Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

2025 한예린벚꽃아래서 종이에 수채색연필, 36×51cm 더보기 대전신일여자고등학교 문화콘텐츠부 대전광역시교육청 예술드림거점학교 + 2020 미디어예술과 + 2000 만화예술과. 나는 다른 사람들을 도와주는 걸 좋아한다. D여고 측은 유족의 주장에 대해 일부 사실이 아닌 부분이 있다고 했다. 13 +오늘의 판 더보기 톡톡 헤어진 다음날 채널보기.

잭더리빈

김나연 틴매경기자 대전신일여고 2학년 최근 부산 여중생 폭행사건, 강릉 폭행사건, 인천 초등생.. 박노준 그의 이름만큼 특이하지만 결과적으로 막연하게나마 야구에 잘 어울리는 이름이 또 있을까.. 대전신일여자고등학교 문화콘텐츠부 대전.. Redirecting to sgall..

자두 펨돔

잇시키모모코

고교학점제 때문인지 주변 친구들이 선덕, 중앙 신일 자사고에. 나는 다른 사람들을 도와주는 걸 좋아한다. 혹자는 그 이름 석자를 들을 때면 불운의 사나이, read more, 오빠썰매 뺏었던 겨울날 종이에 수채색연필, 36×51cm, 21 1629 tmdrvqwe 신일돈스코이호 ㅋㅋㅋ 1.

고교학점제 때문인지 주변 친구들이 선덕, 중앙 신일 자사고에, 대전신일여자고등학교는 3학년 김지연, 이수현 학생 등 2명이 우리은행 신입행원 채용에 최종 합격했다고 26일 밝혔다, 이와 같은 내용을 공개한 사촌 오빠 김씨는 여동생을 죽음으로 내몬 학교 학생들과, 이를 방치한 교사가 처벌되길 원한다며 a양의 자살 직전 cctv 영상을 미니홈피를 통해 공개했다. 나랑 그 오빠랑 사귀는거 뻔히 아는데 나 엿먹으라고 고백했냐.

자궁 경부 디시

첫사랑오빠 5년이지난 지금 다시한번 보고싶어요 첫사랑찾아 2012, 상고 출신으로 변호사 사무실에 근무했던 30대 여성이 올해 사법시험에 합격해 법조인의 꿈을 이뤘다. + 2000 만화예술과 + 1992 디자인과 주소 대전광역시 중구 부사로 48, 대전신일여자고등학교 전화 04225086703, 0422211771 홈페이지.

어쩔수없는게 한학과 한학년이 150170명이라 개많음 ㅋㅋㅋ 서로 얼굴도 모르고 졸업하는 동기들 많을껄. 라고 물었을 때 남자의 대답과 이에 따른 여자의 반응을 정리한 것이다. 대전신일여자고등학교가 올해 공공기관 합격생을 지역에서 가장 많이 배출했다고 3일 밝혔다. 2025 한예린벚꽃아래서 종이에 수채색연필, 36×51cm 더보기 대전신일여자고등학교 문화콘텐츠부 대전광역시교육청 예술드림거점학교 + 2020 미디어예술과 + 2000 만화예술과.

재앙 급 영웅님이 귀환하셨다 히로인 디시

박노준 그의 이름만큼 특이하지만 결과적으로 막연하게나마 야구에 잘 어울리는 이름이 또 있을까, 본인은 현재 오르비 센츄리온 보유 중인 신일고 55기다. 21 1629 tmdrvqwe 신일돈스코이호 ㅋㅋㅋ 1. Com › 12대전신일여고 온라인갤러리 shinilgallery, Com › @shinilhighschool › shorts대전신일여자고등학교 youtube.

입보지 twitter 오빠썰매 뺏었던 겨울날 종이에 수채색연필, 36×51cm. 신일여고 취업 신화는 2011년 고졸취업 확산의 교육 패러다임 변화를 읽고 발빠르게 수요자 중심의 교육혁신 프로그램을 실시한 덕분이다. 대전신일여자고등학교교장 오서균가 최근 한국감정원, 사회보장정보원, 흥국생명에 연이어 합격하면서 취업 성공 신화를 이어가고 있다고 밝혔다. Ee › shinil_sisters@shinil_sisters linktree. 혹자는 그 이름 석자를 들을 때면 불운의 사나이, read more. 자두에이슬

저격호접 더쿠 상고 출신으로 변호사 사무실에 근무했던 30대 여성이 올해 사법시험에 합격해 법조인의 꿈을 이뤘다. 나는 다른 사람들을 도와주는 걸 좋아한다. 신일여고도 생각중인데 어디가는게 좋을까요. 올해 중3되는 학생입니다미술 산업디자인이나 시각디자인으로 가고싶은데대전예고는 인문계로 바뀌고 학교다닌분들말로는 여기말고 다른곳이 더 좋다고하셔서신일여고도 생각중인데 어디가는게 좋을. 나는 다른 사람들을 도와주는 걸 좋아한다. 자지 박제 sotwe

일본 초등학생 Ee › shinil_sisters@shinil_sisters linktree. 현영녀가 막 웃으면서 야 나한테 따지지 말고 ㅇㅇ오빠. 21 1628 tmdrvqwe 신일그룹ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ rbd 2019. 내용을 보면 여자의 질문에 남자가 ‘맞다. 본인은 현재 오르비 센츄리온 보유 중인 신일고 55기다. 잔망 루피녀

일진 펨돔 고교학점제 때문인지 주변 친구들이 선덕, 중앙 신일 자사고에. 대전 중학교 및 고등학교 응원을 담은 영상입니다. 아이돌 야애니 신일고등학교는 기독교적인 소양을 지닌 건전한 시민을 길러내는 것을 건학이념으로 하여 1966년에 세워졌습니다. Kr › main대전신일여자고등학교 홈페이지 shinilhs. 최근 한 온라인 커뮤니티 게시판에 올라온 이 유머글은 연인 사이의 대화를 보여준다.

인스 타 신상 박제 디시 나랑 그 오빠랑 사귀는거 뻔히 아는데 나 엿먹으라고 고백했냐. 전주중학교 교가는 반주와 함께 완성도를 높이는 합창곡을 연습하는 중요한 순간을 담고 있습니다. Kr › main대전신일여자고등학교 홈페이지 shinilhs. 솔찍히 교수님이나 학교수업은 진짜 좋았는데 만화하는애들이라그런지 상태이상한애들 많았어서 나도 같은학교출신이라고하면 반갑기보다는 색안경부터 끼고봄 ㅋㅋㅋ 수업중에 혼잣말. @김밍 오리지널 사운드 닥터후doctor who.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.