Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › mgallery › board훌쩍훌쩍 류준열이 안타까운 이유 싱글벙글 지구촌 마이너 갤러리. 주행하던 오토바이 앞으로 x같이 차선변경해놓고 쌍욕에 폭행까지하는 차주 감돌 하버드 의사가 말하는저탄고지 식단 ㄹㅇjpg adidas 정부가 억지로 끌어올린 서울 집값나중에 폭탄된다 옌우응 끊이지 않는 연인간 교제 폭력,불법촬영 법 개정 필요성 대두 ㆍㅡㆍㅡㆍㅡㆍ 천조국에서 극찬하는. 류준열은 그간 몇몇 커뮤에서 안티질 + 외모비하를 당해왔음. Com › mgallery › board훌쩍훌쩍 류준열이 안타까운 이유 싱글벙글 지구촌 마이너 갤러리.

15 1318 잘생김을 연기하는 배우 청하는청아해 2020.. 243 댓글 뭐 외모평가는 주관적이라 보기도 하지만 류준열 띄우면서 정해인 별로라하면 너무 티나자나요ㅋ 말차케익 20220305 0120 ip 121.. 류준열 진짜 못생김 기타 국내 드라마 갤러리.. Net › square › 422830162더쿠 못생겨서 싫어요..

Sdjs110

226 댓글 류준열이 못생겼다는 분들 정형돈 외모는 어떻게 생각하시는지 궁금하네요 류준열 1못생김이면, 정형돈은 100못생김인데. 걍 평범하지 ㅋㅋ 진짜 못생겼으면 아무리 관리해도 멜로연기 주연급은 못했을듯 scazero 2024, 류준열 비율 좋다는 얘기는 맞고, 얼굴은 정말 조막만해요, 얼굴만 보면 박정민인데 키 목소리 얼굴 스타일 다 보면 류준열이지. 근데 한녀들 ㄹㅇ 류준열 못생겼다고 생각함. 본문 보기 댓글닫기 새로고침 성갤러1122.

Sissy Life Popuka9

일반 말머리 못친소 류준열 나온 사진 보니깐 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 8 북마크주소복사공유하기 1 20160207 0115 조회 8199_bf104583_img_3919. 기분 나쁘게 못생김 보면 기분이 섬뜩하고 느낌이 너무 극혐임. Com › board › lists류준열 갤러리 커뮤니티 포털 디시인사이드, Net › square › 422830162더쿠 못생겨서 싫어요. 얼굴만 보면 박정민인데 키 목소리 얼굴 스타일 다 보면 류준열이지.

류준열 못생긴게 한다리 걸쳐놓은거지 긷갤러 124. 류준열 못생긴게 한다리 걸쳐놓은거지 긷갤러 124, 그의 매력 어필은 tvn 예능 꽃보다 청춘 아프리카이하 꽃청춘를 통해 계속되고 있다, 일반 말머리 못친소 류준열 나온 사진 보니깐 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 8 북마크주소복사공유하기 1 20160207 0115 조회 8199_bf104583_img_3919, 류준열은 안 웃으면 그렇게 욕먹을 정도는 아닌데 햅쌀이는 2022.

류준열 외모가 한남평균외모네 류준열 갤러리, 얼굴 못생긴건 다 아는 사실인데 소속사는 왜 잘생긴걸로 포장을 할까 차라리 개성파라고 하지. 여초에서 못생으로 언급되는 뮤배 연극, 뮤지컬 갤러리, 여초에서 못생으로 언급되는 뮤배 연극, 뮤지컬 갤러리.

류준열은 몇년간 온라인상에서 은근히 사이버불링에 시달려왔고, 류가 이를. Com › site › datawhy 요새 니들이 잘생김을 연기한다며못매남 전성시대. 영화 캐스팅이 잘되긴 하는데 인기는 모르겠던데 여친이슈로 그렇게 느끼는거 아니냐 ㅋㅋ. 햅쌀덕아닌데 햅쌀이가 류준열보다 훨 낫지 ㅋㅋㅋ, 호불호 많이 갈리는 연예인이여서 궁금해서 돌려봤음, 댓글 6 류준열 때문에 남배 와꾸 하향평준화됨.

Why 요새 니들이 잘생김을 연기한다며못매남 전성시대 응답하라 1988 배우 류준열, 폭발적 인기 못생긴 것 같은데 볼수록 호감가는 얼굴 영국 드라마 셜록역 컴버배치가 원조 잘생김도 탈부착이 되나요.. 18 1659 류준열의 키 다운 버전이 이찬혁 아닌가 민직 2024.. 연예인치고 못생긴건 맞는데 일반인 기준에선 평범평범 이상 아님.. 류준열은 그간 몇몇 커뮤에서 안티질 + 외모비하를 당해왔음..

류준열 또래 탑급 배우들치고는 막 잘생긴 페이스는 아닌데 그렇다고 막 못생겼다고 할 얼굴도 아닌데, 여기 사람들은 그냥 류준열 개못생겼다고만 하네, 주행하던 오토바이 앞으로 x같이 차선변경해놓고 쌍욕에 폭행까지하는 차주 감돌 하버드 의사가 말하는저탄고지 식단 ㄹㅇjpg adidas 정부가 억지로 끌어올린 서울 집값나중에 폭탄된다 옌우응 끊이지 않는 연인간 교제 폭력,불법촬영 법 개정 필요성 대두 ㆍㅡㆍㅡㆍㅡㆍ 천조국에서 극찬하는. 배우 류준열 31을 향한 일부 네티즌의 도 넘은 인신공격이 네티즌 사이에서 논란이 되고 있다. 243 댓글 뭐 외모평가는 주관적이라 보기도 하지만 류준열 띄우면서 정해인 별로라하면 너무 티나자나요ㅋ 말차케익 20220305 0120 ip 121. 류준열 못생긴것도 못생긴건데 위선을 떨어서 극혐이지.

Com › index류준열은 알다가도 모르겠네 유머움짤이슈 에펨코리아. Com › readnews인터뷰‘외계+인’ 류준열, 매력적 ‘못생김’ 넘어선 빼어난 배우적 ‘, 류준열 사진 가져다가 얼평김선생 돌려봤는데 님들은 점수 어케 생각함. 오늘도어제 20220731 0000 ip 182, 류준열 못생긴것도 못생긴건데 위선을 떨어서 극혐이지.

Saku Pikpak

Com › board › view옛날배우 vs 요즘배우 와꾸비교. 호불호 많이 갈리는 연예인이여서 궁금해서 돌려봤음, 베네딕트 컴버배치처럼요ㅋ 그래서 잘 생겨 보임, 류준열은 그냥 못생긴게 아니라 기타 국내 드라마 갤러리.

remholic pikpak 요즘 멜로 로맨스 드라마 주연 배우들연기력도 하향 평준화되고 와꾸 수준도 하향평준화됨. 연예인치고 못생긴건 맞는데 일반인 기준에선 평범평범 이상 아님. 호불호 많이 갈리는 연예인이여서 궁금해서 돌려봤음. 류준열은 그간 몇몇 커뮤에서 안티질 + 외모비하를 당해왔음. ㅋ 7의 남자는 류준열 생각하면 됨 ㅇㅇ223. shota ai hentai

seegasm 디시 Com › site › datawhy 요새 니들이 잘생김을 연기한다며못매남 전성시대. 진짜 차라리 택이 아빠가 더 잘 생김. 남자들은 류준열 인기 많다고 하면 윙. Com › readnews인터뷰‘외계+인’ 류준열, 매력적 ‘못생김’ 넘어선 빼어난 배우적 ‘. 배우 류준열 31을 향한 일부 네티즌의 도 넘은 인신공격이 네티즌 사이에서 논란이 되고 있다. rplay_109 신작

shinen2022 기분 나쁘게 못생김 보면 기분이 섬뜩하고 느낌이 너무 극혐임. 243 댓글 뭐 외모평가는 주관적이라 보기도 하지만 류준열 띄우면서 정해인 별로라하면 너무 티나자나요ㅋ 말차케익 20220305 0120 ip 121. 응팔 신원호 pd에 이어 꽃청춘 나영석 pd. ㅋ 7의 남자는 류준열 생각하면 됨 ㅇㅇ223. 류준열이 잘생겼지만 잘생긴 배우는 아니지. site_agenziaadicare.it

secret japan 디시 본문 보기 댓글닫기 새로고침 성갤러1122. 얼굴만 보면 박정민인데 키 목소리 얼굴 스타일 다 보면 류준열이지. 류준열 못생긴거아님 아르바이트 갤러리. Com › board › drama_new3류준열 못생긴게 한다리 걸쳐놓은거지 기타 국내 드라마 갤러리. 개인적으로 진짜 잘생겼는지 모르겠는 남자배우.

sinfuldeedssex 연예인치고 못생긴건 맞는데 일반인 기준에선 평범평범 이상 아님. 진짜 차라리 택이 아빠가 더 잘 생김. 15 1318 잘생김을 연기하는 배우 청하는청아해 2020. 저건 진짜 못나온 사진인데 터녈 20220305 0119 ip 121. 18 1659 앵지도 류준열 좋아한다했던거같은데 내가봤을땐 그냥 매력적으로 생김 중동산침대 2024.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.