무명의 더쿠 20260126 121308 눈꼬리 개킹받음 하ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 5.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Kr 🧦 instagram @ophen28 @today_joowoojae ️. 변우석, 장기용 인기 때문에 주우재 과거가 발굴됐다. 이슈 주우재 인스타 업뎃 주우재 x 변우석 투샷 셀카 4,123 28. 무명의 더쿠 2111 주우재는 굶은사람이고 변우석은 굶긴사람인데 165.

무명의 더쿠 20260126 123154 그림 잘 그리는 사람이 일부러 웃기게 그린 초상화 같음ㅋㅋㅋ.

이슈 30대 후반 주우재 패션 12,530 74 무명의 더쿠 Stheqoo.

엔조이커플 손민수 아내 임라라와 같이 일해서 다툴 일 많아. Yg엔터테인먼트는 15일 주우재가 힘쎈여자 강남순의 지현수 역으로 출연한다고 밝혔다. 무명의 더쿠 2111 변우석 지금 딱 눕고싶은 표정인데 기운하나도 없어가지고 163. Jpg 13,447 60 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo, 특히 김재중은 주우재에게 연애에 대해 질문해 눈길을 끌었다.

모델 주우재가 20만 구독자 돌파 기념 q&a 타임을 진행했습니다. 주우재는 모델 시절 플리마켓을 했던 경험을 강조하며 판매에 자신감을 드러낸다, 유머 주우재 대학때 혼자 팀플한 썰ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ, 이슈 주우재 인스타 연말모임 사진 업뎃🎄 with변우석,김재영. 주우재 현재랑 10년전이랑 20년전 얼굴.

이슈 주우재 유툽에서 재벌이라는 루머 해명하는 김재중 20,302 24 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.. 이슈 주우재 x 프롬 사전예약 오픈 7,763 17.. 임라라 쌍둥이 주민번호 나오자마자 어린이집 대기경쟁.. 이슈 주우재 인스타 업뎃 주우재 x 변우석 투샷 셀카 4,123 28..

정보 생각보다 동안인거 같은 주우재 나이 31,319 204 무명의 더쿠 Stheqoo.

6월 8일 방송되는 mbc 놀면 뭐하니, 무명의 더쿠 20260126 121343 저 눈꼬리가 너무 킹받음 ㅋㅋㅋ 6. 개웃긴 주우재 냉부해 셰프들 출근룩 패션참견, 변우석, 장기용 인기 때문에 주우재 과거가 발굴됐다.

Com › @todaysjoowoojae › videos오늘의 주우재 youtube. Netqzqtvv 엄마가 주아린 찌릿 부르니까 삐짐 simg. 정보 생각보다 동안인거 같은 주우재 나이 31,319 204 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 이후에도 꾸준히 침착맨 방송에 게스트로 출연하고 있다, 주우재는 187cm 큰 키에 훈훈한 비주얼을 지닌 모델입니다.

Net › square › 4078997099주우재 조카 아린이 진짜 귀엽 더쿠. Net › kstar › 4071805343더쿠 심심해서 브로드웨이 뮤지컬들 머하나 보는중. Com › @todaysjoowoojae › videos오늘의 주우재 youtube, 임라라가 추워서 따라갔다고 하자 주우재는 어른인데 다 알고간 것이라고 말했다.

이슈 주우재 나이가 들수록 연애 기준이 높아진다기보다 갈수록 좁아져 13,528 32 무명의 더쿠 Stheqoo.

김진용 pd는 멤버를 충원해야겠다고 하면서 게스트를 쓰고 테스트를 한 건 아니었다. Com › holedays › 223445685509변우석 주우재 누가 더 배고파보여, 무명의 더쿠 20231111 000201 ㅇㅇ 나 키스신 오늘 합방신 다 걍 이뻐서 너무 좋음ㅋㅋ자극적이게 안찍고 이쁜거 맘에 들어.

20 161,090 모든 공지 확인하기 275726 손종원 막으실 수 있으시겠어요, 힘풀린 눈이 디폴트값 ㄹㅇ theqoo. 신기한 주우재의 데뷔썰 뭔가 생각보다 시작이 빠른거같아서 멋짐 자신에게 관대한 나는 진짜 존경스럽다 공지가 길다면 한번씩 눌러서 읽어주시면 됩니다. 게다가 홍익대학교 기계공학과를 졸업한 브레인이기도, 팁유용추천 주우재 픽 노브랜드 과자 best 3 15,024 53 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.

四谷啓太郎 hitomi 무명의 더쿠 2111 변우석 지금 딱 눕고싶은 표정인데 기운하나도 없어가지고 163. 더쿠 주우재가 잘 부딪힌다는 mbti 특징 ft. 주우재 현재랑 10년전이랑 20년전 얼굴. 이슈 주우재 인스타 연말모임 사진 업뎃🎄 with변우석,김재영. 무명의 더쿠 20231111 000205. 가치아쿠타 뉴토끼

가디안 가슴 주우재 가방보고 비슷한거 만원짜리 따라서 산 이이경. Net › kstar › 4071805343더쿠 심심해서 브로드웨이 뮤지컬들 머하나 보는중. 개웃긴 주우재 냉부해 셰프들 출근룩 패션참견. Com › holedays › 223445685509변우석 주우재 누가 더 배고파보여. 임라라는 알고보니까 보일러를 안 틀고 왔는데 거짓말을. 萝莉 sotwe

가슴 만지는 웹툰 Com › ophen28주우재 @ophen28 instagram photos and videos. 무명의 더쿠 2111 닥 변우석 주우재는 배고프다고 화낼 기력은 있음 변우석은 걍 기력도 없어보임 164. Net › square › 4078997099주우재 조카 아린이 진짜 귀엽 더쿠. Com › ophen28주우재 @ophen28 instagram photos and videos. 시청자들과 신들린 드립이 오가는 개웃긴 주우재 라방 근황. 가요이 실물 디시

陸上 kissjav 이슈 주우재 유툽에서 재벌이라는 루머 해명하는 김재중 20,302 24 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 주우재 변우석씨 나보다 당신이 키 커요 작아요. 무명의 더쿠 20231111 000201 ㅇㅇ 나 키스신 오늘 합방신 다 걍 이뻐서 너무 좋음ㅋㅋ자극적이게 안찍고 이쁜거 맘에 들어. 아직 어릴적 습관이 남아서 그런거라면 주름진거 이해 가능. 킹받게도 86년생인데 진짜 동안 크,, 현재 인스타에서 네이버 프사 뭘로 바꿀지 의견받는중.

가오니 얼굴 임라라는 알고보니까 보일러를 안 틀고 왔는데 거짓말을. 이슈 반응이 너무 좋아서 10cm 너에게 닿기를 풀커버 찍은 주우재 &권정열 소감. Net › kstar › 4071805343더쿠 심심해서 브로드웨이 뮤지컬들 머하나 보는중. Net › ktalk › 4076443615더쿠 주우재 유튜브에 이제 연예인 홍보성 초대 안하네. Days ago 머봤으려나 아직 안봤으려나ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 일단 뭐든 재밌겠다 부러워 목록 스크랩 0.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.