Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

86cm 포르쉐 포르쉐911 포르쉐gt3 포르쉐녀 슈퍼카 포르쉐 타는 누나. Tiktok video from 🪬lucky finds🧿 @mon. 중국청년망은 지난달 31일현지시각 충칭의 한 도로에서 여성 운전자가 자신의 운전을 방해했다는 이유로 상대 운전자의 뺨을 때렸다고 전했다. 그러면서 우리가 너를 죽여도 보상금으로 20만 위안 약 3800만원만 주면 된다.

@mutou_ayaka

@qkrgktkxks 디시

조민 씨는 빨간색 외제차 포르쉐를 탄 적이 없다, 이 3명이 거짓을 폭로했다 가세연 세 사람은 제보를 받았는데 그 제보가 아니라는 증거도 없지 않느냐 했지만 법원은 받아들이지.. 방송 활동 위축, 정신적 고통 등 피해.. 바람핀 남친 포르쉐 박살냈는데알고 보니 렌트카ㅋㅋㅋ.. Affiliatemarketing tiktokaffiliate affiliate kayanatinto labanlang..

99일 스피드 런 사이트

20살 구치소, 30대가 20살 번따, 20살 릴스, 107 likes, 13 comments kjs37768 on janu 포르쉐 타는 누나, 포르쉐를 타고 계신 20대 여성의 특별한 라이프스타일을 만나보세요. 그녀는 전에 한번도 포르쉐를 운전해 본.

유북 포르쉐 녀운전사 대중에게 사과, 남편 면직당해 인민넷, Tvinig에서 방영중인 아일랜드에 포르쉐가 협찬을 하였다. 중앙일보 it 담당과 중앙sunday 경제 사회 에디터로 기자 생활 30년을 채웠다. 경찰이 조국 법무부 장관 후보자의 딸28이 허위사실 유포로 신고한 사건을 경남 양산경찰서에 배당하고 본격 수사에 착수했다. 방송 활동 위축, 정신적 고통 등 피해, 포르쉐에서 전기차라고 하면 타이칸을 떠올릴 수 있는데.

Ahoo08 ライブ

그러면서 우리가 너를 죽여도 보상금으로 20만 위안 약 3800만원만 주면 된다.. 조국 측이 가세연을 상대로 민형사 소송 진행, 일부 승소.. 107 likes, 13 comments kjs37768 on janu 포르쉐 타는 누나..

18세의 nikki catsouras, aka porche girl 가 아버지의 포르쉐 스포츠카를 운전하다 끔찍한 차사고로 사망함. 포르쉐를 타고 계신 20대 여성의 특별한 라이프스타일을 만나보세요, 이들은 유튜브 방송에서 조씨를 ‘부산대 의학전문대학원 의전원 포르쉐녀’라 지칭하며 학교에 다닐 당시 빨간색 포르쉐를 타고 다녔다는 취지로 발언했다.

Com › reel › 1418844396294093남친 믿고 설치던 포르쉐녀 결국 참교육 당했다 shorts 수하미디어. Tvinig에서 방영중인 아일랜드에 포르쉐가 협찬을 하였다. Tiktok video from brie ali artist🎙️ @loveshaeedy i’m not fixing the captions figure it out 😭 fyp viral relatable gym fypage. 이들은 유튜브 방송에서 조씨를 ‘부산대 의학전문대학원 의전원 포르쉐녀’라 지칭하며 학교에 다닐 당시 빨간색 포르쉐를 타고 다녔다는 취지로 발언했다, 방송 활동 위축, 정신적 고통 등 피해. 고급 승용차를 몰던 운전자가 상대 차주를 폭행해 논란에 휩싸였다.

Abc81732

암튼 미모의여성인데 술마시고 운전, 시속 200kmh에서 박았나,그랬을겁니다, Redd3 capcut memecut foryoupage explorepage. 방송 활동 위축, 정신적 고통 등 피해. 107 likes, 13 comments kjs37768 on janu 포르쉐 타는 누나. 중국청년망은 지난달 31일현지시각 충칭의 한 도로에서 여성 운전자가 자신의 운전을 방해했다는 이유로 상대 운전자의 뺨을 때렸다고 전했다.

Likes, 0 comments _sigism_ on ma 911 타는 누님들이 젤 머시쪙 포르쉐911 포르쉐녀 911녀 포르쉐클럽코리아 pck 속초드라이브 박스터 타이칸 카이엔 파나메라 마칸, Original sound viralsarcazam. 2015 서울모터쇼, 숨은 미녀, 포르쉐녀 서진영. Com › hurucin › 220904965560포르쉐녀 네이버 블로그.

‘조국 전 법무부 장관의 딸이 빨간 포르쉐를 타고 다닌다’며 허위사실 유포 혐의로 고발당한 강용석 변호사 등 3명이 기소의견으로 검찰에 넘겨. 중경8월12일발인민넷소식근일,중경유북 渝北포르쉐녀운전사교통위법분쟁사건이대중들의주목을받고있다. 포르쉐를 타고 계신 20대 여성의 특별한 라이프스타일을 만나보세요.

니키의 어머니는 그녀를 불렀지만, 니키는 어머니를. 니키는 어머니와 집에 있다가 10분 후에 차고로 가서 아버지의 포르쉐 911 카레라를 타고 드라이브를 하기 시작했다. Likes, 0 comments _sigism_ on ma 911 타는 누님들이 젤 머시쪙 포르쉐911 포르쉐녀 911녀 포르쉐클럽코리아 pck 속초드라이브 박스터 타이칸 카이엔 파나메라 마칸.

@kjun3369 Tiktok video from 🪬lucky finds🧿 @mon. 조국조민 피해 내용 조민이 ‘포르쉐녀’라는 허위사실에 휘말리고, 가족 전체가 근거 없는 의혹과 신상공개로 명예훼손 및 사생활 침해. 매일 업데이트되는 수천 개의 새로운 이미지 완전히 무료로 사용 pexels의 고품질 동영상 및 이미지. Com › shorts › lcre2zh_mko남친 권력 믿고 설치던 포르쉐녀 결국 참교육 당했다 shorts youtu. 중앙일보 it 담당과 중앙sunday 경제 사회 에디터로 기자 생활 30년을 채웠다. 4785772 missav

@dadbodz520 86cm 포르쉐 포르쉐911 포르쉐gt3 포르쉐녀 슈퍼카. 86cm 포르쉐 포르쉐911 포르쉐gt3 포르쉐녀 슈퍼카. 유북 포르쉐 녀운전사 대중에게 사과, 남편 면직당해 인민넷. Redd3 capcut memecut foryoupage explorepage. 조민 씨는 빨간색 외제차 포르쉐를 탄 적이 없다, 이 3명이 거짓을 폭로했다 가세연 세 사람은 제보를 받았는데 그 제보가 아니라는 증거도 없지 않느냐 했지만 법원은 받아들이지. ahoo pikpak

@altt678 멋진 포르쉐 스포츠카들을 가까이 할 수 있어서 좋고, 유명한 모델 언니들을 지켜보면서 노력 많이 해야겠다라는 생각을 했어요. Com › world › article감히 포르쉐를 막아. Tiktok video from brie ali artist🎙️ @loveshaeedy i’m not fixing the captions figure it out 😭 fyp viral relatable gym fypage. 또 네가 운전하는 차는 정말 초라한 차라며 비슷한 차를 45대 사줄 수 있다고 조롱했다. ‘조국 전 법무부 장관의 딸이 빨간 포르쉐를 타고 다닌다’며 허위사실 유포 혐의로 고발당한 강용석 변호사 등 3명이 기소의견으로 검찰에 넘겨. @nababanaba

4756199 포르쉐녀 스톡 사진을 무료로 다운로드하고 사용하세요. Com › world › article감히 포르쉐를 막아. 바람핀 남친 포르쉐 박살냈는데알고 보니 렌트카ㅋㅋㅋ. 포르쉐걸 이란 이름으로 꽤나 충격과 화제를 불러 일으켰던 nikki catsouras 이란 이름의 10대 소녀의. 유북 포르쉐 녀운전사 대중에게 사과, 남편 면직당해 인민넷.

ahoo porn Engco kayang kaya ko. 17일 홍콩 사우스차이나모닝포스트scmp 보도에 따르면, 중국 칭다오. 포르쉐걸 이란 이름으로 꽤나 충격과 화제를 불러 일으켰던 nikki catsouras 이란 이름의 10대 소녀의. I’ve been feeling good lately ttyl 🏾original sound brie ali artist🎙️. 조민 씨는 빨간색 외제차 포르쉐를 탄 적이 없다, 이 3명이 거짓을 폭로했다 가세연 세 사람은 제보를 받았는데 그 제보가 아니라는 증거도 없지 않느냐 했지만 법원은 받아들이지.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.