Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

名稱 fc2ppv 素人顏值身材作者 只愛橋本有菜 頻道 成人其他 影片 169 人氣 199822 簡介 收藏專輯. 2025年不能错过的fc2极品颜值无码素人女优系列 29v68g 极品素人 20250813 推广 内容简介 2025年不能错过的fc2历史上极品颜值无码素人女优系列合集 本资源有29部视频作品，大小68g 本资源支持 百度盘 + pikpak 下载 内容图集预览. 2025年不能错过的fc2极品颜值无码素人女优系列 29v68g 极品素人 20250813 推广 内容简介 2025年不能错过的fc2历史上极品颜值无码素人女优系列合集 本资源有29部视频作品，大小68g 本资源支持 百度盘 + pikpak 下载 内容图集预览. モザイク破壊 真夜中に夫の帰りを待つ兄嫁の寂しさを.

モザイク破壊 真夜中に夫の帰りを待つ兄嫁の寂しさを.. Fc2素人 相關影片大全，嚴選 fc2素人 高清資源與經典合集。想找有中文字幕或高畫質的 fc2素人 內容？這裡提供最詳盡的分類.. 女主颜值极高，胸略平，啪啪啪从开始到结束总是笑得那么可爱，这部影片穿着特别个性，也是一部群p片，特别刺激，演技很好，可惜的是拍摄质量真的一般，精彩镜头太 read more.. 美女 louis chiang and 98 others 99 󰤦 1..

섹뜨

섹트 성병

소펨챈

2k subscribers subscribe, Fc2ppv4782528 数量有限 缺货明星级颜值与压倒性气场, 115和百度网盘并行指的是在日常更新8个的原基础上增加115方式的资源，算是加量不加价的行为，只推荐已有115会员的老鸟们使用。 应邀挑选整理了一些高能输出粉嫩白虎的素人片，. 22部fc2顔值素人 寶安區私影桌遊。 她硬控我80分鐘！深圳調皮搗蛋spa太好玩啦 探花還是少婦放得開！各種虎狼之詞，讓人聽得臉紅, 001分卷即可，其他分卷不用操作！ ！ 每个文件夹里的所有分卷, Fc2ppv 4726042 fc2初次公开，主视频露出脸部，m酱的口交很色情神篇颜值80，美貌压倒性的个人拍摄↓请务必观看xxx视频在线视频观看和下载.

Fc2ppv4792303 細身スタイル抜群の大学1年生・みほちゃん19歳。おしゃべりオタクちゃんが紐パン＆生ハメで乱れちゃいます！前編no, 25 更新）gif 极品中的极品 系列6 史上最全fc2汇总, Live › search › fc2史上不能错过的极品fc2史上不能错过的极品颜值无码素人女优系列合集8. 图文故事 高清多图预警！ 一口气盘点fc2美少女系列之必.

소추 남편

Club jerry hing󰞋35m󰞋󱟠 󳄫 影劇精剪：不愧是, 22部 fc2顔值素人🈚️碼精选 桃子 桃子來了 桃子巴士 桃子ok taoziok 桃子巴士 17. Club jerry hing󰞋34m󰞋󱟠 󳄫 變臉迷情：「吳彥祖」為報, Com top 250 movies collection.

Hash222d0d103dfe2295b67a94f04df844234cad8706917 迅雷.. Fc2 half korean beauty series ① thank you for your request..

名稱 fc2ppv 素人顏值身材作者 只愛橋本有菜 頻道 成人其他 影片 169 人氣 199822 簡介 收藏專輯. 清纯校园风，高颜值，推荐 双马尾清纯美眉小身材不错大奶子白虎鲍鱼被无套输出内射, 001后面的（删除）两字去掉！ 然后解压xxx.

수치플 영어로

001后面的（删除）两字去掉！ 然后解压xxx. Fc2 half korean beauty series ① thank you for your request. Fc2高颜值素人女神gif盘点1茶馆南+ south plus. 169 123456下一頁 10131 無碼fc2ppv827034 ついに.

손흥 민 양씨 디시 這篇來看由日網發起的「2023 fc2 of the year」票選活動，由網友選出心目中年度最棒的fc2素人，有您心中所愛嗎？注意來！ 未命名 13. Fc2ppv4792303 細身スタイル抜群の大学1年生・みほちゃん19歳。おしゃべりオタクちゃんが紐パン＆生ハメで乱れちゃいます！前編no. Com › zhtw › tagfc2素人 avcnn 免費成人短片 & 日本高清av線上看. Club 22部 fc2顔值素人 public group 󰞋 141k members join group 电影迷fans. Hash222d0d103dfe2295b67a94f04df844234cad8706917 迅雷. 소이밀크 라이키 레전드

센포스 Fc2ppv a片免费线上看 airav. 清纯校园风，高颜值，推荐 双马尾清纯美眉小身材不错大奶子白虎鲍鱼被无套输出内射. 素人お姉さんに罰ゲームと称してチンポぶち込み！, 電マとバイブでトロトロ 即堕ち人妻に生中出し ＜人妻レ○プ＞結婚式直後の幸せ花嫁をntr凌辱！キチガイ. Fc2高颜值素人女神gif盘点1茶馆南+ south plus. Club jerry hing󰞋34m󰞋󱟠 󳄫 變臉迷情：「吳彥祖」為報. 송극장 트위터

섹스판타지 디시 Live › search › fc2史上不能错过的极品fc2史上不能错过的极品颜值无码素人女优系列合集8. Fc2 half korean beauty series ① thank you for your request. + healing music 16k views 4 months ago. 這篇來看由日網發起的「2023 fc2 of the year」票選活動，由網友選出心目中年度最棒的fc2素人，有您心中所愛嗎？注意來！ 未命名 13. 桃子巴士 22部fc2顔值素人🈚️碼精选. 솔로지옥 노출 디시

손오공 gif Fc2id （页面存档备份，存于 互联网档案馆）通过用户管理系统申请一个fc2 id和密码便能使用其大部分服务项目。 fc2视频使用者人数在日本所有视频网站中排第三位。 8 由于它的总部在美国，日本法律无法管理，因此很难删除不当内容。. Fc2高颜值素人樱花妹系列91部无码作品合集pikpak 492. Fc2ppv 4726042 fc2初次公开，主视频露出脸部. Club jerry hing󰞋34m󰞋󱟠 󳄫 變臉迷情：「吳彥祖」為報. Club jerry hing󰞋34m󰞋󱟠 󳄫 變臉迷情：「吳彥祖」為報.

소드아트온라인 히토미 Fc2高颜值素人樱花妹系列91部无码作品合集pikpak 492. 素人お姉さんに罰ゲームと称してチンポぶち込み！, 電マとバイブでトロトロ 即堕ち人妻に生中出し ＜人妻レ○プ＞結婚式直後の幸せ花嫁をntr凌辱！キチガイ. Fc2ppv 4726042 fc2初次公开，主视频露出脸部，m酱的口交很色情神篇颜值80，美貌压倒性的个人拍摄↓请务必观看xxx视频在线视频观看和下载. 2025年不能错过的fc2极品颜值无码素人女优系列 29v68g 极品素人 20250813 推广 内容简介 2025年不能错过的fc2历史上极品颜值无码素人女优系列合集 本资源有29部视频作品，大小68g 本资源支持 百度盘 + pikpak 下载 内容图集预览. Fc2ppv 4726042 fc2初次公开，主视频露出脸部，m酱的口交很色情神篇颜值80，美貌压倒性的个人拍摄↓请务必观看xxx视频在线视频观看和下载.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.