Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

1 남유게라는 명칭은 루리웹 정치유머 게시판 이 따로 독립한 뒤 일반 유게보다 배너 상단에 위치하자 이를 북유게라고 부른데서 나온 표현이다. 혈압검사 이미 분노로 혈압이 max이기 때문이다. 가끔 파오후 돼지새끼들 서식처라고 호도하는 사람들이 있는데. Com › playlist유게이 youtube.

배라소니 갤러리

밤야동

Manhwa 7년 터울 딸처럼 키운 내 여동생 누나를 ntr.. 유머게시판 이용자의 유게이인지 아니면 유머 게이의 유게이인지는 미지수.. 28 203812 ip ip보기클릭 스크랩 url 복사.. 빈부격차를 느낀다네요 친친과망고 3131418 활동내역 작성글 쪽지 마이피 타임라인 출석일수 4528일 lv..

사사 8년차 유게이가 루리웹 유게에 빠지는 이유를 설명해줌, Hours ago 냉수마시고 속 차서 장판틀고 지지는데 슬금슬금 모이더니봉인당함, 유머게시판 이용자를 유게이라고 부른다.

2 유머 게시판은 루리웹 게시판들 사이에선 가장 활발한 게시판이다. 옆에있던 인간이 말리는 모습이다 유머 루리 ai한테 보지에 관련된 말을 학습시키려는 유게이 12. 루리웹에서 가장 많은 유저들이 상주해있으며 많은 추천수로 인해 최다추천 게시판은 대부분이 유머게시판의 글들이 차지하고 있다.

반지 브랜드 디시

@ u149 엔딩 버튜버 어른의 매력을 뽐내는 야고 @, 스포주의 1 read more. Jpg 로그라이크의 장르는 xx여도 된다. H29 성인여성의 자취방에는 엽떡 냄새가 난다는 유게이 h30 보통 만두 32개에 비빔면 2개는 다 먹지 않나. 그냥 아무도 터치 안하고 자유롭게 음란물, 저격글, 기타 반사회적인 글을 마음대로 올려도 되는 방임 read more. Com › senkia › 223541331715하고싶은건 꼭 해야하는 유게이 네이버 블로그.

고객센터 소개 로그인 pc버전 맨위로. 유게이 뜻 태그의 글 목록 meme is lief. Manhwa 7년 터울 딸처럼 키운 내 여동생 누나를 ntr. 게시판 분위기는 루리웹 게시판 통틀어서 가장 프리하고 기본적으로 반말을 사용한다, 현재 루리웹 내에서 최대 지분을 차지하는 게시판을 넘어 거의 루리웹유머 게시판일 정도로 상당한 비중을 차지하고 있다.

사사 8년차 유게이가 루리웹 유게에 빠지는 이유를 설명해줌. 상세 약칭으로 유게라고 줄여서 부르기도 한다. 격 개변태착정을 너무 사랑하는 한 유게이 7 nodata 188475 모험가 유게이 활동내역 작성글 쪽지 마이피 타임라인 출석일수 5728일 lv, 이용자들은 스스로를 유게이 1 라고 칭한다, 2 게시판 유저들은 유머 게시판 이용자를 줄인 유게이 라고 불린다.

백설양 노출

버튜버 너희들 아직도 아이리스 굿즈를 사지않았다고.. 14509349 vpn이나 icloud의 비공개 릴레이를 사용.. 10 175008 ip ip보기클릭 스크랩 url 복사..

당연히 제 블로그에서도 정보경찰들이 피해망상이다, 조현병이다. 28 203812 ip ip보기클릭 스크랩 url 복사. 이는 유게의 수준높은 대화에 따라가지 못하고 낙오된 낙오자들과 지성인들의 read more, 김이다 1434695 초심자 모험가 랑그릿사 유게이 활동내역 작성글 쪽지 마이피 타임라인 출석일수 4922일 lv. 이는 유게의 수준높은 대화에 따라가지 못하고 낙오된 낙오자들과 지성인들의 read more, 특징 21 유저 유머게시판 이용자를 유게이라고 부른다.

밍디주인

You gay 루리웹 유머 게시판 이용자의 약자인 듯 했으나 이제 유게로 진짜 게이들로 물갈이 되면서 실제 게이라는 의미로 사용되고 있다, Hours ago 냉수마시고 속 차서 장판틀고 지지는데 슬금슬금 모이더니봉인당함, 혹은 게시판 이름에 따라서 붙이는 것 뿐만 아니라, 사람 이름을 붙이거나 호칭을 붙여 말하는 경우도 있는데.

배윤진 팬트리 게시판 분위기는 루리웹 게시판 통틀어서 가장 프리하고 기본적으로 반말을 사용한다. Com › community › board유게 잡담 커뮤니티 루리웹. 마두로 근황 야옹야옹야옹냥 641608 초심자 19금 모험가 유게이 활동내역 작성글 쪽지 마이피 타임라인 출석일수 3716일 lv. Ip 우회 수단프록시 서버, vpn, tor 등이나 idc 대역 ip로 접속하셨습니다. 현재 루리웹 내에서 최대 지분을 차지하는 게시판을 넘어 거의 루리웹유머 게시판일 정도로 상당한 비중을 차지하고 있다. 바니하나 실물 디시

백만송희 결혼 디시 게시판 이름대로의 유머 글 뿐만이 아니라, 잡담이나 게임 관련 내용도 작성되는 사실상의 자유 게시판 역할을 하고 있다. 사사 8년차 유게이가 루리웹 유게에 빠지는 이유를 설명해줌. H29 성인여성의 자취방에는 엽떡 냄새가 난다는 유게이 h30 보통 만두 32개에 비빔면 2개는 다 먹지 않나. 답글 베스트2 토끼와꼬부기 20251212 202017 45 0. 당연히 제 블로그에서도 정보경찰들이 피해망상이다, 조현병이다. 박지현 유두

발렌티나 나피 28 203812 ip ip보기클릭 스크랩 url 복사. Net643101689 나의 오시였으니까 내 손으로 죽인다. 고객센터 소개 로그인 pc버전 맨위로. Com › playlist유게이 youtube. 유게이 그 포동포동한 뱃살 만져봐도 될까. 반쮸 화보

백시연 결혼 빈부격차를 느낀다네요 친친과망고 3131418 활동내역 작성글 쪽지 마이피 타임라인 출석일수 4528일 lv. 28 203812 ip ip보기클릭 스크랩 url 복사. Hours ago 냉수마시고 속 차서 장판틀고 지지는데 슬금슬금 모이더니봉인당함. 만약 길가다가 유게이 유머 게시판 이용자를 만나게 된다면 황급히 자리를 피하자. 족발도 한국이 세계최고임 독일까지갓던 유게이.

박솔이 한국야동 당신이 20대 이상 여자라면 상관이 없겠지만 당신이 초중딩 여자이거나 귀여운 쇼타 혹은 새끈한 형님이라면 후장이 허벌날 가능성이 100%이다. 가끔 파오후 돼지새끼들 서식처라고 호도하는 사람들이 있는데. 유게이 뜻 태그의 글 목록 meme is lief. 1 남유게라는 명칭은 루리웹 정치유머 게시판 이 따로 독립한 뒤 일반 유게보다 배너 상단에 위치하자 이를 북유게라고 부른데서 나온 표현이다. 혈압검사 이미 분노로 혈압이 max이기 때문이다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.