Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › ydbkbolg › 223936940186도화살이란 무엇인가요. 애초에 사주대로 생기게 되어있는데 둘다 뭔 소리지 예를들어 사주에 도화가 강하면 외모도 적어도 매력있게생기거나 호감형이거나 뭔가 시선가게 생김 예뻐서 배우 아이돌같은 개성있어서 개그맨같든 시선받는 외모나 매력을 지니게됨 2021. 애초에 사주대로 생기게 되어있는데 둘다 뭔 소리지 예를들어 사주에 도화가 강하면 외모도 적어도 매력있게생기거나 호감형이거나 뭔가 시선가게 생김 예뻐서 배우 아이돌같은 개성있어서 개그맨같든 시선받는 외모나 매력을 지니게됨 2021. 도화살 시선받는게 정말 설명불가사의하게 보지않나 역학.

Korean Fakenude

Kor_cat_

애초에 사주대로 생기게 되어있는데 둘다 뭔 소리지 예를들어 사주에 도화가 강하면 외모도 적어도 매력있게생기거나 호감형이거나 뭔가 시선가게 생김 예뻐서 배우 아이돌같은 개성있어서 개그맨같든 시선받는 외모나 매력을 지니게됨 2021. 먼저 도화살 도화살은 다들 알다시피 엄청 순수함 몸에서 그냥 섹기가 막 흐름 그래서 주변보면 딱히 외모가 이쁜것도 아니고 마르고 몸매가 좋은것도. 하고 쳐다보는데 직접안보면모름 그걸 중학교 친구한테서느꼈는데 친한건아니고 같은반 옆짝에 급식소에서 같이 밥먹고 학교 read more. 도화살 뜻을 현실에 적용해보면 이런 사람들은 타고난 끌림의 에너지를 지닌 경우가 많은데요. 만약 그 방송에 나온 여자들이 미인이었다면, 오히려 사람들은 저건 그냥 이뻐서 그런거 아니냐.

Kuzu 보는 곳

Com › board › view도화살에 관한 중요한 것들.. 존재감이 너무 강력비유컨대선거유세할때 남들 1번간게나는 4번가는 꼴됨ㅎ 강력히.. 도화살있는 사람들은 존나 친절해서 탈임 친절하니까 사람들이 그걸당연시여기고 그걸권리로보고 이것도해달라 저것도해달라 존나게 요구하다가.. 50대 남성 사망 경주시, 추석맞이 농특산물 온오프 특별 할인전..

Korean Gaysex

도화는 외모랑 전혀 상관없더라 역갤러211, 그래서 도화살은 시선을 끈다, 현혹한다, 꾸미다, 위장한다 등의 뜻을 대입하면된다, 도화살있는 사람들은 존나 친절해서 탈임 친절하니까 사람들이 그걸당연시여기고 그걸권리로보고 이것도해달라 저것도해달라 존나게 요구하다가, 도화살은 타인의 시선 의식해서 행동하고 남들의 반응을 궁금해한다면 홍염살은 오로지 여자 꼬시는거에 몰두함.

kuzu 每日大赛 색기와 매력을 몽땅 그놈의 도화살로 퉁친다면 할말없는데 그럴거면 화개살이란것도 있는거지 2016. 하고 쳐다보는데 직접안보면모름 그걸 중학교 친구한테서느꼈는데 친한건아니고 같은반 옆짝에 급식소에서 같이 밥먹고 학교 read more. 도화살 뜻을 현실에 적용해보면 이런 사람들은 타고난 끌림의 에너지를 지닌 경우가 많은데요. 예쁜놈들 사이에서 시선끄니까 유독 예뻐보이거나 그런건 없는듯 그냥 더 예쁜놈이 인기가 많아 요약하자면 도화살 4개있는 삶을 살면서 느낀건 도화살은 내가 원하던 인기랑 별로 관련없었고 진짜 남녀노소 인기있는놈들은. 도화살없으면 색치가 흐릿하고 연함 이게 도화살이없어서 그렇다기보단 도화살잇는사람이 사기적으로 색체가 좀더 찌인함 ㄹㅇ 핑크여도 굉장히 밝고 찐하고 오묘해보이고 이쁜핑크가잏고 걍 그리다 만 핑크가잇고 이게 도화의차이임 니네가 백날 도화. kuzu 일본

korean gay cam twitter 디시인사이드의 게시판에서 다양한 주제에 대한 토론과 정보를 공유하세요. 도화살없으면 색치가 흐릿하고 연함 이게 도화살이없어서 그렇다기보단 도화살잇는사람이 사기적으로 색체가 좀더 찌인함 ㄹㅇ 핑크여도 굉장히 밝고 찐하고 오묘해보이고 이쁜핑크가잏고 걍 그리다 만 핑크가잇고 이게 도화의차이임 니네가 백날 도화. 예쁜놈들 사이에서 시선끄니까 유독 예뻐보이거나 그런건 없는듯 그냥 더 예쁜놈이 인기가 많아 요약하자면 도화살 4개있는 삶을 살면서 느낀건 도화살은 내가 원하던 인기랑 별로 관련없었고 진짜 남녀노소 인기있는놈들은. 시지 도화살 시지에 위치한 도화살은 개인의 사생활과 관련된 매력을 나타냅니다. 눈꼬리가 쳐졌다 가끔 눈꼬리 올라간게 도화안. korean ipcam kissjav

kuzu anal Com › board › view도화살의 본질. 도화살의 종류와 대운 등, 그리고 본인의 사주팔자에 따라 제각각이다. 234 도화살 없는년들 몰려와서 부들거릴 댓글창 2024. 그러므로 도화살 여부만으로 단식질하여 도화살을 무조건 깎아내리거나, 올려치기하고 신격화하는 것은 잘못된 인식이다. 존재감이 너무 강력비유컨대선거유세할때 남들 1번간게나는 4번가는 꼴됨ㅎ 강력히. l34k tumblr

kuzu only Com › ydbkbolg › 223936940186도화살이란 무엇인가요. 펌 200606202109 역학 갤러리. 도화살이 시선을 끄는 이유는 사실 도화살 소유자 자신이 남들에게 관심이 많기 때문입니다. 도화살있는 사람들은 존나 친절해서 탈임 친절하니까 사람들이 그걸당연시여기고 그걸권리로보고 이것도해달라 저것도해달라 존나게 요구하다가. 특히 도화살 관련 방송에 나온 여자들을 많이 운운하곤 하는데.

korea scat thisvid 항상 시선 집중될 일이 생기고 그래서 일로 풀어먹고 살라고 하는 듯 도화살도 살이야 죽일 살좋은 게 아님. 만약 그 방송에 나온 여자들이 미인이었다면, 오히려 사람들은 저건 그냥 이뻐서 그런거 아니냐. 도화살 있으면 사람 심쿵하게 하는 요소가 있음 ㅇㅇ223. 사주와 운이 적당하고 강하지 않은 도화살은 괜찮습니다. 도화는 외모랑 전혀 상관없더라 역학 갤러리.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.