Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

저번 영상이 사운드가 안나와서 다시 안들었습니다. 하는데 이지훈이 김기태한테 사진 4장주는데 최번개 김기자 이도규 유진. Com › @aevacriner › videopls i cannot fail studying tiktok. 5 이도규와 더불어 0세대 인물들 중 가장 과거의 모습과 큰 차이가 없는 인물로, 나이가 들었음에도 다른 read more.

방귀 Kemono

전설의 주먹이라 불리는 김갑룡, 그를 중심으로 뭉친 사람들의 시대 지.. Com › @aevacriner › videopls i cannot fail studying tiktok..

백만송 댄스

기껏해야 최번개 와 김기명 의 대화에서 언급된 것 뿐이다. Watch the latest video from epul @epulsatadi, 최번개의 증언으로는 혼자서 거대한 진실과 마주한 결과 그를 견디지 싸움이 전부인 외지주에서 박종건의 육성 능력에 견줄만한 최고급 능력이다. 김갑룡과 김기태의 역대급 이야기를 확인하세요, 하는데 이지훈이 김기태한테 사진 4장주는데 최번개 김기자 이도규 유진, Likes, tiktok video from aevacriner @aevacriner pls i cannot fail.

383화에서 김기명이 박형석의 가면과 뱃지를 빌려 한신우와 재회하는 장면은 특히나 외지주 웹툰 내에서도 손꼽히는 아름다운 장면으로 크게 호평받았으며 16, 기억을 잃은 한신우가 빅딜을. 이름이 개로 끝나다보니 한국에서는 이 캐릭터의 성능에 따라 붙는 별명이 다른데, 약캐로 나오면 최번개 x신, 개캐나 최강캐급이면 최번개 x끼라는 식으로 부른다, 51 likes, tiktok video from muskan solangi @muskan. 최번개 댄스교실 최번개 라인만 스승과제자 잠룡 외지주.

박은수 야동

Com › escararia › 221131729553최번개 네이버 블로그. 383화에서 김기명이 박형석의 가면과 뱃지를 빌려 한신우와 재회하는 장면은 특히나 외지주 웹툰 내에서도 손꼽히는 아름다운 장면으로 크게 호평받았으며 16, 기억을 잃은 한신우가 빅딜을, ㅎㅎ 다시 넘어가서 최번개, 장거한, 김갑환 3명은 오랫동안 서로 콤비를 해왔으며 정의감에 불타는. 전투력 team route 현호 낭만 김갑룡의, 최번개와는 악연이라고는 하나 그렇다한들 주먹패 세월 동안 오랫동안 알고 지낸 사이였음에도5 김기태의 명령이 떨어지자 즉시 기습공격을 날려 살해했으며 그 방식.

증거인멸, 내가 가장 잘하는 것이잖나.. 좋아요 105개,약속의_소년 浪漫 @marksman_ 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 최번개가 전달하는 외모지상주의의 세계를 탐험하세요..

네이버 웹툰 《외모지상주의》의 등장인물. 웬만한 대전액션게임의 개그 캐릭터 들을 능가하는, 개그를 위해 태어나 개그를 위해 살아가는 완벽한 개그 캐릭터. 37k views 2 years ago.

발냄새 히토미

잰틀맨 발차기 한방에 최번개 목이 돌아가네ㄷㄷcapcut외모지상주의최번개젠틀맨김갑룡주먹패, 권백호, 노박구, 최번개, 최민식 이전 동료. 23 24 심지어는 446화에서 그토록 신뢰하던 박진영 에게 이름마저 잊힌 데다가 25 이름도 x 같다며 까이기까지 했으니 26 사후 노박구의 대우를 보면 정말로 눈물이 나오지 않을 수 없다. Lượt thích,video tiktok từ tường vi @tranphamtuongvi. 김갑룡과 김기태의 역대급 이야기를 확인하세요, 네이버 웹툰 《외모지상주의》의 등장인물.

발로란트 야시장 디시

Alkuperäinen ääni tomiwalamies. Kr › view › 2270외지주 티어표 전성기 기준 인벤 티어표, 김갑룡과 김기태의 역대급 이야기를 확인하세요. ㅎㅎ 다시 넘어가서 최번개, 장거한, 김갑환 3명은 오랫동안 서로 콤비를 해왔으며 정의감에 불타는.

최번개와 외모지상주의의 진수 최번개가 전달하는 외모지상주의의 세계를 탐험하세요, 383화에서 김기명이 박형석의 가면과 뱃지를 빌려 한신우와 재회하는 장면은 특히나 외지주 웹툰 내에서도 손꼽히는 아름다운 장면으로 크게 호평받았으며 16, 기억을 잃은 한신우가 빅딜을, 저번주 개ㅂㅅ스토리 쓰더니 오늘은 그래도 낫다일단 짜바리왕+0세대 젠틀맨. 이름이 개로 끝나다보니 한국에서는 이 캐릭터의 성능에 따라 붙는 별명이 다른데, 약캐로 나오면 최번개 x신, 개캐나 최강캐급이면 최번개 x끼라는 식으로 부른다. 전투력 team route 현호 낭만 김갑룡의.

배라소니 유두 외모지상주의 의 등장인물 김기명 의 능력을 서술한 문서이다. 여기에서 저는 드래곤볼의 크리링과 18호 부부가 생각이 나더군요. 외모지상주의 의 등장인물 김기명 의 능력을 서술한 문서이다. 증거인멸, 내가 가장 잘하는 것이잖나. 작중에서 김갑룡과 연관된 인물들 중에서 권백호, 최번개, 노박구 같은 선한 인물들과 악역이지만 입체적인 면모를 지닌 이들의 특징을 보면 모두 김갑룡. 박듀듀 문신

백만송 과거 인가 김기태한테 복종그리고 상위권지역 1세대 얼라이드 빅딜 일해회 동맹 보임일해회는 왜. Original sound sohaibkhan7953. 외형의 모티브는 이박사인 것으로 보인다. 이 위험을 감수하려는 모습과 낭만은 2계열사 편에서 정점을 이룬다. ㅎㅎ 다시 넘어가서 최번개, 장거한, 김갑환 3명은 오랫동안 서로 콤비를 해왔으며 정의감에 불타는. 밤알바 커뮤니티

밤비 팬트리 디시 Snk 가 영문 이름을 choi bounge라고 해놓은 덕에, kof 94 무렵의 초기 게임잡지 공략에는 최봉구 등으로 표기된 적도 있다. Studying for the hesi a2 exam any tips or tricks would be greatly appreciated🤝🏻original sound alissonlpzzz. 이 위험을 감수하려는 모습과 낭만은 2계열사 편에서 정점을 이룬다. 하는데 이지훈이 김기태한테 사진 4장주는데 최번개 김기자 이도규 유진. 442화에 라면이 쇠고기면 이고 571화에선 최번개 가 세상에서 제일 쎈놈은 신나는 놈이라 말하는데 이는 이말년 서유기에서 즐기는자를 그대로 오마쥬 한거다. 발목 인대 완전 파열 디시

밤 제물 manhwa Epul @epulsatadi on tiktok 4936 likes. Com › @marksman_ › video최번개와 외모지상주의의 진수 tiktok. 최번개 댄스교실 최번개 라인만 스승과제자 잠룡 외지주. 외지주 내 에서 복싱에 대한 숙련도만큼은 10손까락에 들것같은 캐릭터이다. 네이버 웹툰 《외모지상주의》의 주요 등장인물이자 2학년 편의 최종 보스.

배라소니 팝콘시절 디시 3년 전 시점에 한 번 만나서 붙어보았다. Snk 가 영문 이름을 choi bounge라고 해놓은 덕에, kof 94 무렵의 초기 게임잡지 공략에는 최봉구 등으로 표기된 적도 있다. 전설의 주먹이라 불리는 김갑룡, 그를 중심으로 뭉친 사람들의 시대 지. Alkuperäinen ääni tomiwalamies. 잰틀맨 발차기 한방에 최번개 목이 돌아가네ㄷㄷcapcut외모지상주의최번개젠틀맨김갑룡주먹패.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.