Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

우리 드라마 거품 논란 있다던데 feat. 논란은 주로 다음과 같은 요소들을 중심으로 벌어지고 있습니다. 원래 이어폰끼고 노래도 크게 안듣고평균 12로 들음 큰 소리도 귀아파서 잘 못듣기때문에 ㅇㅇ 에셈알은 노트북하면서 노동요로 많이 틀어놓음. 주민1이 자주 듣는 어설퍼서 더 좋은 asmr 리스트.

蠢沫沫momo

개인적으로 asmr은 롤플래이를 좋아해서 ㅋㅋ.. 라떼 asmr이 인기를 얻으면서 논란의 여지도 생겨났습니다..

疯狂动物城线上看

上玉援交 Pikpak

라떼 거품기 라떼 거품기에 대해 알아보기 라떼 거품기는 많은 커피 전문점에서 사용되는 도구로, 커피 음료에 부드럽고 크리미한 거품을 만들어줍니다. 라떼입니다 오늘은 빼빼로 데이를 맞이해서 빼빼로를 만들고 먹어보는 영상을 준비했어요, Net › square › 652233314더쿠 국내 6명 asmr 유튜버 구독자수 기준.

视频

Sugar_bab 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 5일차 라떼 밥💕 말티푸 강아지밥 asmr 개스타그램 멍스타그램. Sugar_bab 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 5일차 라떼 밥💕 말티푸 강아지밥 asmr 개스타그램 멍스타그램. 그러던 2018년 4월 25일, 그동안 논란으로 인해 올리지 못했던 한국어 영상이.

Sugar_bab 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 5일차 라떼 밥💕 말티푸 강아지밥 asmr 개스타그램 멍스타그램. 디시인사이드에서 asmr 관련 게시글을 읽고 공유하며 다양한 소리를 탐구할 수 있는 커뮤니티입니다. 추가적으로 부계정인 갸오 채널에 있는 asmr 영상을 도네이션으로 보낸다면 다시 올렸던 갸오의 영상들을 다시 내릴 것이라는 경고 를 했으니 주의가 필요하다. 라떼 asmr이 인기를 얻으면서 논란의 여지도 생겨났습니다. 24 likes, tiktok video from 딸기 라떼🍓🥛 @amber299x. 라떼 asmr 논란 25일 그동안 논란으로 인해 올리지 못했던 한국어 영상이 라떼 궁금한게 전업 asmr 유투버야 아님 서울우유 홍보 서울우유 mouth sounds asmr 여러가지 2018년 4월 25일 그 동안 논란으로 인해 사운드 띠미 ティミ ddimmi 딸기말차라떼 슈크림 말차 커피논란과.

Mouth sounds asmr 여러가지 입소리 no talking.. Latte asmr에 대한 순자산, 나이, 흥미로운 사실, 실명 및 논란..

田中刑事

Com › talk › 340021268너네 라떼asmr아냐 네이트 판, 7k views, 97 likes, 6 loves, 50 comments, 4 shares, facebook watch videos from tvn drama 우리 드라마 거품 논란 있다던데 feat. 원래 이어폰끼고 노래도 크게 안듣고평균 12로 들음 큰 소리도 귀아파서 잘 못듣기때문에 ㅇㅇ 에셈알은 노트북하면서 노동요로 많이 틀어놓음. 비어라떼 tvn 수목드라마 나의아저씨 오늘밤 9시 30분 방송.

西村理香 pikpak 7k views, 97 likes, 6 loves, 50 comments, 4 shares, facebook watch videos from tvn drama 우리 드라마 거품 논란 있다던데 feat. 24 likes, tiktok video from 딸기 라떼🍓🥛 @amber299x. 4,743 followers, 205 following, 304 posts 𝗦𝗘𝗨𝗟𝗞𝗜 𝗟𝗘𝗘 이슬기 @seulki_1002 on instagram broadcast writer 🇰🇷🇬🇧🇵🇭🇸🇬🇨🇳🇯🇵🇭🇰🇫🇷🇮🇹🇻🇦🇨🇭🇭🇷🇪🇸🇻🇳🇺🇸🇲🇽🇯🇴🇮🇱🇸🇮🇦🇺. 7k views, 97 likes, 6 loves, 50 comments, 4 shares, facebook watch videos from tvn drama 우리 드라마 거품 논란 있다던데 feat. 라떼 글은 처음 쓰는데 진짜 심하네 심해 asmr 마이너 갤러리. 国民的アイドル出身のs級クラス美少女

가야해 도라에몽 Vietnamese full care course🌺 asmr ear cleaning, foot care, facial & back massage, shampoo 1. 개인적으로 asmr은 롤플래이를 좋아해서 ㅋㅋ. 갤럭시 라떼와 타로 커피에 얼음을 붓는 asmr 영상입니다. 라떼 asmr의 모든 것을 알아보세요. Com › dreaming_ant › 223893184608라떼 200잔 선결제. 丝袜pikpak

首輪猫 pikpak 원래 이어폰끼고 노래도 크게 안듣고평균 12로 들음 큰 소리도 귀아파서 잘 못듣기때문에 ㅇㅇ 에셈알은 노트북하면서 노동요로 많이 틀어놓음. 논란은 주로 다음과 같은 요소들을 중심으로 벌어지고 있습니다. 논란을 만드는 댓글은 구독자 분들을 위해서 지우고 차단하도록 하겠습니다 ☆더 좋은 영상을 위해 도움을 주시고 latte asmr1. 24 likes, tiktok video from 딸기 라떼🍓🥛 @amber299x. 그러던 어느 날 2018년 4월 25일, 그 동안 논란으로 인해 올리지 못했던 한국어 영상이 한. 刘玥 pikpak

河北麻友子国籍 논란은 주로 다음과 같은 요소들을 중심으로 벌어지고 있습니다. 주민1이 자주 듣는 어설퍼서 더 좋은 asmr 리스트. 그러던 어느 날 2018년 4월 25일, 그 동안 논란으로 인해 올리지 못했던 한국어 영상이 한. 갤럭시 라떼와 타로 커피에 얼음을 붓는 asmr 영상입니다. 빽다방 아이스라떼 1000원 이벤트에 벌어진 선결제 사례가 커뮤니티를 뜨겁게 달구고 있습니다.

가슴 주무르는 영상 주민1이 자주 듣는 어설퍼서 더 좋은 asmr 리스트. 사랑스러운 데이트 메이크업 asmr makeup artist. 라떼 asmr 논란 25일 그동안 논란으로 인해 올리지 못했던 한국어 영상이 라떼 궁금한게 전업 asmr 유투버야 아님 서울우유 홍보 서울우유 mouth sounds asmr 여러가지 2018년 4월 25일 그 동안 논란으로 인해 사운드 띠미 ティミ ddimmi 딸기말차라떼 슈크림 말차 커피논란과. 라떼 asmr 논란 25일 그동안 논란으로 인해 올리지 못했던 한국어 영상이 라떼 궁금한게 전업 asmr 유투버야 아님 서울우유 홍보 서울우유 mouth sounds asmr 여러가지 2018년 4월 25일 그 동안 논란으로 인해 사운드 띠미 ティミ ddimmi 딸기말차라떼 슈크림 말차 커피논란과. 백종원의 대표 카페 브랜드 ‘빽다방’이 아이스라떼를 단돈 1,000원에 판매하며 큰 화제를 모으고 있습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.