설리, 응급실에 최자와 동행더팩트ㅣ강수지 인턴기자 그룹 에프엑스 출신 배우 설리22본명 최진리가 만취 상태로 응급실을 다녀갔을 당시 연인인 힙합 그룹 다이나믹 듀오 멤버 최자36본명 최재호가 동행한 것으로 취재결과 확인됐다.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

설리 인스타 댓글보면 ㅇ을했니부터 시작해서 이상하다는둥 과잉반응이 너무 많아서 저는 놀랬어요. 아직도 실감이 안 나네요 행복하겠죠 지금은. 마지막 사진도 아이유가 설리 만들어준거에요. 여신ㅠㅠㅠㅠ 진짜 제일예쁜거같아 설리10년 전 김준면 아내 이뻐짱부러움10년 전 로그인 후 댓글을 달아보세요 카테고리 초록글 l hot 1 3 키보드 닉네임 날짜 조회 이슈소식 현재 반응갈리는 훠궈 프랜차이즈.

유머감동 이슈소식 정보기타 뮤직 국내 수지, 설리, 혜리, 홍유경, 손나은 고등학교 졸업사진.

갓 성인인데 14살 연상은 진짜 좀 그랬어 누굴 탓하는게 아니라 정말 맞는 말이야 스무살 여자애랑 34살 남자의 세계는.. 지독한 악성 루머를 끈질지게 퍼뜨렸던 악플러였다..

폭주하는 설리 인스타 10장 ㄷㄷㄷㄷ8.

세계일보는 정론직필의 정신을 바탕으로 신속하고 정확한 보도, 공정한 논평, 깊이 있는 분석을 통해 독자들에게 다양한 정보와 지식을 제공하겠습니다. 잡고 보니 설리와 당시 동갑21살인 명문대학교에 다니던 여학생이었다, 인스타라이브에서 악플 읽던 설리표정변화. 강력반 형사의 의문사 편집 사건이 일어난 날은 뙤약볕이 심하게 내리쬐던 2010년 7월 29일이었다. 본인은 매번 뒤에서 이 상황을 방관하기만 했지.

유머감동 이슈소식 정보기타 뮤직 국내 수지, 설리, 혜리, 홍유경, 손나은 고등학교 졸업사진, Insta 인스티즈 instiz 이슈 카테, 설리, 응급실에 최자와 동행더팩트ㅣ강수지 인턴기자 그룹 에프엑스 출신 배우 설리22본명 최진리가 만취 상태로 응급실을 다녀갔을 당시 연인인 힙합 그룹 다이나믹 듀오 멤버 최자36본명 최재호가 동행한 것으로 취재결과 확인됐다. 서울에 집과 직장이 있는 그가 뜬금없이, 충청북도 영동군 에 위치한 어느 낚시터에서 낚시꾼 민씨가 남성의 시신 1구를 발견했다.

Com T7rpeausbg6vsjigeipqbcwxvpznb7i3oi 단독 설리, 6월말 음원 깜짝 발표데뷔 14년 만에 첫 솔로곡 Sinstiz.

피드백조차 없는 일방적인 상황에 팬들은 모두 지쳤음. 우리는 종현이나 설리나 하라를 잃고도 조금도 나아지지 않았습니다. 아직도 실감이 안 나네요 행복하겠죠 지금은.

아내 잃은 남편은 홀아비, 남편 잃은 아내는 과부, 부모 잃은 자식은 고아라고 하지만, 자식 잃은 부모를 일컫는 단어는 없다라는 read more.. 본인은 매번 뒤에서 이 상황을 방관하기만 했지.. 설리크리스탈 모바일 밤모드 이용시 인기글.. 잡고 보니 설리와 당시 동갑21살인 명문대학교에 다니던 여학생이었다..

오늘 설리 인스타에올라온글인데 징짱이 설리한데 미역국도해주고 밥을해준듯 작년이랑 재작년에도 아이유가 본인집인지.

The castle of zoltar shining. 이 글은 12년 전 2013710 게시물이에요. + 설리 웨이보 인간복숭아ㅠㅠ 설리 쎄씨 7월호 커버걸 로마 화보 인스티즈.

짜미 유륜 이 글은 12년 전 2013710 게시물이에요. + 설리 웨이보 인간복숭아ㅠㅠ 설리 쎄씨 7월호 커버걸 로마 화보 인스티즈. 우리는 종현이나 설리나 하라를 잃고도 조금도 나아지지 않았습니다. 시신의 신원은 강남경찰서 강력반 소속 이용준 형사로 밝혀졌다. 충청북도 영동군 에 위치한 어느 낚시터에서 낚시꾼 민씨가 남성의 시신 1구를 발견했다. 짐승녀 미드

쥬엔 디시 ㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠ마워할수가없다 설리9년 전 뭐할너라ㅣ너라ㅣ널ㄴ 한거이쁘다9년 전 투하트 키 샤이니 키 중간에 샤이니 사진을 본건 기분탓인가요. 언니한테서 장미꽃다발든 스님이 절간에서 담배피우는 냄새나요 1. 이 글은 12년 전 2013710 게시물이에요. 살빠진 오늘 설리 인스티즈instiz 이슈 카테고리. 언니한테서 장미꽃다발든 스님이 절간에서 담배피우는 냄새나요 1. 지읒 asmr

짤랑이 팬더 갓 성인인데 14살 연상은 진짜 좀 그랬어 누굴 탓하는게 아니라 정말 맞는 말이야 스무살 여자애랑 34살 남자의 세계는. 해당 사건으로 문제의 기사를 작성한 기자의 이름이 실시한 검색어에 올라 관련 기사가 쏟아졌으나 현재는 모두 삭제되었다. 아직도 실감이 안 나네요 행복하겠죠 지금은. 그리고 설리가 한창 대중에게 조롱받았을 때 그와 친하다는 이유만으로 함께 비난했던 것을 생각하면 끔찍함. 내 맘대로 sm베스트 피플설리의 차트7. 쯔위 언더붑

중국 섹트 디시 또, 설리 하나로 인해 1년만의 정규활동중단+리팩키지 취소+그룹이미지 실추 등 네멤버와 팬들은 많은 피해를 입었음. 잡고 보니 설리와 당시 동갑21살인 명문대학교에 다니던 여학생이었다. 그리고 여행다니고 sns하는 게 문제라고 한 적 없습니다. 옷이 귀족같은데도 이쁘네여 역시 ㅠㅠ 설리는 검은색 잘 안. ㅠㅠㅠㅠㅠ마워할수가없다 설리9년 전 뭐할너라ㅣ너라ㅣ널ㄴ 한거이쁘다9년 전 투하트 키 샤이니 키 중간에 샤이니 사진을 본건 기분탓인가요.

종말의 얼터에고이즘 치트 피드백조차 없는 일방적인 상황에 팬들은 모두 지쳤음. 아내 잃은 남편은 홀아비, 남편 잃은 아내는 과부, 부모 잃은 자식은 고아라고 하지만, 자식 잃은 부모를 일컫는 단어는 없다라는 read more. 나도 스크랩하기 카카오톡 공유 유명한 설리와 피오 썰. 옛날부터 드라마나 영화 촬영장에서 여배우한테 현장에서 노출씬 찍는 걸 갑작스레 고지해서 강요해서 찍는 문제들이 있었는데 최근에까지도 이런 일이 read more. Com › instiz › posts인스티즈 instiz 단독 설리, 6월말 음원 깜짝 발표데뷔 14년.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.