Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Fc2 한국 에로메이킹 отборное порно на xgroovy. Xgroovy에서 무료 fc2 한국 에로메이킹 포르노 비디오 시청. English subtitles 우상 해외 포르노 해외 도촬 뱃사공 스캔들 한국어 검색 홈 무수정 포르노 kbj 에로영화_실제 섹스사까시보지 올노출 메이킹 2v. 섹시한 란제리 에로아 브라렛 세트 메이킹필름 wiarae.

12baegirl Porn

Videosection 할머니레즈비언, 레즈비언 오르가즘, 레즈비언 페티쉬, 할머니.. 1일 유튜브 찬우박은 유튜브 검열이 사실.. 1일 유튜브 찬우박은 유튜브 검열이 사실이었습니다.. Default site description..

Открой целый мир эротики, в котором главная тема это fc2 한국 에로메이킹. Com › videorafoxuuycit › gingeubibsu긴급입수 에로영화 무삭제 no. 에로영화 노공사 올노출 메이킹 2탄 영상을 무료로 시청하세요. Com › hangugyadongelomeikingmusagje한국야동 에로 메이킹 무삭제 javrank, 아이엠돌 레알터치수아 메이킹영상 av에로배우수아 출연. 신간 미리보기 스물아홉, 에로영화 찍으러 갈래.

07.avsee.ru

Ero, doggy, korea porn spankbang, 중국 고전 포르노 영화, 아시아 러브 메이킹 비디오. Kobis에서는 영화정보를 체계적으로 관리하고 전국 영화상영관의 발권정보를 집계하기 위해 영화정보통합관리 영화표준식별코드fims를 생성 및 배포부여하고 read more. 섹시한 란제리 에로아 브라렛 세트 메이킹필름 wiarae makingflime│위아래 속옷쇼핑몰│, 2000년대 초중반 에로배우들 요즘 뭐할려나 김규선 마이너.

에로 ng파일 2라는 제목의 메이킹필름도있습니다.. 음악적 지식장르 특성, 곡의 분위기, 연주자의 터치 2.. 메이킹 필름 기사가 제출한 8분여 분량의 메이킹 필름을 보면 감독은 13번 신 도입부를 설명하면서 양손으로 피해자의 뺨을 때리는 연기를 지시했다.. All video and photo by fc2 한국 에로메이킹 search keyword..

.트 릴리 영화

Tv › video › 495114미스맥심 첼설아 메이킹 필름 korean porn vip, Fc2 한국 에로메이킹 отборное порно на xgroovy. Eporner is the largest hd. `조덕제 성추행 사건` 여배우 측 문제의 13번신, 에로신. 대한민국 스타 에로배우 도모세는 왜 28살 이른 나이에 은퇴했는가. 이메일박진위의 야구장씬으로 유명한 하소연의 에로명작단편콜렉션 에로콩트본편이 15분짜리 옴니버스인데 메이킹을보니 이걸 찍는데는 상상이외로 많은 시간과인원,예산,장비등이 들어갔음을 알수가있습니다.

05.avsee.ur 즐겨찾기 찜하기와 편리한 시청기록 관리로 나만의 맞춤형 비디오 라이브러리를 만끽하세요. 아이엠돌 레알터치수아 메이킹영상 av에로배우수아 출연. 1일 유튜브 찬우박은 유튜브 검열이 사실. Com › search › 에로+메이킹에로 메이킹 야동 xhamster. Com › search › fc2한국에로메이킹xxx видео fc2 한국 에로메이킹. 2bisiri porn

20대 자다가 오줌 디시 간단한 녹음믹싱 지식컴프레서, eq, 게인 스테이징 등 4. 형식이나 시간에 구애받지않고 촬영 장면,ng컷,배우들의 모습이나 인터뷰. 이메일박진위의 야구장씬으로 유명한 하소연의 에로명작단편콜렉션 에로콩트본편이 15분짜리 옴니버스인데 메이킹을보니 이걸 찍는데는 상상이외로 많은 시간과인원,예산,장비등이 들어갔음을 알수가있습니다. 에로 ng파일 2라는 제목의 메이킹필름도있습니다. Tv › video › 495114미스맥심 첼설아 메이킹 필름 korean porn vip. 07케인 디시

314_514_414 porn 0218 중국 고전 포르노 영화, 아시아 러브 메이킹 비디오. Watch 무삭제에로영화 섹스공동구역 강추15분경 다보임 on spankbang now. Watch 무삭제에로영화 섹스공동구역 강추15분경 다보임 on spankbang now. 아이엠돌 레알터치수아 메이킹영상 av에로배우수아 출연. 2012년 7월 25일 에 워너뮤직 재팬 에서 발매되었다. 3077159

18sai4 Kobis에서는 영화정보를 체계적으로 관리하고 전국 영화상영관의 발권정보를 집계하기 위해 영화정보통합관리 영화표준식별코드fims를 생성 및 배포부여하고 read more. 그 많은 스킬중에서 『펠라치오』라는 스킬을 찾아낸 그는. Com búsqueda fc2 한국 에로메이킹, página 4, vídeos de sexo gratis. 음악적 지식장르 특성, 곡의 분위기, 연주자의 터치 2. 형식이나 시간에 구애받지않고 촬영 장면,ng컷,배우들의 모습이나 인터뷰.

18岁 pikpak Com búsqueda fc2 한국 에로메이킹, página 4, vídeos de sexo gratis. 일자리를 구하기도 어렵고 해서 에로배우를 해보고 싶은데, 방법을 모르겠습니다. 형식이나 시간에 구애받지않고 촬영 장면,ng컷,배우들의 모습이나 인터뷰. Kobis에서는 영화정보를 체계적으로 관리하고 전국 영화상영관의 발권정보를 집계하기 위해 영화정보통합관리 영화표준식별코드fims를 생성 및 배포부여하고 read more. 에로 새내기 남자배우 양대선과 배우 지망생 전은아가 보고겪는 그쪽세계의 이야기 채련이 정상급 에로배우로,김경주는 전은아의 술집베프로,김도빈과.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.