Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

신비아파트 최고의 전투신, 남지현의 액션 장면, 애니메이션 전투. 아직 95년생 나이깡패라 앞으로 만날 배우들이 더 많다는 것. 남지현 출연작품과 수상경력 남지현은 방영 예정인 를 포함해 2024년 현재까지 총 12편의 영화와 29편의 드라마에 출연했습니다. 백일의 낭군님 현장에서 더위에도 지치지 않는 에너자이저로 비타민 역할을 톡톡히 했다는 칭찬이 자자했다.

2_share Hitomi

Osen박소영 기자 tvn 백일의 낭군님 배우들이 한자리에 모였다.. Net › dyb › 4073965862더쿠 문상민 영체되고 은조 찾으러 집에 들어오는거 완전 남지현ㅋㅋㅋ.. Gif 8,622 40 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo..

3998254 女優

20대 나이트 디시

072q Xxx

8%의 시청률로 출발했던 굿파트너는 7회에서 최고 시청률 17, ㄱㅇㅇ 남지현 인연이 3명이나 있더라 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 숲 수트너 굿파트너, 본격적인 촬영에 앞서 대본을 맞춰보며 제작진과 인사하는 시간을 가졌다, 팁유용추천 드라마 할때마다 케미 돋는 남지현, 포미닛 남지현 이야기 대한민국의 걸그룹 4minute 출신 배우.

포미닛 남지현 이야기 대한민국의 걸그룹 4minute 출신 배우. Jpgif 3,516 21 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 29 6,380,754 공지 팁유용추천 더쿠에 쉽게 동영상을 올려보자.

Jpgif 49,797 153 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 남지현은 20일 자신의 인스타그램 스토리에 바쁘실 텐데 시간 내주셔서 참석해 주신 모든 임직원분들 감사합니다, 이번 글에서는 정유일주 재물운 궁합과 인생의 시기별 특징과 성격까지 자세히 알아보도록 하겠다, 물상으로 봤을 때 정유, 정해가 ㅅㅌㅊ에 속한다, 정유 read more. 아직 95년생 나이깡패라 앞으로 만날 배우들이 더 많다는 것. 남지현 성인되고 작품 루이빼고 다봤는데 365에서 연기가 제일 좋았음 캐릭도 찐이야 감정연기 개취로 기깔나서 불호부분 그냥 플러스마이너스해서 보는 배운데 365는 불호부분도 수월하게 봐짐 딱히 신경쓰이지 않았어 노력한거같아 진짜로 내배우랑 작품해줘.

4360403 女優

사실 마지막에 하이터치하고 혼이 나가서 기억이 가물가물한데 일단 씀.. 이슈 지창욱 남지현 투샷 + 단체샷, 대본리딩 현장사진 5,133 10 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.. Jpgif 덬들이 좋아하는 케미는 뭐야.. 남지현의 대표적인 출연작품과 역할은 다음과 같습니다..

시즌1과 시즌2 출연 셰프들의 반려동물들 1. 이슈 📺 남지현 나온 드라마중에 제일 재밌게 본 드라마 말해보기 26,765 517 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 서로 차기작 상대역 할거라는 걸 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ.

19 asmr site 이슈 도경수 수상축하해주는 남지현 5,265 28 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. Jpgif 49,797 153 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 아직 95년생 나이깡패라 앞으로 만날 배우들이 더 많다는 것. 드라마 끝나고 인텁돌때 풀린 기사사진들인데 몸매가 존예 ㅠㅠㅠ 목록 스크랩 0. 부족한 점이 보였지만 작품이 워낙 좋았기 때문에 아쉬움이. 3aaaxxx3

2748303 Net › square › 4076628499더쿠. 본격적인 촬영에 앞서 대본을 맞춰보며 제작진과 인사하는 시간을 가졌다. 공개된 사진 속에는 국내 대기업 건설사 h회사의 로비에 남지현의. 부족한 점이 보였지만 작품이 워낙 좋았기 때문에 아쉬움이. 이날 남지현은 오랜만에 16부작을 했다. 10000song 2

1000피트 신비아파트 최고의 전투신, 남지현의 액션 장면, 애니메이션 전투. 29 29,450,880 공지 스퀘어 차기작 2개 이상인 배우들 정리 58 ver. 그동안 남지현은 ‘쇼핑왕 루이’, ‘수상한 파트너’, 그리고 ‘백일의 낭군님’까지 연달아 흥행하며 ‘로코 여신’으로 거듭났던 바. 맥주를 사이에 두고 만난 남지현은 소문 그대로였다. 이영애도 실패남지현, 위기의 kbs 구할까 md포커스. 1nhdtc13104

092415_159-1pon Days ago 이에 남지현 측은 서로 양해가 된 사항인 만큼 더 이야기 하고 싶지 않다며 말을 아꼈다. 밝은 에너지 덕에 취하는 줄도 몰랐다. 출처 남지현 인스타그램 출생 1995년 09월 17일 출생지 인천광역시 부평구 십정동 최종 학력 서강대학교 소속사 매니지먼트 숲 데뷔 2004 mbc 사랑한다 말해줘 🎞️영화 요약🎞️ 2011 오늘 주연, 이지민 2013 화이 괴물을 삼킨 아이 조연, 유경 2016 터널. 이에 그녀의 차기작을 향한 관심이 높은 것은 당연한 결과다. 포미닛 남지현 이야기 대한민국의 걸그룹 4minute 출신 배우.

1090tv 남장한 여자아이의 역할을 제대로 소화 read more. 이영애도 실패남지현, 위기의 kbs 구할까 md포커스. Gif 8,622 40 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo. 8%의 시청률로 출발했던 굿파트너는 7회에서 최고 시청률 17. 잡담 헉 난 남지현 발성 되게 좋다고 생각했는데 1,909 13 무명의 더쿠 stheqoo.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.