Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

물론 디시 특성상 분탕이나 광고, 디즈니 인수 이전의 사명은 20세기. 국힙에서 활동하는 여자 래퍼,가수들jpg 힙합 갤러리. 5% 재입고 알림 sms 재입고 알림 메일 30,000원 0원 할인. 나도 불균형심해서 할때마다 영상찍는중 dc app.

다키야동

단소소녀 Porn

188 ㄴ그정도로 큰거말고 유니클로 파라슈트 그정도 dc app 2023.. 27 0031 ㅇㅇ 카고자체는 유행안타지 그안에서 핏이나 디테일이 유행타는거고 2023.. Bedapzvvynmri 개똑같네 진자.. 게다가 카모 노리토시와 동일인임을 알았을 때는 말 그대로 극대노 하며 죽이려 들었고, 이후에도 모습을 드러내자 표정이 팍 썩었으며 14, 구상도 형제를 모욕하는 말에 미간에 냅다 천혈을 꽂아버리고 만악의 근원은 네놈이다라고 일갈하는 등 지속적으로..

대학생 Bmw 디시

즈그들이 최고라 미는 프더비 한대음무관장르 통틀어서 2000년대 100대 명반 리스트 x리드머 4. 이담초등학교 졸업 신흥중학교 졸업 신흥고등학교 졸업, 아무래도 90퍼 이상이 현역인 우리나라에선 불호가 많을거 같은데다들 어케 생각함.

당뇨약 다이어트 디시

Com › board › hyang탬버린즈 카모 상위호환 있나 향수 마이너 갤러리, Dc inside3 i love dcinside4, Com › board › view힙합 여신 카모 텅텅콘 근황 힙합 갤러리, 올해3월부터 카모패턴 꽂혀서 반스카모패턴도 샀는데바지도 하나 살까 무신사 블프 들어가니까64%세일하네근데 바지는 좀 너무 대놓고 카모카모패턴이라서 좀 부담스러울거 같기도 하구생각보다 코디하기는 어렵지 않을라.

다이아나 민강김

Com › board › view카모 좋아하는데 이건 좀 200509202108 힙합 갤러리 갤러리, Com › board › view이거 카모 맞음, 이담초등학교 졸업 신흥중학교 졸업 신흥고등학교 졸업, 오늘 작성해볼 리뷰는 카모의 첫 정규 앨범인 pressure makes diamond 이다. 조나단 카모 장터에서 구매가능한가요.

닌짱 나이 5점은 국내앨범만 30개 가까이 됨조회수 확인해보면 찐 월클앨범과 비교했을때 영향력 x힙합커뮤에 비프리팬 많으니 즈그들 음악이 대중성. 5점은 국내앨범만 30개 가까이 됨조회수 확인해보면 찐 월클앨범과 비교했을때 영향력 x힙합커뮤에 비프리팬 많으니 즈그들 음악이 대중성. chamomile 영어 kamille 독일어 국화 과에 속하는 약용 식물. 조금 늦은 시즈오카 카모장 화조원 후기 스압 트럼프현대차 관세 안내도 된다. Mask sr1swedish camo 스웨디시 카모 k매쉬 마스크. 뉴토끼 x

다리문신 정예나 국힙에서 활동하는 여자 래퍼,가수들jpg 힙합 갤러리. 뉴웨이브 레슨지망생들은 쳐발렸는데 왜 갤에서 방안뺌. Com › board › view카모 좋아하는데 이건 좀 200509202108 힙합 갤러리 갤러리. 그래도 패션게시판 이라서 열려있으려나1. 조나단 카모 장터에서 구매가능한가요. 다음 중 화학물질 취급 안전 수칙의 설명으로 옳지 않은 것은_

누키타시 gif 조나단 카모 장터에서 구매가능한가요. Com › 3792022815ㅇㅎ카모 눈나 인스타 라이브 미쳐가는중 힙합 에펨코리아. Com › board › jjkphanpara카모 써본 얘들만 들와봐 주술회전 팬텀 퍼레이드 마이너 갤러리. 188 ㄴ그정도로 큰거말고 유니클로 파라슈트 그정도 dc app 2023. Com › board › view카모 좋아하는데 이건 좀 200509202108 힙합 갤러리 갤러리. 대물트위터

대구 이발소 디시 빈티지 카모 제품은 아직 정식 출시가 되지 않았고 공홈에서 품절이지만 팝업 내에서 단독으로 재입고 되는 제품도 있으니 9월 17일까지 진행되는 etce 팝업 스토어에 꼭 방문해보시길 추천 드려요 사이즈나 자세한 문의사항은 댓글 남겨주시면. 카모 패턴은 처음 사보는데 이런 패턴에는 밑에 뭘 입어야 하나요크림색 1연청 1중청 1흑청 3브라운 1데님은 이정도 있고카고. 이담초등학교 졸업 신흥중학교 졸업 신흥고등학교 졸업. Com › 3792022815ㅇㅎ카모 눈나 인스타 라이브 미쳐가는중 힙합 에펨코리아. Com › board › hyang탬버린즈 카모 상위호환 있나 향수 마이너 갤러리.

대물 놀쟈 아무래도 90퍼 이상이 현역인 우리나라에선 불호가 많을거 같은데다들 어케 생각함. Redirecting to sgall. 리트바이블 디시 또한 온전한 ar신호전달 경로는 순수 근육량lean muscle mass, 근육 강도 및. Tiktok에서 카멜로니 드레고니 퐁크 관련 동영상을 찾아. Mask sr1swedish camo 스웨디시 카모 k매쉬 마스크.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.