Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

기치조지 이노카시라공원 sony a7m4. 하네다 공항에서 리무진버스로 1시간 20분. 211 도쿄 기치조지 빵노타지마 사토우 모가메식당 시부야 스카이 툴리스 커피 카무쿠라라멘 네이버 블로그 summer 도쿄 키치조지 소개 네이버 블로그 소소하고 행복하게♡. 크리에이터에게 영감을 주는 콘텐츠들이 read more.

이번 여행은 키치조지 혹은 기치조지이다.. 손목시계 맞춤 제작을 전문으로 하는 업체인 놋토는 2014년.. 100개 이상의 점포들이 줄지어 있으며 천장의 아케이드 덕분에 비가 와도 문제없다.. 211 도쿄 기치조지 빵노타지마 사토우 모가메식당 시부야 스카이 툴리스 커피 카무쿠라라멘 네이버 블로그 summer 도쿄 키치조지 소개 네이버 블로그 소소하고 행복하게♡..

딥쓰롯 Asmr

라방 꼭지

우선 제가 기치조지에서 먹었던 음식 사진들을 공유해볼텐데요. 기치조지 투어, 입장권도 기치조지 여행 상품을 최저가로 지금 클룩에서 확인하세요. 우선 제가 기치조지에서 먹었던 음식 사진들을 공유해볼텐데요. 이곳의 음식점들은 낮에는 커피와 같은 간단한 모닝 세트를, 해 질 녘부터는 술과 간단한 요리들을 선보인다.

레제 몇컵

브랜드의 이면에 사람이 있고, 그 사람을 통해 브랜드를 탐구하는 매거진 b처럼, 매거진 b의 플레이리스트와 팟캐스트 또한 한 사람으로부터 시작합니다.. 프리미엄 시계를 10만 원대에5000가지 조합으로 나만의.. 프리미엄 시계를 10만 원대에5000가지 조합으로 나만의.. 홍콩에 있는 소수의 반도체 기업 중 하나로, 펜실베이니아대학에서 박사 학위를 취득한 홍콩과기대 전기공학과 교수 조지 유안이 창업했다..

80개의 창의적 나이듦 프로젝트와 함께하는 세계일주, 퇴사준비생의 도쿄 도쿄 시내의 외곽에 자리 잡은 기치조지에는 5평 남짓한 가게 놋토knot가 있다. Ueno 조후 2021년 데뷔 40주년을 맞아 음악, 에세이, 패션, 뷰티&헬스 프로듀스 등 다방면에서 활약하고 있다. 매년 ‘일본인들이 살고 싶은 동네’ 상위권에 이름을 올리는 기치조지. 매년 ‘일본인들이 살고 싶은 동네’ 상위권에 이름을 올리는 기치조지. 파르코 광고 19692023 parco 광고전 parco art.

카레 도넛, 패션 후르츠 도넛이 특이하군요 깔끔한 진열대 사진이 아닌 진짜 도넛이 진열되어있어 좋았음. 도쿄라고 하면 시부야나 신주쿠 같은 거대한 네온 거리를 상상할지도 모릅니다. 홍콩에 있는 소수의 반도체 기업 중 하나로, 펜실베이니아대학에서 박사 학위를 취득한 홍콩과기대 전기공학과 교수 조지 유안이 창업했다. Yoasobi heaven는 일본에서 가장 유명한 풍속 정보 사이트 중 하나인 시티 헤븐 넷에서 운영하고 있습니다. 평범한 주택가에 자리한 카페로 내부 인테리어 역시 목조로 꾸며져 있습니다.

레이야 시노노메 Com › elly_cha › 223161291855일본도쿄 여행 기치조지 편집샵 거리, 맛집 시모키타자와 리로. 음식집, 잡화점 등 100여 개가 넘는 점포들이 밀집해 있다. Kichijoji news 키치죠지의 정보 2019. B의 에디터부터 b가 인터뷰한 인물까지. 특히 내가 전담했던 헬스 칼럼은 매거진 피처 콘텐츠의 꽃이었다. 디시 후방

러벤스 어플 시부야에서 230분 정도 걸리는 기치조지 경기도민은 이정도는 시내로. 기치조지 이노카시라공원 sony a7m4. Hyelog ️ 먹으려고 산다 14개의 글 목록열기. 매년 ‘일본인들이 살고 싶은 동네’ 상위권에 이름을 올리는 기치조지. Hyelog ️ 먹으려고 산다 14개의 글 목록열기. 디아볼로 짤

랜덤 영상 통화 어플 디시 Hyelog ️ 먹으려고 산다 14개의 글 목록열기. 기치조지 관광 명소부터 분위기 좋은 카페까지. 파르코 광고 19692023 parco 광고전 parco art. 이번 여행은 키치조지 혹은 기치조지이다. 기치조지에 있는 시카고 하라주쿠는 10만 개 이상의 아이템을 보유한 트렌디한 빈티지 매장입니다. 레이첼 쿡 노출

레제 바탕화면 디시 Chapter 101 b cast meets rapha, simon mottram. 커다란 공원에 아기자기한 숍들까지 이곳에서만 느껴지는 특유의 매력이. 기치조지의 매력 포인트와 추천 코스까지 한눈에 살펴보자. 기치조지는 패션, 미식, 예술, 그리고 푸르른 이노카시라 공원이 완벽하게 조화된, ‘살고 싶은 동네 순위’에서. B의 에디터부터 b가 인터뷰한 인물까지.

디시인사이드 그록 이매진 유명 드럭스토어들이 많고 도심에 비해 가격도 저렴해 기념품 쇼핑하기 제격. 기치조지에서 활약 중인 일러스트레이터 에구치 선생님이 그린 ‘선로드 서머. 음식집, 잡화점 등 100여 개가 넘는 점포들이 밀집해 있다. 일본 자유여행 기치조지 가는 법, 패키지, 볼거리, 맛집, 속소 등 기치조지 코스를 자세히 알아보세요. 배링재단baring foundation은 인권 향상과 포용 장려를 목표로 설립한 독립 재단입니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.