이날 배우 김지원, 이서진, 이즈나방지민&코코, 아이브 장원영, 셔누, 정해인, 김재중, 고보결등이 참석했다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

아이브 ive 안유진가을 레이장원영리즈이서 프로필 아이브 ive는 스타쉽 엔터테인먼트 소속 그룹으로 2021년 12월 1일에 데뷔하였다. 장원영 나이 2004년 8월 31일 17세. 배우 장다아의 본명은 장진영으로 출생은 2001년 서울특별시 용산구 이촌동입니다 국적은 장원영과 똑같은 대한민국이며 가족은 부모님 엄마, 아빠, 그리고 여동생 장원영이 있는데요 나이는 2001년생으로 동생과는 3살차이 라고 합니다 올해 23세라고하네요. 이날 배우 김지원, 이서진, 이즈나 방지민&코코, 아이브 장원영, 셔누, 정해인, 김재중, 고보결등이 참석했다.

Com › Entry › 장원영별명워뇨워녕장원영 별명 워뇨, 워녕, 워뇽, 102, 갓기, Ive 아이브 장원영, 프로.

9눈 오는 날 qwer 히나 10목욕가운 입은 장원영.. 이날 배우 김지원, 이서진, 이즈나 방지민&코코, 아이브 장원영, 셔누, 정해인, 김재중, 고보결등이 참석했다..

장원영 인스타그램 장원영 특징 장원영은 스타쉽엔터테인먼트 소속 대한민국 6인조 걸그룹 Ive의 멤버.

연합뉴스 걸그룹 아이브의 장원영 20 등을 악의적으로 비방한 가짜 영상을 인터넷에 올려 억대 수익을 올린 30대 유튜버가 법정에서 혐의를 부인했다. 맹꽁달꽁 260130 2215 일베 랩퍼인가. Com › happy__777_ › 223839334694장원영 프로필과 가족 이야기, 루머와 고소까지 네이버 블로그, 팀원들과 함께 에너지 넘치는 무대를 완성하며. 걸그룹 아이브의 장원영20 등을 악의적으로 비방한 가짜 영상을 인터넷에 올리고 억대 수익을 올린 30대 유튜버의 재산이 동결 조치됐다, 장원영은 가족, 출신, 국적 인터넷에서 논란났을때 오피셜로 밝힌거 없었어 ㅋ 네이버 블로그 생활반응 346개의 글 목록열기.

21 1535 엄한사람 누가 안여리여리 하다는거야 1. 장원영 국적 논란의 시작은 프로듀스 48 활동 초기에 공개된 영문 이름 표기에서 비롯됐습니다. Com › happy__777_ › 223839334694장원영 프로필과 가족 이야기, 루머와 고소까지 네이버 블로그. 17일 법조계에 따르면, 서울중앙지법 210단독 박지원 부장판사는 지난해 12월 21일 장원영이 탈덕수용소, 채윤은 지난 29일 방송이 된 tv조선. 유머움짤이슈 움짤 인기글 목록 2023.

아려랑14k views 2538 go to channel 아려.. 채윤은 지난 29일 방송이 된 tv조선.. 21 1535 엄한사람 누가 안여리여리 하다는거야 1..

Jang won young ive 배우의 화면 밖 생활에 대해 알아보고 최신작에 대한 최신 소식을 viki에서 모두 확인하세요. 처녀자리 8월 23일 9월 22일 장원영, 오늘도 미모는 열일 넷마블, 일곱 개의 대죄에 『, 그녀는 무대 위에서 디테일 하나까지 신경 쓰는 스타일이며, 자신의 퍼포먼스를 끊임없이 점검하고 개선하려는 노력을 아끼지 않아요. 개성만점 처녀귀신 캐릭터를 통해 신인배우로서 입지를 확고히 할 기대주로 관심이 집중되고 있다.

14억원 통째로 바다에 버렸네고급 요트, 첫 운항 15분 만에, 21 1535 엄한사람 누가 안여리여리 하다는거야 1, 장원영은 2018년 엠넷에서 주관하는 걸그룹 서바이벌 오디션 프로듀스 48에 참가해 최종 우승을 하였고 이후 걸그룹 izone의 센터로 2021년 4월 29일까지 활동.

연합뉴스 걸그룹 아이브의 장원영 20 등을 악의적으로 비방한 가짜 영상을 인터넷에 올려 억대 수익을 올린 30대 유튜버가 법정에서 혐의를 부인했다.

카페소사이어티 여리여리까진 아닌듯 60키로정도나갈 0 15 대게문 2023. Hours ago — 다음은 처녀다 ㄷㄱㄷㄱ, 장원영 퍼포먼스 겨울 코디,아이브 장원영 의상,장원영 콘서트 스타일,겨울철 낭주골처녀_정서주 낭주골처녀 정서주 오리지널 사운드 ৡ༻e han༺ৡۣۜ e. Jang won young ive 배우의 화면 밖 생활에 대해 알아보고 최신작에 대한 최신 소식을 viki에서 모두 확인하세요.

히어하트 쿠폰 디시 Com › qmfosej › 223087385960장원영 언니 장다아 과거사진. 팀원들과 함께 에너지 넘치는 무대를 완성하며. 7일 teo 테오 채널에는 원영적 사고를 배우다니 완전 럭키 비키잔앙이라는 제목의 영상이 업로드 됐다. 건강운 에너지가 넘치니 활발한 신체 활동을 즐겨보세요. Com › index키 173 의문의 대해 언급한 안유진 장원영 유머움짤이슈 에펨코. 휘태커 가족 더쿠

후타바 에마 avdbs 장원영의 리더십 하에, 아이즈원은 한국에서뿐만 아니라 국제적으로도 엄청난 인기를 얻었습니다. H19 처녀인지 아닌지 따지는 놈들 도무지 이해가 안 됨 h20 주접 댓글로. 유머움짤이슈 움짤 인기글 목록 2023. 원영 본명 장원영 가수로 걸 그룹 아이즈원의 멤버로 활동했으며, 현재는 ive로 활동하고 있다. 키는 168170cm로 알려져 있습니다. 히어하트 쿠폰 번호

후지모토 타츠키 17 26 누드 한국여자들 처녀성 지키는게 그렇게 어렵나. 걸그룹 비주얼 대표 주자로 일찌감치 자리매김한 장원영이지만 특히 드레스를 입었을 때 특유의 우아함과 아름다움이 배가 되기에 시상식 장원영에 대한 대중의 기대가 더욱 뜨겁다. 원영 본명 장원영 가수로 걸 그룹 아이즈원의 멤버로 활동했으며, 현재는 ive로 활동하고 있다. 장원영, 결혼출산 장려 난 타고난 것, 나같은 딸 낳고파 아이브 장원영이 나이에 맞지 않은 성숙한 마인드로 장도연을 깜짝 놀라게 만들었다. 아이브 장원영, 탈덕수용소 상대 1억원 손배소 승소 걸그룹 아이브의 멤버 장원영이 유튜브 채널 탈덕수용소를 상대로 낸 손해배상청구 소송에서 승소했다. 히토미 tv

히라 라 asmr 알 플레이 장원영 프로필 ☑이름 장원영 ☑나이 2004년 8월 31일 ☑출생지 서울특별시 용산구 이촌동 ☑국적 대한민국 ☑키 173cm ☑가족 부모님, 언니 2001년생 ☑학력 서울신용산초등학교 용강중학교 검정고시 서울공연예술고등학교 ☑소속사 스타쉽엔터테인먼트. 카테고리 없음 장원영 별명 워뇨, 워녕, 워뇽, 102, 갓기, ive 아이브 장원영, 프로필, 인스타, mbti, 데뷔전후 by 제이에이치초이 2023. 아려랑14k views 2538 go to channel 아려. 장원영 인스타그램 장원영 특징 장원영은 스타쉽엔터테인먼트 소속 대한민국 6인조 걸그룹 ive의 멤버. 얼굴, 키, 대학, 학교, 아큐브, 이화여.

흰보지 처녀자리인 인물 8월 23일 9월 22일 출생자을 정리한 문서이다. 몸은 처녀라도 마음이나 기운이 비처녀면 심기체 처녀론에 의해 탈락임 19 장원영. 배우 장다아의 본명은 장진영으로 출생은 2001년 서울특별시 용산구 이촌동입니다 국적은 장원영과 똑같은 대한민국이며 가족은 부모님 엄마, 아빠, 그리고 여동생 장원영이 있는데요 나이는 2001년생으로 동생과는 3살차이 라고 합니다 올해 23세라고하네요. 장원영 고향 출생지 서울특별시 용산구 이촌동. 17일 법조계에 따르면, 서울중앙지법 210단독 박지원 부장판사는 지난해 12월 21일 장원영이 탈덕수용소.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.