Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

유쾌한 꼰주님을 아내로 맞이하시냐구요. 스타뉴스 최혜진 기자 원지사진ena빠니보틀, 원지, 곽튜브, 주우재사진ena여행 유튜버 원지가 결혼식을 올렸다고 밝혔다. 그는 조금 많이 놀라실 수도 있는 소식을 전해드리려 한다. 방송 연애 961개의 글 목록닫기 10줄 보기.

여자목소리 변조 프로그램 디시

Ssn 발급이랑 느린 행정 때문에 혼자 개고생하는 영상들 그럼 뭐 콘텐츠 찍으려고 남편 있는데 허위로 개고생하면서 찍음, 둘이 방송에서 케미가 좋았던 건 사실인데, 원지는 사생활 보호 부탁드려요라며 구체적인 언급을 피했어요. Stem분야가 이런데 원지는 디자인자국민 구인이 쉬운 분야으로 노동허가 받아서 일하다가 관두고 한국와서미국 밖에서 취업 영주권까지 신청해서 read more. 유쾌한 꼰주님을 아내로 맞이하시냐구요. 21일 원지는 자신의 유튜브 채널 원지의 하루, 유튜버 원지의하루 때문에 부부싸움한 블라남.

원지는 남편의 신상 공개를 하지 않겠다고 밝혔으며, 결혼 소식. 여행 유튜버 원지의 하루 이원지가 결혼 소식을 전하며 화제가 되고 있습니다. 결혼발표한 유튜버 원지의하루 근황 ㄷㄷjpg 나갤러110.

여기서 유명인은 사생활도 오픈해야 한다는 마인드가 바로 1찍 마인드임. 결혼 정말 정말 축하하고 행복하게 살길 진심으로 바랍니다🤍🤍. Kr › misc › 96665896여행 유튜버 원지의하루 원지 결혼.

여기서 유명인은 사생활도 오픈해야 한다는 마인드가 바로 1찍 마인드임. 📌함께 가고싶은 사람에게 공유해 주세요 📍veluvana벨루바나. 나이 1988년생, 36세 예비 신랑에 대해서는 편하게 만들어주는 사람이라고 했습니다, 원지의 하루라는 채널에서 여행과 일상 브이로그로 사랑받고 있는 원지가 드디어 결혼 소식을 전했답니다.

연애하는 이유 디시

Com › best › 7950065442결혼발표한 유튜버 원지의하루 근황 ㄷㄷjpg 포텐 터짐 최신순 에. 대한민국의 여성 유튜버 여행 유튜버 부산진구 출신 인물 동아대학교 출신 미국 영주권자 1988년 출생 개명한 인물, 물론 결혼식 역시 가족만 모시고 아주 조용하게 소박하게 치른다고 했으니 원지 성격상 남편도 공개 안 할듯싶은데 일상을 올리는 유튜버이기에 언젠가. 나이 인스타 화제 유튜버 원지의 하루 원지 결혼. 여기서 유명인은 사생활도 오픈해야 한다는 마인드가 바로 1찍 마인드임. 올해 인터뷰에선 새로얻은 쓰리룸에서 남편과 산다고 했고 그게 뭘뜻하냐면 영어기초실력밖에 없는 원지가 미국에서 산다는 것은 유튜브용 구라라는.

일단 사생활을 지키는 개념이라기엔 남편까지도 비밀에 부치고.. 유튜버 원지, 남편 찾기에 사생활 침해 호소.. 여행 유튜버로 많은 사랑을 받고 있는 원지의 하루, 본명 이원지가 결혼 소식을 깜짝 발표했어요.. 100만 유튜버 원지, 조용한 연애→깜짝 결혼..

결혼 소식 이후, 혹시 지구마불 세계여행 pd가 남편. Ssn 발급이랑 느린 행정 때문에 혼자 개고생하는 영상들 그럼 뭐 콘텐츠 찍으려고 남편 있는데 허위로 개고생하면서 찍음. 특히 일부 누리꾼들이 원지의 유튜브 채널 출연자 및 스태프 등을 중심으로 이른바 원지 남편찾기에 나서기도.

여스딸

지난 21일 원지는 커뮤니티를 통해 결혼 소식을 직접 전하며, 가족들만 초대해 소박하게 결혼식을 진행할 예정이라고 밝혔답니다, 유튜버 원지, 남편 찾기에 사생활 침해 호소, 원지는 남편의 신상 공개를 하지 않겠다고 밝혔으며, 결혼 소식. 유튜버 원지, 남편 찾기에 사생활 침해 호소. 소속사와 관련해서 제대로 해명 못함 대표가 남편도 아니고, 한남동 사무실 자기 소유 아니며 업무적으로만 관계 있다고 함.

아시아나 마지막으로 탄게 2019년에 비지니스로 타이베이 갔다온거. 여러분 유튜버 원지의 하루 원지가 결혼을 발표했어요. 22 124003 조회 17291 추천 284 댓글 184. 원지는 그동안 방송 및 자신의 유튜브 채널에서도 열애 사실에 대한 언급이 전혀 없었던 만큼, 갑작스러운 결혼 발표는 한층 더 주목받고 있는 상황.

다만 해랑은 좀 어르신 위주 코스인거 같은 느낌이 드는게 아쉬운데 애는 코스가 어찌될련가 궁금하긴 했음아무튼 하루카타고 간사이공항으로 넘어와서 2년내로 없어지실 항공사 타러 옴. Stem분야가 이런데 원지는 디자인자국민 구인이 쉬운 분야으로 노동허가 받아서 일하다가 관두고 한국와서미국 밖에서 취업 영주권까지 신청해서 read more. 뭔가 원지의 하루 영상을 꾸준히 본 1인으로서 내 친구가 나 몰래 비밀연애 하다가 나한테 깜짝 결혼 발표한 느낌이 들기도 하는데요. 특히 일부 누리꾼들이 원지의 유튜브 채널 출연자 및 스태프 등을 중심으로 이른바 원지 남편찾기에 나서기도.

여푸 젖 비보이 활동 초기엔 비보이 닉네임 없이 본명으로 활동했는데, 아주 우연한 계기로 비보이 닉네임이 정해졌다. 예비 신랑에 대해서는 우연히 나를 더 자유롭고 편안하게 만들어주는 사람을 만나게 됐다. 유튜버 원지의하루 때문에 부부싸움한 블라남. 원지의 하루라는 채널에서 여행과 일상 브이로그로 사랑받고 있는 원지가 드디어 결혼 소식을 전했답니다. 인스타 화제 와 그야말로 대박 소식이 전해졌다. 연구실별 유해물질 연결이 잘못된 것은

오나라 스타킹 여행 유튜버 원지의 하루 이원지가 결혼 소식을 전하며 화제가 되고 있습니다. 올해 인터뷰에선 새로얻은 쓰리룸에서 남편과 산다고 했고 그게 뭘뜻하냐면 영어기초실력밖에 없는 원지가 미국에서 산다는 것은 유튜브용 구라라는. 아시아나 마지막으로 탄게 2019년에 비지니스로 타이베이 갔다온거. 나의 뿌리와 조상을 잘 알려면 남의 조상과 뿌리도 잘 아라야 하기에 여기에는. 📌함께 가고싶은 사람에게 공유해 주세요 📍veluvana벨루바나. 연우 젖꼭지

여자 연예인 유두 노출 21일 원지는 자신의 유튜브 채널 원지의 하루 커뮤니티에 결혼 소식을 직접 전했다. 예비 신랑 나이, 직업, 인스타 궁금해. 📌함께 가고싶은 사람에게 공유해 주세요 📍veluvana벨루바나. 21일 원지는 자신의 유튜브 채널 원지의 하루 커뮤니티에 결혼 소식을 직접 전했다. 2025년 01월 22일 252 유튜버 원지가 결혼한다고 밝혔다. 연주하는곰탱 라이키 디시

연우 펠라 대한민국의 여성 유튜버 여행 유튜버 부산진구 출신 인물 동아대학교 출신 미국 영주권자 1988년 출생 개명한 인물. 나의 뿌리와 조상을 잘 알려면 남의 조상과 뿌리도 잘 아라야 하기에 여기에는. 여행자 원지의 하루 살이가 너무 재밌더라고요 ㅎ ㅎ 썸네일 대표 사진 뽑는것부터 재밌음. 자아의탁해서 자기위안 삼다가 갑자기 결혼한다니까 어안이 벙벙 하제. 결혼발표한 유튜버 원지의하루 근황 ㄷㄷjpg 나갤러110.

여자 아이돌 야짤 유튜버 원지의하루 때문에 부부싸움한 블라남. 인스타 화제 와 그야말로 대박 소식이 전해졌다. 물론 결혼식 역시 가족만 모시고 아주 조용하게 소박하게 치른다고 했으니 원지 성격상 남편도 공개 안 할듯싶은데 일상을 올리는 유튜버이기에 언젠가. 없을때만 집촬영한다는 것 자체가 너무 기괴하고. 올해 인터뷰에선 새로얻은 쓰리룸에서 남편과 산다고 했고 그게 뭘뜻하냐면 영어기초실력밖에 없는 원지가 미국에서 산다는 것은 유튜브용 구라라는.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.