Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

이 앱은 중국 최대의 라이프 서비스 플랫폼으로, 현지인의 생생한 리뷰와 함께 다양한 정보를 제공합니다. 디엔핑 大众点评, 따종디엔핑 친구와 약속을 잡으면 약속 장소를 물색하기 위해 항상 사용하는 앱. 홍콩 3박 4일 다녀오기에는 너무 아쉬운 곳이다. 발 마사지도 동일하고 오일 마사지는 400바트입니다.

Sotwe 日向坂 シコ

Sotwe Ai Cfnm

Com › come2thomas › 224134630924원통사,취호공원251231 네이버 블로그.. 따종디엔핑 마사지를 어떻게 예약을 하냐면 여기 지도를 보면은 어디서 나오거든.. 근데 이제 마사지를 시작하는데 아니 앞전 건마보다 마사지 더 잘함.. 삼성전자 뉴스룸 독자 여러분, 안녕하세요..

치앙마이 로컬 마사지 추천비추천 후기, 꿀팁, 예약 방법 the home 더홈, giving tree 기빙트리, dn wellness dn웰니스 네이버 블로그 chiang mai_2024 12개의 글 목록열기, Com › come2thomas › 224134630924원통사,취호공원251231 네이버 블로그. 심천 션전 선전 발마사지 하는 곳 추천, 내돈내산 후기 디엔핑 聚美 养生馆 푸티엔 마사지 네이버 블로그 심천 shenzen 38개의 글 목록열기. 상해 3박4일 상해 필수어플 총정리 4탄 ι 따종디엔핑 사용법, 홍보 비용 대비 효과가 높음 광고 없이도, 꾸준한 리뷰 관리와 등록만으로도 방문율이 확실히 증가합니다.

Spankbag

중국생활팁 베이징 왕징 마사지샵 이윤당颐润堂 방문 후기. 마사지선택옵션 다들 동남아 여행을 가게 되면, 다시 한번 말하지만 중국여행 초심자라면 디엔핑이라는 어플이 필수 또 필수이다, 지하 1층으로 내려와 하마 선생에 갔다.

온몸 뭉친곳 아픈곳 다 풀어주고 생전 처음보는 방법으로 마사지 해주는데 진짜 개좋았음, 현지인처럼 알뜰하게 즐기는 방법, 지금 알려드릴게요. 더 저렴하기도 해요 직원분들 다 모두 친절.

최근 인기 대련 14개의 글 목록열기. 지역을 설정하고 근처의 식당, 카페 등을 검색하거나 네일, 미용실 등을 예약하고 쿠폰가에 이용할 수 있다. 90분에 169위안 35000원 대만족. 국내를 넘어 베트남 현지 마사지 예약도 마맵으로 편리하게 실시간 예약. 그래서 만약 마사지 찾으신다 하면 여기서는 귀만 받고, 제가 2편에 다녀온 발마사지에서 마사지 받는걸 추천드립니다.

상해 3박4일 상해 필수어플 총정리 4탄 ι 따종디엔핑 사용법.. 상해 3박4일 상해 필수어플 총정리 4탄 ι 따종디엔핑 사용법..

Spankbang 야노

심천 션전 선전 발마사지 하는 곳 추천, 내돈내산 후기 디엔핑 聚美 养生馆 푸티엔 마사지 네이버 블로그 심천 shenzen 38개의 글 목록열기. 외국인 관광객의 경우 앱을 사용하지 못하기. 상해에서 유명한 를 예시로 할인 가격으로 구매하는 방법 알려 드릴게요, 홍콩 3박 4일 다녀오기에는 너무 아쉬운 곳이다, 만약 내가 흔해빠진 spa에 간다면, 뭘 기대할 수 있을까.

sotwe simge barankpğlu 상하이여행 가격 착한발관리전문점 여행에서 피로 솨악 녹여. 그래서 앱은 따종디엔핑 dianping 깔아서 갔어요. 엘리베이터에 몇층 간다고 써있음 보통은 디엔핑 채팅으로 미리 예약을 하고 방문하는데, 여기는 아쉽게도 채팅이 없었다. 다중디앤핑으로 매출을 극대화할 기회를 놓치지 마세요. 충칭 여행기 1일차시대광장 카오위,해방비 마사지. spankbang 베드신

sone968 missav.ws 한국 돌아가기전에 헤어스파 받고 가세요😁 날씨 추워져서 따뜻한 두피 마사지 받고 피로 풀리는 느낌👏🏻 다음에 할머니 할아버지랑 같이가야 겠어요 효녀 코스프레😏 제가 간곳은 요즘 한국분들이 많이 받으러 가는 ‘헤어스파’ 에요. Com › 83상해 3박4일 상해 필수어플 총정리 4탄 ι 따종디엔핑 사용법 & 가입. Com › trip_com › 224073799753칭다오 마사지 가이드 여행 중 진정한 휴식을 즐기는 마사지샵 추천. Com › reel › dr9sxird7elinstagram. 다른시설은 또 저희보다 좋은 점이 있어서 자주 이용한 중국식 찜질방 ‍♀️ 4시간 목욕 + 아로마 마사지 1시간 + 12시간 휴식 + 식사제공 다해서 186元）. sone 490

sotwe cf 8점의 玖玖는 여러 발 마사지샵의 액기스만 쪽 빼놓은 듯한 알찬 구성이 특징. 칭다오마사지 칭다오마사지추천 칭다오마사지샵 칭다오마사지예약 칭다오마사지가격 칭다오마사지팁 칭다오마사지24시 칭다오마사지가성비 칭다오마사지샵추천. 장시간 비행, 좁은 좌석, 오래 같은 자세로 앉아 있으면 허리 근육이 긴장되고 통증이 쉽게 발생합니다 특히 여행객, 출장자, 환승이 많은 분들에게 매우 흔한 증상입니다. 상해 난징동루 발마사지 내돈내산 강추 디엔핑 예약방법 고덕지도 주소 华府俪人艾灸经络养生 南京东路店 술쟁이 쑤 ・ 2025. 8점의 玖玖는 여러 발 마사지샵의 액기스만 쪽 빼놓은 듯한 알찬 구성이 특징. sotwe.com

sotwe 보추 자위 마사지샵 전화번호는 있었는데 내가 손짓발짓 없이 마사지샵과 소통을 할수 있을리가 없다 이러면 보통 호텔. 가격도 정말 착한데 저는 70분 발마사지 + 각질제거 코스 따종디엔핑 쿠폰으로 104. 사실 이날 기분이 꿀꿀했었는데 마사지 받으면서 힐링받고 기분이 엄청 좋아졌어요. 칭다오마사지 칭다오마사지추천 칭다오마사지샵 칭다오마사지예약 칭다오마사지가격 칭다오마사지팁 칭다오마사지24시 칭다오마사지가성비 칭다오마사지샵추천. ️ 예약금 없음30분 이내에 오지 않으면 예약이 자동 취소된다는 안내가.

sleepyboy_x pikpak 최근 인기 대련 14개의 글 목록열기. 이럴 때 한국식 찜질방이나 대형 온천형 찜질방은 최고의 힐링 공간이죠. 상해에서 유명한 를 예시로 할인 가격으로 구매하는 방법 알려 드릴게요. 할인 가격으로 구매하는 방법 알려 드릴게요. 치앙마이 로컬 마사지 추천비추천 후기, 꿀팁, 예약 방법 the home 더홈, giving tree 기빙트리, dn wellness dn웰니스 네이버 블로그 chiang mai_2024 12개의 글 목록열기.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.