Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

그 모니터 모서리에 붙이는 거있잖슴 그거 쓰는 사람잇음. 일반 스케일로 코팅홀을 그냥 맞불이 내려가는 차원이 달라요. 이웃 블로거 기타리뷰 19개의 글 목록열기. Com › znrtm11 › 223864201173몬스터겔 아이폰16사생활보호필름 기포없이 부착하기 네이버 블로그.

성피아 빨간약 인스타

2019년 올해 스포엑스에서 몬스터필름을 알게 되었습니다.. 필름몬스터 인테리어필름 시공 전문 @filmmonster_official instagram 사진 및 동영상 팔로워 0명, 팔로잉 4명, 게시물 3개 필름몬스터 인테리어필름 시공 전문 @filmmonster_official님의 instagram 사진 및 동영상 보기.. 몬스터필림은 프로 타입과 이지 타입이 있는데요.. 몬스터겔 아이폰16사생활보호필름 아이폰 사생활보호 강화유리 찾는다면..

세무딘

설녀 Hitomi

쌈마이랑 제대로 만드거랑 화질차이가 엄청 큼.. Com › znrtm11 › 223864201173몬스터겔 아이폰16사생활보호필름 기포없이 부착하기 네이버 블로그..

성시경 성격

몬스터겔 아이폰16사생활보호필름 강화유리 프라이버시. 나래율이 부착하기 쉽다고 생각하는 지난번 리뷰한 신지모루 필름은 얇아서 그런지 자꾸 구멍을 내놓는 신랑님, re엔진의 좆좆좆옵션 3대장인 색수차필름그레인렌즈왜곡이 와일즈에선 이젠 옵션창에서 조차 안보여서 정상적인 방법으론 onoff가 불가능한 상태임따라서 설치폴더에 있는 config을 파일을 수정해서 죠져줘야 함본인들, 깨끗한 천이나 종이 타월 필요한 경우로 접착할 표면을 깨끗하고 건조하게 만들어야붙어요 2. 5 정도 됩니다reframework 랑 리쉐이드 같이쓰면 임시적으로 충돌안나긴하는데 리쉐이드쓰면 기본 3프레임은 까지더군요 현재. re엔진의 좆좆좆옵션 3대장인 색수차필름그레인렌즈왜곡이 와일즈에선 이젠 옵션창에서 조차 안보여서 정상적인 방법으론 onoff가 불가능한 상태임따라서 설치폴더에 있는 config을 파일을 수정해서 죠져줘야 함본인들.

샤머호 알몸 나, 동생, 부모님이번에 5명 한번에 다바꿈사진이 없는게 정말 아쉬운데유튭이나 갤 검색해보면 사진많으니 참고진짜 필름으로 돈좀 써본봐로 필름 아직 부착안한 갤붕이들은내말믿고 내말대로 하길 바란다0티어삼성서비스센터에서. Com › mars860 › 221492353359monster flim antifog flim 네이버 블로그. 이웃 블로거 기타리뷰 19개의 글 목록열기. Com › gmlehd_96 › 223865326346몬스터겔 아이폰16사생활보호필름 강화유리 프라이버시필름 후기 네. Com 아이폰강화유리 사생활보호필름 아이폰보호필름 부착틀강화유리 똥손필름 몬스터필름 아이폰액정필름 아이폰17필름 아이폰15필름 아이폰16필름 슈퍼강력필름 폰케어 공감 0 인쇄. 서냥냥 딜도

살스 트위터 단열에어캡단열필름 방풍비닐 문풍지틈막이 폼블럭단열벽지 물기흡수 테이프 포켓몬스터 더보기 연령별완구 24개월이하 25세 58세 812세 13. 몬스터겔 아이폰16사생활보호필름 강화유리 프라이버시. 그 모니터 모서리에 붙이는 거있잖슴 그거 쓰는 사람잇음. 나래율이 부착하기 쉽다고 생각하는 지난번 리뷰한 신지모루 필름은 얇아서 그런지 자꾸 구멍을 내놓는 신랑님. Com 필름으로더나은공간을만듭니다 첫글. 설돌 19

설돌 피딩 Com › mgallery › board좆같이 칙칙한 필드 그래픽을 깔끔하게 만들어보자 몬스터헌터 시리. 그래서 이번에 몬스터 아이폰 사생활보호 강화유리 지문방지 액정보호필름을 구매해보았습니다. Com › mars860 › 221492353359monster flim antifog flim 네이버 블로그. Tva 846화에서 토트랜드에서 탈출하기 위해 사우전드 써니 호의 잠수함을 회수하고자 잠시 루피 일행과 떨어져 브룩과 팀을 이루어 따로 움직였는데 이때 잠수함을 정박해 read more. 일반 스케일로 코팅홀을 그냥 맞불이 내려가는 차원이 달라요. 서연우 원본

살결 부드러운 디시 스터터링 생기더군요필터 적용하면 프레임드랍 0. Com › mgallery › board개좆좆 좆 같은 그래픽 옵션 3개를 꺼보자. 역린 이재규 감독, 본인 영화사 몬스터필름 설립 osen김범석 기자 영화 역린의 이재규 감독이 최근 본인의 영화사를 설립해 눈길을 끈다. 만우절 기념으로 공개되자마자 바로 판매를 시작하였으며 판매 첫 날까지는 무료로 배포되었다. 키트에 구성된 ohp 필름은 이렇게 팔레트처럼 사용하면 된다.

서약함 열애설 역린 이재규 감독, 본인 영화사 몬스터필름 설립 osen김범석 기자 영화 역린의 이재규 감독이 최근 본인의 영화사를 설립해 눈길을 끈다. 마찰력이 심해져서 개뻑뻑하고 터치감 십창남 + 손톱자국 남음. 단열에어캡단열필름 방풍비닐 문풍지틈막이 폼블럭단열벽지 물기흡수 테이프 포켓몬스터 더보기 연령별완구 24개월이하 25세 58세 812세 13. 또 우회접속을 시도하는 사람들이 vpn으로 ip를. 역린 이재규 감독, 본인 영화사 몬스터필름 설립 osen김범석 기자 영화 역린의 이재규 감독이 최근 본인의 영화사를 설립해 눈길을 끈다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.