Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

브뤼셀 공항 수하물 배송 서비스 by luggagent. 확인증으로 언제든 가방을 찾을 수 있습니다. 그래서 공항에 어디 짐 보관할 곳이 없나 찾다가 발견한 싱가포르 창이공항 짐 보관 서비스센터 내가 이용한 창이공항 짐 보관소 baggage storage는 3터미널에 있는 짐 보관소인데 3터미널 외에 1,2,3,4 터미널 모두 있다. 브뤼셀의 치안이 좋지 않다는 후기들을 보고 겐트에서 2박을 하기로 결정했다.

이레즈미 야동

그래서, 뚜벅이 여행자는 캐리어나 가방을 맡길 수 있다.. 지금 바로 온라인으로 radical storage와 함께 브뤼헤,브뤼헤 짐 보관소를 예약하세요.. 오픈런부터 유니버셜스튜디오 폐장시간까지 알차게 즐겼던 하루..

유치원교사 디시

의문의 발신자 디시

윤 드로 저 추천작 디시

당신의 가방의 무게없이 도시의 놀라운 것을 경험하고 마음의 평온함으로 어떻게 작동합니까, 체크아웃 후 비행기 시간까지 여유가 있다면 이곳에 짐을 맡기고 가벼운 몸으로 마지막 산책을 즐겨보세요. 젊은블루s 여행정보 90개의 글 목록열기. 그래서, 뚜벅이 여행자는 캐리어나 가방을 맡길 수 있다.

지금 바로 온라인으로 radical storage와 함께 브뤼헤,랑게스트라트 짐 보관소를 예약하세요. 와카쿠사산 기슭에 자리한 귀여운 사슴들이 있는 나라공원 다녀왔어요. 오픈런부터 유니버셜스튜디오 폐장시간까지 알차게 즐겼던 하루. 브뤼셀 공항 수하물 배송 서비스 by luggagent.

윤공주 분수 야동 Ecbo cloak allows you to easily store luggage at nearby shops using your smartphone, eliminating the need for coin lockers. 그래서, 뚜벅이 여행자는 캐리어나 가방을 맡길 수 있다. 정말 우연히 보관서비스를 해주는 곳을 찾았습니다 원래 사무실은 무슨 공사를 하는건지 이렇게 임시로 영업을 하고 있었어요 짐을 맡기면 안쪽 어딘가로 짐을 가지고 가서 넣고 요금을 받고 수하물 티켓을 챙겨줍니다 이곳은 오전 10시부터 저녁 8시까지 하네요. 프랑크푸르트 공항에는 짐 보관 서비스 포인트가 총 3군데 있습니다 대한항공 제2터미널, 아시아나항공 제1터미널 어느 항공사 이용하느냐에 따라 이용하실 짐 보관장소가 달라요 위치는 아래를 참고해주세요. 와카쿠사산 기슭에 자리한 귀여운 사슴들이 있는 나라공원 다녀왔어요. 율먹캠

윤공주 트위터계정 젊은블루s 여행정보 90개의 글 목록열기. 방 공간도 넓어 아주 편안하게 지냈습니다. Radical storage로 짐을 보관하세요. Ecbo cloak allows you to easily store luggage at nearby shops using your smartphone, eliminating the need for coin lockers. International ticket office 옆에 위치하여 있다. 이구로 미츠 리 죽음

의정부 포우사다 예약 크게보기 일본 오사카 근교 7개의 글 목록열기. Com › dbwls9435282 › 223368094620유럽여행 brussels 브뤼셀 미디역 짐보관, chez léon, bouche 카페. 브뤼헤 luggage storage in bruges by stasher. 큰 짐 때문에 사람들이 엄청 빨리 움직임 숙소는 그랑폴리스와 미디 역 중간으로 잡음 돌길이 엄청남 브뤼셀은 그랑폴리스 기준 근처 식당들은 늦게까지 하는 편 숙소가 그랑폴리스랑 걸어서 15분 거리였음에도 오후 4시부터 집 근처 가게들이 문 닫기 시작. 벨기에 브뤼셀 당일치기 여행 일정, 루트 런던에서 브뤼셀 미디역 미디역에서 짐 보관 10am 오줌싸개 동상 그랑플라스 기념품 쇼핑 맨하탄 버거 점심 예술의 언덕 mont des arts 브뤼셀 미디역에서 짐 찾아서 기차 타고 겐트로 이동 230pm 브뤼셀 여행 지도. 이맹동 노출

윤녕 남미새 오랫동안 짐 보관할 곳이 필요했는데요 검색을 해보니까 대표적으로 파리에 2개의 짐 보관 업체가 있더라구요 nannybag 네니백과 bounce가 있는데 제가 사용한 곳은 nannybag이에요 금액도 좀 더 저렴했고 짐 보관소가 숙소와 가까워서 사용하게 됐어요. 지금 바로 온라인으로 radical storage와 함께 브뤼헤,랑게스트라트 짐 보관소를 예약하세요. 브뤼셀 남역 락커 찾기, 물건 보관 브뤼셀 남역에는 꽤 큰 락커가 있다. 여행 중 짐 때문에 고생했는데 travellight 덕분에 정말 편하게 여행했어요. Qeepl은 전 세계 1000개 이상의 도시에서 이용되고 있습니다.

이라마치오 웹툰 이번 여행 최종 목적지인 암스테르담에 오후 7시쯤 도착하고, 그다음 날은 벨기에 브뤼셀로 이동할 예정이. 짐 보관용 가격과 배송용 가격이 이원화 되어있고 짐 크기별로 가격대가 다릅니다. 젊은블루s 여행정보 90개의 글 목록열기. 짐 보관에 대한 규정은 생각보다 까다롭고 복잡해요. 방 공간도 넓어 아주 편안하게 지냈습니다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.