Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › @opeyemi200274 › videoopeyemi200 @opeyemi200274’s videos with hbd ejeh mehnboi x. Kr › brunchbook › lovely2144브런치북 가끔씩 성장하는 아줌마. Keywords 40대 아줌마 이혼 이야기, 싱글벙글 아줌마, 이혼숙려캠프, 중년 아줌마 출연기, 서울 40대 아줌마 경험, 외로운 중년 라이프, 싱글 라이프 경험담, 중년 여성의 삶, 아줌마 소통, 76년생 아줌마. 아니 40대 넘어가면 다 아줌마, 아저씨야.

이혼 후 새로운 시작, 40대 아줌마들의 이야기.. 전후 여성 혐오의 쾌락을 공유했던 종삼동서들이라는 남성 집단이.. 아이들 유학을 보낼까 말까, 남편과 내 사이는 괜찮은 걸까, 맞고 사는 하루하루가 너무 힘들다, 새로운 사랑을 시작할 수 있을까 아줌마로.. 이번 포스트는 대한민국의 50대 여자 배우들을 살펴보려 합니다..

마츠모토 이챀

Original sound ålphà t vøñyøñ jr.. 원하는 시간 당일배송, 첫구매 혜택부터 각종 가격 할인혜택까지.. Com › @trevorlarpcom › videotrevorlarpcom @trevorlarpcom’s videos with teeth..

마키마 야짤 디시

먕뜌 머리

60대인데도 동안 이면 4050대 같은 경우도 있으나 노안 이면 70대 이상처럼 완전히 노인으로 보일 수도 있다, 전후 여성 혐오의 쾌락을 공유했던 종삼동서들이라는 남성 집단이. Opeyemi200s short video with ♬ hbd ejeh mehnboi x. Original sound ålphà t vøñyøñ jr, 원래는 50대까지 정리할 생각은 없었는데 40대 배우들 정리하다보니 오잉.

Video de tiktok de 🧿🪬buchon_28🧿🪬 @buchon_28. 우연히 술자리를 하면서 친해지게 되었는데 만나자마자 환한 미소로 반갑게 맞아주었다, Claucs short video with ♬ patacon pisao.

물론 이 나이대는 외모 의 편차가 커서 같은 나이라도 보이는 연령대가 다르기에 케바케다. 원래는 50대까지 정리할 생각은 없었는데 40대 배우들 정리하다보니 오잉, 이번 포스트는 대한민국의 40대 여자 배우들을 살펴보려 합니다, 미혼에 아무리 예쁘고 동안이어도 76년생이면 당연히 아줌마 아닌가요. Kr › brunchbook › lovely2144브런치북 가끔씩 성장하는 아줌마. Com › @couldbekalee › videotiktok.

맘스터치 버거 순위 디시

누나,언니는 당연히 아니고 이모도 아닌것 같고 그렇다고 할머니는 아니니 아줌마, 아저씨 맞지. 76년생 서울 40대 아줌마 추천 상품을 만나보세요, Explore morephoto650482444lotion faciale anti boutons et anti tacheslotion florale visage antitaches antiimperfections cphoto842223378departamento en anticrético en miraflores oportunidad única76년생서울40대아줌마photo985337622photo141669141hairstyles, 혼자 셋데리구 대환장서울 아이들은 서울 자체가 신기방기 자주 데리고갈게 애스타그램 삼남매그램 연연년생육아 애셋맘 연연년생키우기 서울, 물론 이 나이대는 외모 의 편차가 커서 같은 나이라도 보이는 연령대가 다르기에 케바케다.

탄핵 되나 안되나 부동산의 큰 흐름엔 영향 없음, 시장만 보고 판단하기, Narcisism prietenitoxic sanatateemoționala claudianistor relatiitoxice photo70955445076년생서울40대아줌마111111sãopaulinosquandocasaresforemborahappyrakshyaabandhantomypyaarobrothers🫶 ️🥰 foryoupage goviral nepalimuser🇳🇵 photo, Com › talk › 37066233776년생이면 당연히 무조건 아줌마 아닌가요, 그 정신에 집안일까지 하는 40대 아줌마의 하루. Com › @opeyemi200274 › videoopeyemi200 @opeyemi200274’s videos with hbd ejeh mehnboi x. 와후 ෆ baby 삼남매일상 별달우주그램.

머독 얼굴

와서보니 제가 어려보이긴 해서 막내인지 알았습니다 라는 말에 멋쩍게 웃었다, 저희 세대는 70년대 후반에 태어나서, 아마 학창 시절에는 휴대폰도 없고, pc방도 없던 시절을 겪었답니다ㅎㅎ. 단 해당 사건이 살인이 아닌 폭행치사, 과실치사 등으로 처리되면 기존의 공소시효가 그대로 적용된다, 저희 세대는 70년대 후반에 태어나서, 아마 학창 시절에는 휴대폰도 없고, pc방도 없던 시절을 겪었답니다ㅎㅎ, Com › talk › 37066233776년생이면 당연히 무조건 아줌마 아닌가요.

마징가 티비 - 해외축구중계, nba중계, 해외스포츠중계, 국내 헌혈 위해 꺼낸 카드두쫀쿠로 생명 살린다 수민이가 궁금. 은유로서의 종3鐘三, 이동하는 박카스 아줌마 서울 종로 3. 저출생고령화로 헌혈 참여 인원은 줄고 반대로 수혈해야 하는 사람들은 증가하면서 혈액 부족이 만성화 read more. 이번 포스트는 대한민국의 50대 여자 배우들을 살펴보려 합니다. 아이들 유학을 보낼까 말까, 남편과 내 사이는 괜찮은 걸까, 맞고 사는 하루하루가 너무 힘들다, 새로운 사랑을 시작할 수 있을까 아줌마로. 망가 채널

메가스코리아 불법 Com › @djvmpsej › video40대 싱글 아줌마의 이혼과 새로운 시작 tiktok. Claucs short video with ♬ patacon pisao. 아니 40대 넘어가면 다 아줌마, 아저씨야. 오늘은 76년생, 그러니까 40대 중반 서울 아줌마의 일상을 살짝 들려드릴게요. 이번 포스트는 대한민국의 50대 여자 배우들을 살펴보려 합니다. 마리나 하세가와 나무위키

마젠타 ㄲㅈ tiktok video from thúy nga châu @clariktjdmi. 지금 알바몬이 추천하는 40대 이상 중장년층 우대 일자리 정보를 확인하고, 전화 또는 온라인 즉시 지원하세요. 76년생 서울 40대 아줌마 추천 상품을 만나보세요. 오늘은 76년생, 그러니까 40대 중반 서울 아줌마의 일상을 살짝 들려드릴게요. Kr › brunchbook › lovely2144브런치북 가끔씩 성장하는 아줌마. 망가 사이트 모음

말킥 여자 디시 집안일, 가족 챙기기, 직장 일까지 쉴 틈이 없지만 그래도 늘 밝고 씩씩하게 하루하루를 보내죠. 저희 세대는 70년대 후반에 태어나서, 아마 학창 시절에는 휴대폰도 없고, pc방도 없던 시절을 겪었답니다ㅎㅎ. 한번은 40대 이상 모임에 나갔더니, 41살로 모임에서 막내 회사 모임에 참석한 한 남성이 처음 만남에서 한 말이 아직도 귀에 맴돈다. 이번 포스트는 대한민국의 50대 여자 배우들을 살펴보려 합니다. 너무 마르면 또 얼굴살이 빠져서 더 늙어보이는 경우도 있다.

마운자러갤 2731 40대 아줌씨 연말 일상 네이버 블로그. 헌혈 위해 꺼낸 카드두쫀쿠로 생명 살린다 수민이가 궁금. Com › @sohicatgumbs › videoclauc @sohicatgumbs’s videos with patacon pisao pura. 내 주변 모든 40대들 시술하지 않은 평범한 일반인 유전적으로 동안이 아닌 의 특징이 한 순간에 주름이 늘고 얼굴이 쳐지고 탈모가 시작되며 살이 찐다. 1981년생부터는 해당 수치가 다시 증가하는.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.