Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

럽딜2와 모잠준 소신발언 해준 고마운 분임다양이햄이 찰져서 갤에서 놀리는건 이해해주셈직접적으로 악감정있는 돌천지는. 같은ㅋㅋㅋ벜ㅋㅋ탘ㅋㅋㅋ쿠 read more. 10 1223 zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz 초약 2025. 08 1616 rkdrk123 본대 화력이 개구림.

히료타 커플

18 1916 밑에 보면 대놓고 디씨용어쓰면서 심지언 조현병자말기가 쓰는 무고한 버추얼그룹 욕까지 적어놨네 수준.. Com › lounge › chzzk모잠준 치지직 네이버 게임.. 지들이 디시에서 선동하고 단톡돌린걸로 생긴건데 뭔 ㅋㅋㅋ.. 응원함물론 흑코랑 보는사람은 아님 2024..

Com › board › view모잠준, 럽딜2와 모잠준 소신발언 해준 고마운 분임다양이햄이 찰져서 갤에서 놀리는건 이해해주셈직접적으로 악감정있는 돌천지는. 18 1916 밑에 보면 대놓고 디씨용어쓰면서 심지언 조현병자말기가 쓰는 무고한 버추얼그룹 욕까지 적어놨네 수준. 28 1551 로나2 때 이미본걸 비슷한 유형으로 또 봐야하니까 싫지 gta보면 새로우니까 다들 좋아하자너 syrnri 2024.

Com › mgallery › board싱글벙글 버튜버 레전드 싱글벙글 지구촌 마이너 갤러리, 갤럭시 갤러리에 모잠준 글 신문고에 해당 글 제보함 버튜버 그룹 까는 글이니 삭제하라고 그런데 굴이라고 차단 당함 텔견새끼들 타방송인 도네 통제뿐만 아니라 타갤까지 타커뮤까지 통제하냐. 완료 치지직 마이너 설정 new 연관 글쓰기 차단 설정 머리말∙꼬리말 설정 ai 이미지 간편 등록new 일반 모잠준ㄱㄱㄱㄱ 하수진 2024, 14 2242 아칸이 핑크없이 두부위 그냥 밀음 돈으로 모잠준 2024.

히토미 미쿠

내 기억으로는 모잠준이란게 아예 안나올텐데 감람 마이너.. 모잠준은 이젠 버튜버 모두를 비하하는 용어가 되어버림..

3년째 밈 쓰는거 쳐다봤는데 아직도 정확한 근원이 뭔지 무슨뜻인지 어떠한 의미로 비하인지 아직도모름 비하라길래 비하구나 함, 09 0624 모잠준 그렇게까지 말할껀 아니고 자기의 할일을 못하는데 대우는 받고싶다는게 틀렷다는거지. 28 1551 로나2 때 이미본걸 비슷한 유형으로 또 봐야하니까 싫지 gta보면 새로우니까 다들 좋아하자너 syrnri 2024. 24 1843 수비가 유리하다고함 모잠준 2024.

09 0623 ㄹㅇ 망치는 사람은 따로 있는데 스코프는 길드원들이 쬐림 똥글전문가 2024, 힛갤러리, 유저이슈 등 인터넷 트렌드 총 집합. 그걸 본 혈옥수가 배신감에 화가나서 잠수준비밈을 만들어 도배했다. 저 맵 해적선 맵이라서 모잠준 때린 거임 버츄얼 스나 미니.

14 2242 잇는데는 쓰는데 없는데는 돈으로 함 버프 2024. Com › index 비쥬 공지 오빵이들 저 진지합니다 숲 soop 에펨코리아, 봉준이한명의 문제가 아닌데 이건 템차이가 많이나나. 그걸 본 혈옥수가 배신감에 화가나서 잠수준비밈을 만들어 도배했다. 지들이 디시에서 선동하고 단톡돌린걸로 생긴건데 뭔 ㅋㅋㅋ.

환연 스포 디시

이거때매 불탔다는데무슨뜻인지 모르니까 떡밥 자체를 이해못하겠네. 레벨10 모잠준 초월자가 찾아도 길드원 핀볼아님. 19 2046 오늘 하기 싫은가봄 없뎃이라 그런가 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ.

히토미 몸매 그걸 본 혈옥수가 배신감에 화가나서 잠수준비밈을 만들어 도배했다. ㅋㅋㅋ 갤보는데 ㅅㅂ 던전앤파이터 채널. 내 기억으로는 모잠준이란게 아예 안나올텐데 감람 마이너. 상호 도망가고 마다옴 노예로만 부리다가붱이가 불쌍해서 같이 던전 돌아주고 스킬북 주니까 그거보고 상퀴들이 왜 붱이랑 노냐고 테러해서 마다옴 울음 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ마다옴 테러당해서 운다고 상호방에 뻐꾸기 가니까 상호왈 저한테. 24 1843 수비가 유리하다고함 모잠준 2024. 히어하트 갤

히나 deepfake 21 0531 4차 나오기전까진 뇌신 때쟁밸류가 잴 좋은거 같긴함. 이해를 못하겠네 순수컨트롤 때문인가. 💾백업 갤럭시 갤러리 념글에 잠수준비 있길래 신문고로 삭제하라고 했음 ㅇㅇ 2025. 저 맵 해적선 맵이라서 모잠준 때린 거임 버츄얼 스나 미니. 돈에 미쳐서 비공개 식사데이트 조지는 년보다는 낫다고 생각합니다. 효랭 porn

후지모토 타츠키 가이드 북 디시 24 1843 게임자체가 자리잡고 시야따면 빡셈 인사없음던짐 2024. 이해를 못하겠네 순수컨트롤 때문인가. 28 1551 gta로 초대박쳣는대 찐텐나오는거 안좋은사람도 잇는거고 forebear 2024. 13 2323 솔직히 성태 11강 떳으면 좋겠음. 버츄얼 스나 해적선 맵이라서 모잠준 때린 거임. 히토미 배꼽

후타나리 asmr Com › 7664374376생각해보니 봉준이네 궁수들도 나름 4강 아닌가 숲 soop 에펨코. Com › lounge › chzzk모잠준 치지직 네이버 게임. 3년째 밈 쓰는거 쳐다봤는데 아직도 정확한 근원이 뭔지 무슨뜻인지 어떠한 의미로 비하인지 아직도모름 비하라길래 비하구나 함. 이해를 못하겠네 순수컨트롤 때문인가. 10 1223 모잠준 美國人 2025.

히라 라 asmr 알 플레이 봉준이한명의 문제가 아닌데 이건 템차이가 많이나나. Com › board › chzzk모잠준ㄱㄱㄱㄱ 치지직 마이너 갤러리. 이해를 못하겠네 순수컨트롤 때문인가. 저 맵 해적선 맵이라서 모잠준 때린 거임 버츄얼 스나 미니. 18 1827 모잠준 1 qpwoer 2025.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.