Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Nao masaki 마사키 나오 @masakikantoku. Setelah kau merayunya dengan ciuman manis yang meluluhkan hati, dia akan ketagihan. 真咲南朋 （1985年7月24日—）是 日本 av导演，前 av女优 3 。. 分类： 1985年出生 在世人物 神奈川县出身人物 桃太郎映像女优 moodyz女优 office ks女优 映天女优 sod女优 freedom女优 aknr女优 fa pro女优 大洋图书女优 dogma女优 audaz japan女优 art video女优 u&k女优 麒麟堂女优 中嶋兴业女优 gogos女优 aroma planning女优 hibino女优 attackers女优 maxing女优 alice japan女优 v&r女优 prestige.

真咲南朋とは、 このデータベースのデータおよび解説文等の権利はすべて株式会社スティングレイが所有しています。.. Seorang wanita cantik yang frustrasi secara seksual merayu para pemuda.. 真咲南朋（まさきなお，1985年7月24日），出生于日本神奈川县，日本女演员。 2009年8月7日，主演的电影《chikan onsen midarayunozoki tabi》上映。2010年3月6日，参演的电影《奴隶船》上映。2014年10月9日，参加的综艺节目《ダラケ.. 出演 禁断の華・恥じらい 緊縛された肉体美2010ov..

유디 정지

对女优来说，这是最好的结局吧？ 2018年12月1号出道、当时是因为想要摆脱失恋的忧伤所以成为女优的「岬あずさ岬梓」现在重回给她银幕初体验的片商moodyz发表告别作，三大监督「真咲南朋」、「tohjiro」以及「タイガー小堺. 又到了档期环节，今天也是sod star的2月新人彩月七緒提前配信的日子，算是正式亮相了，有一说一，彩月七緒的出道作要比她sns的自拍照好看得多，再一次感叹イージー松本的摄影技术，抓到的都是能凸显彩月, Jika aku menunjukkan padanya bagaimana aku bermain dengan pria lain, 気持ち良い種付けsex（12月14日、rookie vr） 真下からの神. 女性av監督の真咲南朋さん。 もともとはロリ系のav女優として数多くの作品に出演していましたが、今は作品を作る側に回っています。.

운파이 번호

Com › search › 真咲南朋+春原未来真咲南朋+春原未来 jav videos javher.. 真咲南朋事務所 @masakikantoku posts x.. Com › v142927921真咲南朋 搜狗百科..

위고비 마 운자 로 갈아 타기 디시

真咲南朋 名義 2017年 w復讐スイートルーム（8月1日、ドリームチケット） 2018年 世界で一番エロく見える君島みおの生々しいフェラチオと気持ち良すぎるsex vr（12月14日、 rookie vr） 世界で一番中出し精子を子宮で受け止める女の子の超, Hours ago actress misono waka genre pretty girl, big breasts, individual, swallow sperm, imprisonment, sweating, hd, exclusive maker attackers director 真咲南朋 label in mad asiagoodluck live. 真咲南朋事務所 @masakikantoku posts x, Setelah kau merayunya dengan ciuman manis yang meluluhkan hati, dia akan ketagihan. M男監禁パニックルーム 1 女たちが執拗に男を追い詰め続ける破壊と再生のガチンコドキュメント 友田彩也香×真咲南朋 この商品は18歳以上の方のみ購入できます。.

유우양 얼굴 디시

Jp › person › 1000087443真咲南朋のプロフィール・画像・写真 webザテレビジョン, 真咲南朋个人资料, 又名 masaki nao, 生日 19850724, 身高 161, 三围 856290 cm, 出生地 神奈川县, 对女优来说，这是最好的结局吧？ 2018年12月1号出道、当时是因为想要摆脱失恋的忧伤所以成为女优的「岬あずさ岬梓」现在重回给她银幕初体验的片商moodyz发表告别作，三大监督「真咲南朋」、「tohjiro」以及「タイガー小堺, Com › search › 真咲南朋+春原未来真咲南朋+春原未来 jav videos javher. 真咲南朋（外文名：nao masaki），1985年7月24日出生于日本神奈川县，日本av女优、av导演。曾用艺名包括まさきなお、安藤なつ妃、楓モモ。2010年出演电影《禁断の華恥じらい.

japanese av idol and director. One day, while having a tea party as usual, the topic turned to sex life. 对别人狠不叫狠，自己都打真狠人。 在一个叫作自然保护区的厂。 这个厂2010年8月成立，特色是大肚能容维基错误？ dmm上标的是学园舍，妄想厂旗下， 口号是以变态开始，以变态结束。 10月出演粉红电影（此后陆续10余本）。. The student she met through the app is obedient, and mary awakens to the pleasure of dominating. 出生於 神奈川縣。 她擔任av女優時的藝名是「安藤なつ妃」。她還以「楓モモ」的身份活躍。 擔任av女優時以 蘿莉身份 出道， 2009年 左右開始轉向少婦、 熟女，個人作品很少，也出現在 戀物 電影中。 最初，喜歡 奇聞趣事，想成為一名av導演。為了推銷自己的自慰視頻，她應聘了av製作公司的工作.

基础信息 本名 ：真咲南朋 别名 ：まさきなお、安藤なつ妃、楓モモ 外文名 ：nao masaki 出生日期 ：1985年7月24日 出生地 ：日本神奈川县 国籍 ：日本 职业 ：演员、导演 星座 ：狮子座 职业生涯与作品 演员生涯 真咲南朋于2008年以电影《母性愛の女 昼間からしたい, 女性av監督の真咲南朋さん。 もともとはロリ系のav女優として数多くの作品に出演していましたが、今は作品を作る側に回っています。, Yuuna met a young man through an app and seems to be having fulfilling sex with him, Masaki nao is a japanese adult video av star, director, and pink eiga film actress. Masaki nao is a japanese adult video av star, director, and pink eiga film actress, 出演 喪失（妹）告白 恥じらいの震え2010.

원진성형외과 디시 Jp › person › 1000087443真咲南朋のプロフィール・画像・写真 webザテレビジョン. One day, while having a tea party as usual, the topic turned to sex life. Seorang wanita cantik yang frustrasi secara seksual merayu para pemuda. 女性av監督の真咲南朋さん。 もともとはロリ系のav女優として数多くの作品に出演していましたが、今は作品を作る側に回っています。 まれに作品に友情出演することもありますが、現在は男性との絡みはないとい. 又到了档期环节，今天也是sod star的2月新人彩月七緒提前配信的日子，算是正式亮相了，有一说一，彩月七緒的出道作要比她sns的自拍照好看得多，再一次感叹イージー松本的摄影技术，抓到的都是能凸显彩月. 유봄냥 빨간약

윈터지아 과거 出演 喪失（妹）告白 恥じらいの震え2010. 出演 喪失（妹）告白 恥じらいの震え2010. She was born on july 24th, 1985 in kanagawa. 对女优来说，这是最好的结局吧？ 2018年12月1号出道、当时是因为想要摆脱失恋的忧伤所以成为女优的「岬あずさ岬梓」现在重回给她银幕初体验的片商moodyz发表告别作，三大监督「真咲南朋」、「tohjiro」以及「タイガー小堺. Achj078 yuki takeuchi, a beautifullegged woman who seduces a masochistic man with her overwhelming superiority, plays an extraordinary pantyhose fet. 운파이 nude

유영철 아들 디시 気持ち良い種付けsex（12月14日、rookie vr） 真下からの神. Hours ago actress misono waka genre pretty girl, big breasts, individual, swallow sperm, imprisonment, sweating, hd, exclusive maker attackers director 真咲南朋 label in mad asiagoodluck live. 2018年12月1号出道、当时是因为想要摆脱失恋的忧伤所以成为女优的「岬あずさ 岬梓」现在重回给她荧幕初体验的片商moodyz发表告别作，三大监督「真咲南朋」、「tohjiro」以及「タイガー小堺 老虎小堺」共同执导，阵容华丽到不行。. 女性av監督の真咲南朋さん。 もともとはロリ系のav女優として数多くの作品に出演していましたが、今は作品を作る側に回っています。 まれに作品に友情出演することもありますが、現在は男性との絡みはないとい. Achj078 yuki takeuchi, a beautifullegged woman who seduces a masochistic man with her overwhelming superiority, plays an extraordinary pantyhose fet. 유성+mac

유나 보지 真咲南朋とは、 このデータベースのデータおよび解説文等の権利はすべて株式会社スティングレイが所有しています。. 真咲 南朋（まさき なお、1985年7月24日 ）は、日本のav監督。元av女優。. Mary and yuuna are good friends who are moms. 女性av監督の真咲南朋さん。 もともとはロリ系のav女優として数多くの作品に出演していましたが、今は作品を作る側に回っています。. Jp › person › 1000087443真咲南朋のプロフィール・画像・写真 webザテレビジョン.

유디 엉덩이 Jp › person › 1000087443真咲南朋のプロフィール・画像・写真 webザテレビジョン. 真咲監督（まさきかんとく） @nannannantomo posts av監督17ライバー instagramvoicyfantia ＊ instagram. She was born on july 24th, 1985 in kanagawa. 真咲 南朋（まさき なお、1985年7月24日 ）は、日本のav監督。元av女優。. 真咲監督（まさきかんとく） @nannannantomo posts x.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.