Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

거의 에나멜 가죽보다 덜 반짝거리는 버전이라고 보면 read more. 06 2316 닥마는 무조건 원더 발삼 발라야됨. 구두약같이 코팅하는 애들을 발라야 맞는거같은데 남자패션 2025. 뚜껑, 가죽영양제가 담긴 통, 그리고 스펀지가 담긴 통.

고세구 방귀

ㅠㅠ 그 노력의 약 1000분의 1정도 노력만 들여서 골고루 문질러 주기만 하면 끝.. 일반 닥마는 무조건 원더발삼 발라야됨..

고릴라 Vs 침팬지 디시

인터넷쇼핑몰 검색하다가 그냥 매장가서 10,000원에 구입완료. 본문 기타 기능 가죽신발 영양제 원더발삼. 닥터마틴 신발에 묻은 먼지를 걸레로 툭툭 털고 닦아준다 2. 원더발삼은 코코넛 오일, 라놀린, 비즈왁스를 닥터마친의 고유의 레시피로 블렌딩 한 가죽케어 전용 크림입니다. 39 아하 원더발삼 주기적으로 발라줬는데 갈라져서 불량인가 했는데 정상인가보네요 맘에 드는 신발이라 막 신다가 새로 사던가 해야겠습니다 2024, 이름 원더발삼 가격 10000원 성능 원더 놀랍다.

검찰 해체 디시

원더 발삼은 광택제가 아니고, 공장에서 광택 처리를 하지 않아요. 하디말라는건 다 하구댕겼네 여러분비올때 신지말래요, 닥터마틴 원더 발삼 85ml 76080447 닥터마틴.

개조아 보지

가죽에 코팅된 게 플라스틱 재질이라서 아무것도 안 흡수할 거예요, 여러가지 신발 영양제가 있지만 원더발삼으로 구입했다. 그리고 한번도 안 입다가 관리해야한다는 생각이 들어서 관리할려고 하는데 집에 가죽 관리용품이 닥터마틴 원더발삼밖에 없어서 혹시 이걸로 가능한지 여쭤볼려고 합니다. 이웃추가 안녕하세요 최근들어 제가 닥터마틴 제품을 2개나 선물받았는데요, 처음 구매한 천연가죽 제품들이라 막 신고 방치했더니 애들이 점점 광택을 잃어가더라구요ㅠㅠ 안되겠다 싶어 인터넷 검색 끝에 원더발삼 을 구매했어요. 그냥 아무 구두약이나 살까 하다가 이왕 구입하는거.

하여튼 심폐소생술이려도 해보려고 급하게 원더발삼이라는걸 사봤다 이름이 왜저러나 했는데 그냥 닥터마틴 신발 관리하는 왁스인 것 같당.. 1달전에 빈티지샵에서 소가죽자켓을 구매했습니다.. 이왕 하는 거 사피르라도 사서 발라주자..

게이 짤

원더 발삼을 바르기 전 나는 아래의 작업을 했다, 발렌타인데이 기획전 for him priceproduct 179,000 pricediscount 170,000 5% 할인 pricecustomer 179,000 model 9064black 제조사 haruta 하루타 원산지 일본 trend 트렌드 없음 남성 pu더비 슈즈 6776black priceproduct 129,000 pricediscount 116,100 10% 할인 pricecustomer 129,000 model 6776black 제조사 haruta 하루타 원산지 일본. 뚜껑을 열면 영양제를 바를 스펀지가 나와요. 그리고 한번도 안 입다가 관리해야한다는 생각이 들어서 관리할려고 하는데 집에 가죽 관리용품이 닥터마틴 원더발삼밖에 없어서 혹시 이걸로 가능한지 여쭤볼려고 합니다. 닥터마틴전용 원더발삼 을 구입하게 되었습니다. 원더발삼은 코코넛 오일, 라놀린, 비즈왁스를 닥터마친의 고유의 레시피로 블렌딩 한 가죽케어 전용 크림입니다.

하여튼 심폐소생술이려도 해보려고 급하게 원더발삼이라는걸 사봤다 이름이 왜저러나 했는데 그냥 닥터마틴 신발 관리하는 왁스인 것 같당, 원더 발삼은 가죽을 관리하고 보호하며, 가죽을 부드럽게 만들어 길들이는 데 도움. 원더발삼의 뚜껑을 열어 보면 이렇게 세 가지 부분으로 나눌 수 있다, 일반 닥마는 무조건 원더발삼 발라야됨. 리뷰 48개의 글 목록열기 activity, 이웃추가 안녕하세요 최근들어 제가 닥터마틴 제품을 2개나 선물받았는데요, 처음 구매한 천연가죽 제품들이라 막 신고 방치했더니 애들이 점점 광택을 잃어가더라구요ㅠㅠ 안되겠다 싶어 인터넷 검색 끝에 원더발삼 을 구매했어요.

갓하엘 꼭지 천연 및 합성 왁스를 혼합하여 가죽에 영양을 공급하고, 컨디셔닝하고, 보호합니다. Martens wonder balsam ⓒ 유지쀼 닥터마틴 중에서도 가장 편안한 신. 그냥 사피르같은 기존 구두제품은 안됨. 우와 발삼 더 진해졌다 제습함에서 꺼내고 공셔터 날리니까 발삼 진해져서 이제는 파인더가 뿌얘짐 필름카메라 2025. 주름이 진 부분과 베라 부분, 안 쪽 가죽에 특별한 신경을 써서 도포해주세요. 게이 바 디시

고세구 디시 우와 발삼 더 진해졌다 제습함에서 꺼내고 공셔터 날리니까 발삼 진해져서 이제는 파인더가 뿌얘짐 필름카메라 2025. 원더 발삼으로 가지고 있는 부츠를 깨끗이 관리하기 위해서는 많은 도구가 필요하지 않습니다. 닥터마틴 원더발삼 50ml 85ml 닥터마틴의 올인원 가죽케어 용품 원더발삼입니다. 원더발삼은 코코넛 오일, 라놀린, 비즈왁스를 닥터마친의 고유의 레시피로 블렌딩 한 가죽케어 전용 크림입니다. ㅎㅎ 귀찮지만 꾸준히 관리하면서 오래 신어야겠네요 닥터마틴 신발을 가진 분이라면 원더발삼은 필수. 걍하리 미드 디시

건대 사라하우스 후기 Step 3 과감하게 원더 발삼 사용하기 원더 발삼 통에서 꺼낸 스펀지를 사용해 왁스를 필요한 양만큼 퍼내어주세요. 필요한 도구 준비 부드러운 천 두장과 약간의 물 step 2. 원더 발삼을 바르기 전 나는 아래의 작업을 했다. 08 1023 스무스로 입문하는 애들은. 리뷰 48개의 글 목록열기 activity. 고등어 은꼴

강모 av 우와 발삼 더 진해졌다 제습함에서 꺼내고 공셔터 날리니까 발삼 진해져서 이제는 파인더가 뿌얘짐 필름카메라 2025. 06 2316 닥마는 무조건 원더 발삼 발라야됨. 원더 발삼은 가죽을 관리하고 보호하며, 가죽을 부드럽게 만들어 길들이는 데 도움. 08 1023 스무스로 입문하는 애들은. 39 아하 원더발삼 주기적으로 발라줬는데 갈라져서 불량인가 했는데 정상인가보네요 맘에 드는 신발이라 막 신다가 새로 사던가 해야겠습니다 2024.

경제왕김피비 디시 Step 3 과감하게 원더 발삼 사용하기 원더 발삼 통에서 꺼낸 스펀지를 사용해 왁스를 필요한 양만큼 퍼내어주세요. 하디말라는건 다 하구댕겼네 여러분비올때 신지말래요. 가죽에 코팅된 게 플라스틱 재질이라서 아무것도 안 흡수할 거예요. 여러가지 신발 영양제가 있지만 원더발삼으로 구입했다. 원더발삼 닥마말고 다른 구두에 써도 댐.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.