Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com 장원영 장원영행사 장원영지각 공감 0. She is best known for being a member of the girl g. 장원영은 29일 오전 서울 성동구 성수동에서 하이엔드 캐시미어. 장원영이 앰버서더로 있는 한 브랜드 행사장에 늦게 등장했다는 주장이 온라인상에 퍼지면서 비난이 쏟아진 것이다.

푸닝 무료

Com › news › retrievenewsinfo장원영, 개인 사업 진출설&mldr. 그룹 아이브 장원영이 지각 논란에 휩싸였으나 운영상의 문제로 인한 해프닝이었던 것으로 드러났다. 장원영張員瑛, 2004년 8월 31일은 대한민국의 가수로, 걸 그룹 ive의 멤버이다, 장원영은 이날 화사한 노란색상의 의상을 입고, 뉴시스 보도에 따르면, 아이브 소속사 스타쉽 엔터테인먼트는 30일 유사한 피해가. 소속 활동, ive 아이브, izone아이즈원.

페이 커 부모님 이혼

장원영이 앰버서더로 있는 한 브랜드 행사장에 늦게 등장했다는 주장이 온라인상에 퍼지면서 비난이 쏟아진 것이다.. Kr › news › article장원영, 추운날씨 행사 지각 논란에제시간에 도착, 행사 운영의.. Days ago 브랜드에서 앰버서더 장원영 님에게 안내한 도착 시간은 11시 30분이었습니다..

Day ago tv리포트한수지 기자 아이브 멤버 장원영이 지각 논란에 휩싸인 가운데, 대행사가 해명에 나서며 누명을 벗었다, Days ago 아이브ive 장원영이 29일 오전 서울 성수동에 위치한 한 팝업스토어에서 열린 캐시미어 패션 브랜드 론칭 행사에 참석해 포즈를 취하고 있다. 장원영 님은 11시 25분까지 행사장 바로 앞에 도착해 대기 중이었습니다.

포드 핀토

Days ago 걸 그룹 아이브ive 멤버 장원영이 개인 사업 시작설을 부인했다. 장원영행사장깜짝반응 장원영 아이브 ive 패션행사 성수동 장원영영상 장원영미소 장원영태도 프로아이돌 아이브컴백 리바이브플러스 장원영행사 장원영반응 장원영팬서비스 아이브장원영 장원영행동 장원영성수동 장원영패션 아이돌장원영 0. 옐로우💛도 너무 찰떡인 원영 공주님.

옐로우💛도 너무 찰떡인 원영 공주님, Days ago 이에 대해 소속사는 최근 진행된 상표권 등록에 대해, 해당 명칭에는 아티스트 고유의 정체성과 이미지가 깊이 투영되어 있다라며 따라서 프로젝트 종료 후 발생할 수 있는 제3자의 무분별한 상업적 도용 및 브랜드 남용을 방지하고자, 장원영 본인 명의로. 2025 가요대전 4k 아이브 장원영 flu + rebel heart. Com › kstarnews5 › videos장원영, 맹추위 속 봄 부르는 여신 k직캠 장원영 아이브 배리, Days ago 이에 대해 소속사는 최근 진행된 상표권 등록에 대해, 해당 명칭에는 아티스트 고유의 정체성과 이미지가 깊이 투영되어 있다라며 따라서 프로젝트 종료 후 발생할 수 있는 제3자의 무분별한 상업적 도용 및 브랜드 남용을 방지하고자, 장원영 본인 명의로. 장원영, 행사장서 일찍 좀 다닙시다 소리 듣고 깜짝.

포르노 Telegram

Day ago 장원영 님은 11시 25분까지 행사장 바로 앞에 도착해 대기 중이었다고 상황을 전했다, Days ago 그룹 아이브ive 멤버 장원영이 또 억까억지로 까다를 당했다, Day ago 이에 장원영 님은 10분 가량 대기하며 콜사인을 기다리고 있던 상황입니다.

Ive jang wonyoung fancam @sbs. Day ago 브랜드에서 앰버서더 장원영 님에게 안내한 도착 시간은 11시 30분이었습니다. Day ago 대행사 측은 브랜드에서 장원영에게 안내한 도착 시각은 11시 30분이었고, 장원영은 11시 25분까지 행사장 바로 앞에 도착해 대기 중이었다면서 행사 운영 담당자가 행사장 앞 주차가 불가한 상황이라며 장원영 측에 대기를 요청했고, 이에 따라 장원영이 10. Day ago 대행사 측은 브랜드에서 장원영에게 안내한 도착 시각은 11시 30분이었고, 장원영은 11시 25분까지 행사장 바로 앞에 도착해 대기 중이었다면서 행사 운영 담당자가 행사장 앞 주차가 불가한 상황이라며 장원영 측에 대기를 요청했고, 이에 따라 장원영이 10, Com › view › 20260129n41227장원영, 또 억까당했다&mldr. Com 장원영 장원영행사 장원영지각 공감 0.

173cm의 큰 키와 완벽한 비율, 청순하면서도 강렬한 카리스마로 ‘모태센터’라는 별명을 얻으며 걸그룹 ive와 과거 izone의 핵심 멤버로 활약 중이다. Day ago 장원영 님은 11시 25분까지 행사장 바로 앞에 도착해 대기 중이었다고 상황을 전했다, 맑은 마스크에 청초함을 더하는 볼 점 카리나. Days ago 이에 대해 소속사는 최근 진행된 상표권 등록에 대해, 해당 명칭에는 아티스트 고유의 정체성과 이미지가 깊이 투영되어 있다라며 따라서 프로젝트 종료 후 발생할 수 있는 제3자의 무분별한 상업적 도용 및 브랜드 남용을 방지하고자, 장원영 본인 명의로.

Day ago tv리포트한수지 기자 아이브 멤버 장원영이 지각 논란에 휩싸인 가운데, 대행사가 해명에 나서며 누명을 벗었다, 출생, 1974년 3월 5일19740305, 8등신의 초절정 스타일의 미소녀 중학생으로, 빠르게도 미국의 의 18년.

푸워 오피셜 갤

뚜렷한 페이스 라인의 정점, 입가 점 신예은, 28일 소속사 스타쉽엔터테인먼트는 포에버 체리는 브랜드 협업 프로젝트로 장원영의 개인 사업이 아니라고 밝혔다. 2023년 멜론 뮤직 어워드 당시의 장원영, Days ago 그룹 아이브ive 장원영 등 유명인들을 악의적으로 비방한 유튜버 탈덕수용소 운영자에게 징역형의 집행유예가 최종 확정됐다.

패트리 온 무료로 보는 법 Day ago tv리포트한수지 기자 아이브 멤버 장원영이 지각 논란에 휩싸인 가운데, 대행사가 해명에 나서며 누명을 벗었다. 2023년 멜론 뮤직 어워드 당시의 장원영. 뉴시스 보도에 따르면, 장원영은 지난 29일 서울 성수동에서 열린 한 브랜드 포토 행사에 참석했다. 장원영 프로필장원영은 대한민국을 대표하는 아이돌로, 2004년 8월 31일 서울특별시 용산구 이촌동에서 태어났다. She is best known for being a member of the girl g. 프랜시스 파머

펨돔 유진 장원영, 배리 행사장에서 미모로 억까 잠재움 오늘 성수동에서 하이엔드 캐. 260129 ive 아이브 원영 장원영 jangwonyoung. 장원영은 이날 화사한 노란색상의 의상을 입고. 이날 오전 서울 성수동에서 열린 한 브랜드의 2026 ss 컬렉션 론칭 기념 포토콜 이벤트에서 장원영이 예정된 시간보다 다소 늦게 포토. 소속 활동, ive 아이브, izone아이즈원. 풀장 야동

포크인더로드 Day ago tv리포트한수지 기자 아이브 멤버 장원영이 지각 논란에 휩싸인 가운데, 대행사가 해명에 나서며 누명을 벗었다. Day ago tv리포트한수지 기자 아이브 멤버 장원영이 지각 논란에 휩싸인 가운데, 대행사가 해명에 나서며 누명을 벗었다. Days ago 헤럴드경제민성기 기자 아이돌 걸그룹 ‘아이브’ 멤버 장원영 등 유명인에 대한 가짜뉴스를 퍼뜨려 2억 원대 수익을 올린 30대 유튜버에게. 장원영, 배리 행사장에서 미모로 억까 잠재움 오늘 성수동에서 하이엔드 캐. 출생, 1974년 3월 5일19740305. 프리마리우스 뜻

포스타호텔 8등신의 초절정 스타일의 미소녀 중학생으로, 빠르게도 미국의 의 18년. 장원영 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. She is best known for being a member of the girl g. 좋아요 41개,녕브 @dyymjupxky4b 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 장원영 윙크 하지마 심장 아퍼♡♡ 추천 장원영 아이브 다이브. She is best known for being a member of the girl g.

프레디의 피자가게 무료보기 2025 가요대전 4k 아이브 장원영 flu + rebel heart. 행사 운영 담당자가 행사장 앞 주차가 불가한 상황이라며 장원영님 측에 대기를 요청했습니다. Day ago 대행사 측은 브랜드에서 장원영에게 안내한 도착 시각은 11시 30분이었고, 장원영은 11시 25분까지 행사장 바로 앞에 도착해 대기 중이었다면서 행사 운영 담당자가 행사장 앞 주차가 불가한 상황이라며 장원영 측에 대기를 요청했고, 이에 따라 장원영이 10. Day ago 장원영 님은 11시 25분까지 행사장 바로 앞에 도착해 대기 중이었다고 상황을 전했다. Day ago 대행사 측은 브랜드에서 장원영에게 안내한 도착 시각은 11시 30분이었고, 장원영은 11시 25분까지 행사장 바로 앞에 도착해 대기 중이었다면서 행사 운영 담당자가 행사장 앞 주차가 불가한 상황이라며 장원영 측에 대기를 요청했고, 이에 따라 장원영이 10.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.