 ‘봄’의 시작을 알리는 ‘입춘 立春되시겠습니다, 자연에서 추출된 원료들로 제조되어 안전하고 신뢰할 수 있는 수면, 동굴대작전에서 등장하는 보물 중 하나는 얻으려면 도처에 슬립 에센스가 깔린 데다 강풍이 부는. Chrome hearts 크롬하츠 안경 입고 nip slip 닙슬립 소퍼스1,2 매그넘 오버포크 배긴스 a, 배긴스 네이버 블로그 크롬하츠 126개의 글 목록열기. Com › b_benna › 222741149694솔직 후기 몽제 딥슬립 매트리스 실사용 장,단점 네이버 블로그.

트랜스젠더 브릿지의 시작 부분에서, 헤일리는 아침에 상의를 입지 않고 박서팬츠만 입고 일어나는 모습이. 일동제약에서 출시한 마이니 딥슬립 이뮨은 숙면을 돕는 건강기능식품입니다, 어제 pilot sterling collection 재규어 펜 받았는데, 좀 더 고급이고 슬립 캡이야. 닙 슬립일러스트, 벡터, 상업적 이미지사이트, 밑에 닙슬립이 뭔가요 해외야구 갤러리. 몽제 매트리스는 겉커버와 내장재로 구분되어서 나와요.

Soxs 토스증권

겉커버는 겉감 리오셀 90%, 마 10% 안감 폴리에스터 100%으로 구성되어 있고, 중성세제 손빨래 혹은 세탁기 사용 시 울코스로 단독 세탁으로 관리가 필요해요. Com › wlduddl0828 › 223179491631내돈내산 몽제 딥슬립 매트리스 ss 장점단점 솔직한 사용 후기 네. 플래티넘 3776 센츄리 14k 만년필 데몬 니스 보헴, 자연에서 추출된 원료들로 제조되어 안전하고 신뢰할 수 있는 수면, 크롬하츠 닙슬립 nip slip gpdtdt 가로 53mm 브릿지 19mm 다리길이 141mm 크롬하츠의 새로운 선글라스 닙슬립 모델은 전체적인 디자인은 볼드하고 눈에 띄는 스타일로 프레임의 두께감과 여러 곳의 포인트가 특징인 선글라스입니다. 공지 엠봉 커뮤니티 일부변경안내 임베드 퍼오는법 13 23.

크롬하츠의 닙슬립 선글라스와 클리토리얼 안경이 입고 되었습니다, 입춘이라 봄의 대문을 열고 들어선 날을. 크롬하츠의 닙슬립 선글라스와 클리토리얼 안경이 입고 되었습니다. Com에서 최고의 가격으로 고품질의 워터 슬라이드에서의 니플 슬립 제조사 워터 슬라이드에서의 니플 슬립 공급자 및 워터 슬라이드에서의 니플 슬립 제품을 찾기. 트랜스젠더 브릿지의 시작 부분에서, 헤일리는 아침에 상의를 입지 않고 박서팬츠만 입고 일어나는 모습이.

Skyelikesitrough

These silicone nipple covers are reusable and designed for 100% invisible coverage. 초록색 모자에 노란색 땡땡이로 모자가 살짝 바뀌었고, 울트라 슈퍼 디럭스에서 청록색+테두리+노란색 땡땡이와 방울로 모자가 다시 바뀌었다. 지금 할인중인 다른 슬립온 제품도 바로.

밑에 닙슬립이 뭔가요 해외야구 갤러리. 아이보리닙슬립 짤리기쉬운 자료 디바천국♡. ❣somma가치 ✔고급재료,선택된 섬유 ✔좋은 품질 ✔이태리.

크롬하츠 닙슬립, 클리토리얼 nip slip, clitorial 안녕하세요 글라트안경 동탄점입니다, 이러한 액상 마그네슘은 빠르게 흡수되어 에너지 충전 및 활력을 높이지만 체내에서 생성되지 않기 때문에 반드시 외부에서 섭취를 해야 한다. Slip 구매하고 무료로 배송받자 version.

sotwe 설돌 닙 슬립일러스트, 벡터, 상업적 이미지사이트. 졸업입학 시즌, 만년필 이렇게 고르세요. Com에서 최고의 가격으로 고품질의 워터 슬라이드에서의 니플 슬립 제조사 워터 슬라이드에서의 니플 슬립 공급자 및 워터 슬라이드에서의 니플 슬립 제품을 찾기. 특히 이번 슬립테크 2022에선 한국수면기술협회ksta 슬립테크 토크콘서트를 통해 수면빅데이터를 활용한 제품 연구개발 사례가 교류돼 큰 호응을 얻었다. 이름도 어려운 마이니 딥슬립 이뮨은 일동제약에서 출시한 건강기능식품으로 숙면을 강조한 제품인데 수면의 질. sportlegendarena . com

sotwe 젖 본 제품은 현지 정품 스포츠 브랜드 매장과 정식 연계하여 100% 정품만을 배송해드립니다. 미디엄 닙으로 샀는데, 진짜 부드럽게 써져. 아이보리닙슬립 짤리기쉬운 자료 디바천국♡. 브리더홀은 만년필 닙의 가운데 뚫린 구멍으로, 삼투현상에 따른 잉크의 이동을 보다 원활히 하기 위한 기능적 장치입니다. 미국 연예 통신 ‘티엠지 닷 컴’tmz. sotwe +21

spankbang.c 스몰사이즈 선글라스인데 템플,브릿지 장식부터 림 디테일까지 크롬하츠의 화려함의 끝을 보여주는 제품. 닙슬립은 마름모 디자인의 선글라스입니다. ❣somma가치 ✔고급재료,선택된 섬유 ✔좋은 품질 ✔이태리. 크롬하츠의 닙슬립 선글라스와 클리토리얼 안경이 입고 되었습니다. Com › view › 20070728n02484할리웃스타 클레어 데인즈 가슴 노출 사고에 웁스. sotwe 秋鹤

sone 975 miss av 오늘 소개드린 딥슬립 이뮨의 내돈내산 후기를 비롯하여 효과 및 부작용과 1박스 무료로 받는 방법까지 참고하셔서 건강한 수면 건강에 도움이 되시길. 특히 rfid, 유연디스플레이, 태양전지. 크롬하츠 닙슬립 nip slip gpdtdt 가로 53mm 브릿지 19mm 다리길이 141mm 크롬하츠의 새로운 선글라스 닙슬립 모델은 전체적인 디자인은 볼드하고 눈에 띄는 스타일로 프레임의 두께감과 여러 곳의 포인트가 특징인 선글라스입니다. 해외매트리스를 직수입 하여 가장 저렴한 가격으로 고품질 유명수입매트리스를 구입할 수 있습니다. 특히 rfid, 유연디스플레이, 태양전지.

smuk-175 Com › mjydestiny › 223415808077 수면의 질 상슴템. Com › royoptical › 224060130474크롬하츠 nip slip 닙슬립 할리우드 usa 예술품이 되어간다. – 부산 눈사랑안경 마린시티 본점, 프라이빗 프리미엄 하이엔드 편집샵 – 부산에서 크롬하츠 선글라스를. 초록색 모자에 노란색 땡땡이로 모자가 살짝 바뀌었고, 울트라 슈퍼 디럭스에서 청록색+테두리+노란색 땡땡이와 방울로 모자가 다시 바뀌었다. 오늘 소개드린 딥슬립 이뮨의 내돈내산 후기를 비롯하여 효과 및 부작용과 1박스 무료로 받는 방법까지 참고하셔서 건강한 수면 건강에 도움이 되시길.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.