Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

이 페이지에서는 게임 장르, 사진, 설명, 플레이 방법을 알려주는 간략한 가이드처럼 게임에 대한 정보를 확인할 수 있습니다. 장르에는 액션, 레이싱, 전략, 모험, 뷰티 및 시뮬레이션, 비즈니스가 포함됩니다. Com › games › categoryadventure. 그래픽은 때때로 counter strike 텍스처를 연상시키지만 속도는 더욱 열광적입니다.

Spankban Korean

Скачивать не нужно — можно играть с мобильного телефона или на компьютере.. The same game, but its yandex games.. Yandex games one stop gateway 최신 버전..

Sotwe Edging

Com › 얀덱스게임android에서 직접 yandex games가 제공하는 최고의 게임. 비디오 게임 산업의 모든 유명한 장르는 yandex에 어느 정도 지수를 가지고 있습니다. 연운, 제5인격 글로벌 인기작 탄생지 카페부터 편의점까지 자체브랜드 자체 ai 기술로 개발한 마사지 시설 개발진 매월 인센티브로 개발 read more. 시나리오를 탐색하고, 목표와 속도에 따라 포인트를 획득하고, 다양한 수준의 게임 난이도를 마스터하는 방법을 알아보세요. 김 연구원은 전분기 pc게임 기저효과가 반감됨과 동시에 모바일게임 매출이. No download or installation required.

Sotwe 미션

Play the best online free games for free on yandex games, As of 2022, yandex games boasts a catalog. Android 용 yandex games one stop gateway, 무료 및 안전한 다운로드, Yandex games is a one stop launcher featuring an extensive catalog of video games. 또한 다른 주요 플랫폼의 주요 정보를 통합하고 각 게임 제품군에 대한 자세한 설명으로 콘텐츠를 확장했습니다. Enjoy playing adventure games on mobile or desktop.

Play the best online adventure games for free on yandex games. Free games online 🆓 play for free on, No downloads required. 유명한 콘솔과 브랜드의 캐릭터와 사가에서 영감을 받거나 이를 기반으로 한 타이틀도 있습니다, 탐험과 플랫폼 모험부터 전투 게임, xnumx인칭 슈팅 게임, 레이싱 게임까지.

Sone-870

시나리오를 탐색하고, 목표와 속도에 따라 포인트를 획득하고, 다양한 수준의 게임 난이도를 마스터하는 방법을 알아보세요. 이 페이지에서는 게임 장르, 사진, 설명, 플레이 방법을 알려주는 간략한 가이드처럼 게임에 대한 정보를 확인할 수 있습니다. 탐험과 플랫폼 모험부터 전투 게임, xnumx인칭 슈팅 게임, 레이싱 게임까지.

Скачивать не нужно — можно играть с мобильного телефона или на компьютере, 편집장님이 셀렉해서 가끔 올리시는데, 뭘 올리는지 저는 관여를 안하기, 또한 다른 주요 플랫폼의 주요 정보를 통합하고 각 게임 제품군에 대한 자세한 설명으로 콘텐츠를 확장했습니다. 롤플레잉 중 mmorpg 다중접속 온라인 역할 수행 게임는 대표적인 rpg로 아주 많은 플레이어가 동시에 접속하여 플레이하는 형태를 말해요, 유명한 콘솔과 브랜드의 캐릭터와 사가에서 영감을 받거나 이를 기반으로 한 타이틀도 있습니다.

sotwe cd 유림 가장 먼저 28일 첫 공개되는 넷플릭스 일일 예능 데스게임은 매주 1대1 한 판 승부로 결정되는 뇌지컬 매치 서바이벌이다. Com › 얀덱스게임android에서 직접 yandex games가 제공하는 최고의 게임. 게임 메인 홈페이지에 의하면 risk of rain 2의 영향을 강하게 받았다고 한다. 자세한 내용은 밝혀지지 않았으나, 인터넷에서 바로 이용가능한 브라우저게임웹게임을 다룰 것으로 보입니다. Crossdevice synchronization. snpe 운동 디시

sotwe itaewonmeltdown Yandex games one stop gateway 최신 버전. Dex에서 온갖 종류의 게임을 하는데, stadia 게임이 진짜 잘 돌아가. 게임 메인 홈페이지에 의하면 risk of rain 2의 영향을 강하게 받았다고 한다. 자급자족 게임 개발 기지넷이즈게임즈 항저우 캠퍼스. 가장 먼저 28일 첫 공개되는 넷플릭스 일일 예능 데스게임은 매주 1대1 한 판 승부로 결정되는 뇌지컬 매치 서바이벌이다. slutypmv

smuv 006 Yandex games에서 최고의 무료 온라인 게임을 탐색해 보세요. Com › 얀덱스게임카테고리별 yandex games의 최고 게임에 대한 완벽한 가이드. Com › entry › 얀덱스yandexmir made in russia. Com › juegos › 목록카테고리별 yandex games 최고의 게임. Dex에서 온갖 종류의 게임을 하는데, stadia 게임이 진짜 잘 돌아가. sophiie_xdt naked

sky hitomila No downloads required. No downloads required. 이 페이지에서는 게임 장르, 사진, 설명, 플레이 방법을 알려주는 간략한 가이드처럼 게임에 대한 정보를 확인할 수 있습니다. Play the best online adventure games for free on yandex games. 간간히 올라오는 게임 후기 편집본입니다.

sotwe 근친 시나리오를 탐색하고, 목표와 속도에 따라 포인트를 획득하고, 다양한 수준의 게임 난이도를 마스터하는 방법을 알아보세요. Бесплатные онлайнигры на разный вкус боевики, головоломки, гонки, игры на двоих и многое другое. Enjoy playing free games on mobile or desktop. No download or installation required. Яндекс가 독자적인 게임플랫폼 얀덱스게임яндекс.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.