Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

美原すみれ みはらすみれが出演するアダルト動画・エロ動画が107作品！美原すみれ出演のアダルトビデオを随時更新！全作品無料サンプル動画付き！アダルト動画・エロ動画ソクミルでは、高画質で低価格のアダルト動画・エロ動画をストリーミング／ダウンロードで配信中！. 發行日期 最近更新 收藏數 今日瀏覽數 本週. Com › category › 美原すみれmissav｜50代・五十路 美原すみれ. Sprd1459 母の愛情 美原すみれ missav.

츄 누드

체인소맨 파워 망치

2023年 僕は子供部屋おじさんです。 母で性欲処理をすませています。 hカップの胸は僕だけのもの 桃色かぞくvol, Aldn238 この雌漢淫獣なり 美原すみれ 免费高清av在线看. 美原すみれ の検索結果 最高の日本avサイト、永遠に無料、高速、ラグなし、10万本以上の動画、毎日更新、再生中に広告. Aldn238 この雌漢淫獣なり 美原すみれ 免费高清av在线看.

최면성지도 Hentai

29 美原すみれ 701 635 1609 14705.. 發行日期 最近更新 收藏數 今日瀏覽數 本週.. Sprd1459 母の愛情 美原すみれ missav 免费高清av在线看.. 「美原すみれ」関連作品 missav｜浴衣 フル動画至極！！ 麗しの熟女湯屋 ヌルべちょ濃厚ねっとり中出しソープ 20人 4時間 グローバルメディアエンタテインメント 2025..

29 美原すみれ（2月23日、sodクリエイト） 息子の友達のマセガキ共に性処理させられザーメンまみれの母親～美原すみれ（3月23日、sodクリエイト）. All single actress multiple actresses english subtitle, 2023年 僕は子供部屋おじさんです。 母で性欲処理をすませています。 hカップの胸は僕だけのもの 桃色かぞくvol, Watch 美原すみれs av online missav.

美原すみれ ムラっch 以前、「missavが見れない」といったエラーが発生したこともありましたが、原因を確認する間もなく、すぐに復旧していました。また、yahoo. 美原すみれ出演的av 在線看 missav. 「美原すみれ」の記事一覧です。 品番h_1165goju00160｜手に余るほどの巨乳を丹念に愛撫しながら、パンティ越しに勃起チ ポをグイグイ押しつけると、我慢できなくなったのか「もう挿れて」とぐちょぐちょになったマ コに挿入を懇願してくる欲求不満の美熟女オッパブ嬢に生ハメ中出し！. 発売日 20250809収録 178分シリーズ 親戚の絶倫wおばさん ジャンル ハイビジョン 独占配信 レズビアン 乱交 熟女 叔母さん 痴女 女優 よしい美希（伊沢涼子、吉井美希） 美原すみれ メーカー 椿鳳院. Com › category › 美原すみれmissav｜50代・五十路 美原すみれ. 發行日期 最近更新 收藏數 今日瀏覽數 本週.

천사의 악마 야스 ジャンル 英語字幕, 熟女, 人妻・主婦, 巨乳, 単体作品, ハイビジョン. Com › tag › 美原すみれ「美原すみれ」関連作品 missav｜浴衣. 10｜umso00628｜織田真子 豊永映美 佐久間泉 青木玲 滝川恵理（有沢実紗） 近藤郁（近藤郁美） 和田百美花 川上ゆう（森野雫） 岡江凛 田原凛花 佐々木咲和 加山なつこ 風間ゆみ 八神さおり 澤村レイコ（高坂保奈美、高坂ますみ. 子宝には恵まれなかったが、夫婦二人の生活に幸せ感じていた。 しかし数年前から会社での昇進争いにストレスを溜めていた夫が次第にすみれを束縛するようになっていた。. 配信日：20190314 品番：sprd1117 女優： 美原堇, 美原すみれ タグ： 中国語字幕, 養母, 熟女, 人妻, 近親相姦, 単体作品, 中出し, 高画質, 義母, 人妻・主婦, 近親相姦, 単体作品, 中出し, ハイビジョン. 천만페소

체인쏘맨 갤 Mihara sumire出演のav映画をオンラインで見る. Watch 美原すみれs av online missav. Sort by release date. Live › dm42 › japfas020 好きもの夫婦の48手 朝昼晩 美原すみれ missav オン. Mihara sumire出演のav映画をオンラインで見る. 체인소맨 225화

축구선수 허벅지 디시 美原すみれ の検索結果 最高の日本avサイト、永遠に無料、高速、ラグなし、10万本以上の動画、毎日更新、再生中に広告. Vnds3404 女上司の成熟ボディを堪能した地方出張2日間. 美原すみれ輪姦モザイク破壊 嘅搜尋結果 最好嘅日本av網站，永久免費，高速，無卡頓，超過100,000個影片，每日更新，播放. 共働きで収入も安定し優しい夫との生活にすみれは幸せを感じていた。 ある一点を除いては すみれの不満それは、夫がセックスの時、必ずコンドームをつける事だった。 「. Com › category › 美原すみれ「美原すみれ」関連のntr作品 missav｜ntr. 최애의 아이 칼빵

최솜이 성형 디시 Live › dm42 › japfas020 好きもの夫婦の48手 朝昼晩 美原すみれ missav オン. Watch 美原すみれs av online. 10｜umso00628｜織田真子 豊永映美 佐久間泉 青木玲 滝川恵理（有沢実紗） 近藤郁（近藤郁美） 和田百美花 川上ゆう（森野雫） 岡江凛 田原凛花 佐々木咲和 加山なつこ 風間ゆみ 八神さおり 澤村レイコ（高坂保奈美、高坂ますみ. 29 美原すみれ 701 635 1609 14705. すべて 单体作品 美原すみれ 14251 aldn015 あなた、私みたいなおばさん興奮させて.

체벌 스팽 Com › tag › 美原すみれ「美原すみれ」関連作品 missav｜浴衣. Sprd1459 母の愛情 美原すみれ missav 免费高清av在线看. 美原すみれ av 온라인 보기 missav. 11 グローバルメディアエンタテインメント. Watch 美原すみれs av online missav.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.