Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

위사진은 대욕탕사진이고 풀앤스파 노천도 있는데 비쌈 대욕탕만 가는것을 추천 주차장 엄청넓음 경기도 이천시에 있음. 그 속에 몸을 맡기고 있으면 해외 최상급 호텔의 인피니티 풀이 부럽지 않다. 이천 테르메덴 온천 수영장 주차장, 준비물, 가격, 야간 후기. 이제 주문번호를 보고, 음식이 나오길 기다리면 됩니다.

출처 이천 테르메덴 공식 홈페이지 이용을 마치고 나오면, 세면 및 사우나를 이용할 수 있어요.. 이로ㅋㅋㅋ 가는 길부터 테르메덴 풀앤스파&찜질방 정보..

Ditesunaหลุด

이천 테르메덴 숲 속의 노천온천 테르메덴 다녀온 후기입니다.. 일부러 이렇게 맞출래도 힘든, 날씨까지 너무나 완벽했던 이천 테르메덴 다녀온 후기였습니다.. 노는 내내 부모님 모셔와도 너무 좋았겠다는 생각을 했어요.. 출처 이천 테르메덴 공식 홈페이지 이용을 마치고 나오면, 세면 및 사우나를 이용할 수 있어요..

Dom023s Sotwe

Ehenta Ntr

구분, 풀앤스파, 찜질스파, 온천사우나, 매표소. 시몬스테라스 후기 이천 시몬스테라스 크리스마스 트리 평일 애견동반ok 안녕하세요 여행블로거 리나링입니다 오늘은 서울근교 경기도 이천 크리스마스 핫플인 시몬스테라스 평 blog, Com › juviana › 223670321853이천 가을에 방문한 테르메덴 평일 방문, 찜질방 및 이용 꿀팁. 1층으로 내려가면 남자여자 락커룸이 나옵니다, 테르메덴의 가장 큰 장점은 진짜 온천수에 있다.

26 국내여행테르메덴 이천 테르메덴 풀&스파 이용하기 전에 준비할 사항 1 ft. 1월에 테르메덴 라이브가 또 뜨는 것, 노천탕 마이너 갤러리 율암온천vs테르메덴 질문좀, Com › cjy77777 › 222983863071경기 이천 1박2일 겨울에 이천 테르메덴 다녀온 후기 feat.

en kemono 50%할인 방법 테르메덴 풀&스파 이용하기 전에 준비할 사항 1 ft. 이천 테르메덴 카라반 숙박 & 워터파크 솔직 후기 the kop 이천테르메덴 테르메덴카라반 테르메덴워터파크 이천가볼만한곳 국내카라반여행 가족여행추천 워터파크추천 여름물놀이 카라반여행 카라반숙소 도고파라다이스 워터파크비교. Com › mong_gi › 223918446003테르메덴 주말 후기 영업시간, 요금, 준비물, 붐비지 않는 시간대. 그 동안 너무 바빠서 두달동안 포스팅을 못하다가 이제서야 예전부터 뜨끈뜨끈한 야외 온천에서 얼굴은 칼바람을 맞으며 몸을 지지며 아무생각 없이 스트레스를 푸는 상상을. 50%할인 방법 테르메덴 풀&스파 이용하기 전에 준비할 사항 1 ft. ehentai makurou

emilytexas 三人組 수도권에서 1시간 거리에 있으며, 차가 좀 막힌다면 한 시간 반까지 걸릴 것 같습니다. 이천 테르메덴의 풀앤스파와 리솜포레스트. 테르메덴 내부 결재는 팔찌로 계산을 다합니다. 50%할인 방법 테르메덴 풀&스파 이용하기 전에 준비할 사항 1 ft. 테르메덴의 하이라이트는 역시나 인피니티풀💙 카라반 요금 및 자세한 정보는 블로그 글 참고🤍 이천테르메덴 테르메텐 이천가볼한곳 서울근교여행 테르메덴카라반 테르메덴워터파크 테르메덴온천 m. durheld.xmdnlxj

englam e621 테르메덴 모든 온천탕도 와 엄청 뜨겁네라고 생각이 들지는 않습니다. Com › mong_gi › 223918446003테르메덴 주말 후기 영업시간, 요금, 준비물, 붐비지 않는 시간대. 50%할인 방법 테르메덴 풀&스파 이용하기 전에 준비할 사항 1 ft. 어김없이 찾아온 주말, 생각해보니 사계절 내내 주말엔 뭐할까 고민하는거같아요. 이웃 블로거 전체보기 799개의 글 목록닫기. doji ro

eromo kpop 시몬스테라스 후기 이천 시몬스테라스 크리스마스 트리 평일 애견동반ok 안녕하세요 여행블로거 리나링입니다 오늘은 서울근교 경기도 이천 크리스마스 핫플인 시몬스테라스 평 blog. 겨울방학 시즌을 맞아 아이들과 이천에 다녀왔어요😁 이천 테르메덴에서 숙박하기로 해서 체크인 시간 전 m. 그래도 뻥 뚫려있어 실내 인피니티 리버보다는 답답한 느낌은 없습니다. 저는 겨울 온천을 굉장히 사랑하는데요. 그러므로 테르메덴 이용계획이 있다면 쇼핑라이브 구매 추천.

erome 유후 이전에 다녀온 리솜 포레스트의 스파도 만족스러웠기에 찬바람 불때 스파여행은 이제 당연한 겨울여행 코스가 되어버렸다. 노천탕 마이너 갤러리 율암온천vs테르메덴 질문좀. Com › imddosun › 223301029759이천 테르메덴 온천 후기 복장, 준비물, 시설 네이버 블로그. 국립중앙박물관 다녀온 후기 사유의 방 위주. 어김없이 찾아온 주말, 생각해보니 사계절 내내 주말엔 뭐할까 고민하는거같아요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.