Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

지난 12일 서울 코엑스 앞에 프리허그녀가 나타나 화제다. 3 유머 주마등이 보이는 순간 2 테크뉴스 2023. 이카린님 av배우라는 직업이 하찮고 불법이고 게다가 반일 정서가 있으니까 악플을 막 달아도 된다고 생각하세요. 허연화는 12일 남아공월드컵 ‘한국그리스’ 전 응원이 열렸던 서울 삼성동 코엑스 거리에서비가 쏟아짐에도 불구, ‘월드컵 16강 진출’과 ‘한국을 응원하는 당신을 응원합니다’ 라고 적힌 피켓을 들고 따뜻.

신일녀 똥

이카린님 av배우라는 직업이 하찮고 불법이고 게다가 반일 정서가 있으니까 악플을 막 달아도 된다고 생각하세요. 바로 프리허그를 자처한 배우 허연화다. 제이 액터스 소속의 배우 허연화가 그 주인공이었다. 청순한 외모와 순수한 음색이 어우러져, 발라드와 하이틴 감성의 댄스곡에 완벽하게 어울렸다는 평을 받았습니다 그녀의 외모적 매력은 단순한 아름다움을 넘어 시대를.

1,989 followers, 136 following, 17 posts. 홍대에서 여대생들이 즐기는 트위터 문화와 프리허그현상을 탐구해보세요. 안는 순간 경찰서행 ㅠ 몸매 개지린다는 홍대 프리허그녀 ㄷㄷㄷ. 홍대에서 여대생들이 즐기는 트위터 문화와 프리허그현상을 탐구해보세요.

아리샤 약국 임신

권리원 @rewonrnas on instagram 체육대회 프리허그녀. 권리원 @rewonrnas on instagram 체육대회 프리허그녀. 강추위가 계속 되었던 어느 날, 어디선가 나타난 귀염폭발 사랑스런 팬더. 프리허그녀 배우 허연화가 월드컵 16강 진출과 한국을 응원하는 당신을 응원합니다 라고 적힌 피켓을 들고 비를 맞으며 프리허그를 하고 있다, 바로 프리허그를 자처한 배우 허연화다. 킹몸매 개지린다는 홍대 프리허그녀 ㄷㄷㄷ hbk 0건 471회 251102 2101 안는 순간 경찰서행 ㅠ 목록 글쓰기 댓글목록 등록된 댓글이 없습니다.

지난 12일 서울 코엑스 앞에 프리허그녀가 나타나 화제다, Com › reel › dmx2trlskid프리허그녀♥ 미늉이 좋아하는 춤 instagram. 3,786 followers, 177 following, 39 posts.

시청하세요 Evil 시즌 3

홍대 프리허그녀 private tutor in tamaki, 광주의 붐박스녀이자 프리허그녀의 일상과 닌자로서의 모습, 홍대 프리허그녀 ㅇㅇ 코스프레만담 뒷갤 미니 갤러리.

이번에는 관객들의 마음을 한 번에 사로잡았던 너무나도 예뻤던 영화 속 여배우들 7명을 소개하겠습니다.. 9,524 followers, 165 following, 26 posts 남성인권운동가 모에짱♥ @h_e_llllllll on instagram 본계 정지 상태라 부계 쓰고있는중이야 🔪 남성인권운동가♥ 닌자♥ 메이드쨩♥ 홍대 프리허그녀♥ 카톡 hellll 대피소 @mo_eee666.. 1,989 followers, 136 following, 17 posts..

홍대 여대생 트위터 keywords 홍대 프리허그녀 문화, 트위터 여대생 활동, 홍대에서의 트위터 사용, 홍대 젊은이들, 소셜미디어와 젊은이, 프리허그 캠페인, 홍대 지역사회, 대학생 문화 이해, 트위터 이벤트 홍대, 홍대 소통 문화, Com › board › pan_mlo홍대 프리허그녀 1탄, 12일 월드컵 응원이 열렸던 서울 삼성동 코엑스 거리에서 월드컵 프리허그녀 배우 허연화가 월드컵 16강 진출과 한국을 응원하는 당신을 응원합니다 라고 적힌 피켓을 들고 비를 맞으며 프리허그를 하고 있다.

시청하세요 honor society 온라인 무료 Net › 670057555ㅇㅎ 할로윈 프리허그녀 dogdrip. e스포츠, 게임기사 제공,포토,연예,스포츠,talk,커뮤니티. 청순한 외모와 순수한 음색이 어우러져, 발라드와 하이틴 감성의 댄스곡에 완벽하게 어울렸다는 평을 받았습니다 그녀의 외모적 매력은 단순한 아름다움을 넘어 시대를. 바로 프리허그를 자처한 배우 허연화다. 이번에는 관객들의 마음을 한 번에 사로잡았던 너무나도 예뻤던 영화 속 여배우들 7명을 소개하겠습니다. 아린이대장님 야동

신다혜 팬트리 이번에는 관객들의 마음을 한 번에 사로잡았던 너무나도 예뻤던 영화 속 여배우들 7명을 소개하겠습니다. 3 유머 주마등이 보이는 순간 2 테크뉴스 2023. 17일 월드컵 응원이 열렸던 코엑스 거리에서 월드컵 프리허그 걸스가 ‘이제는 16강’ 그리고 ‘아름다운 사람은 머물고 간 자리도 아름답습니다’ 라고 적힌 피켓을 들고 프리허그를 했다. Mp4 2 상 minerals 501,180,313 level 소장 20251103 013604 2일 전 read 11. 프리허그녀 배우 허연화가 월드컵 16강 진출과 한국을 응원하는 당신을 응원합니다 라고 적힌 피켓을 들고 비를 맞으며 프리허그를 하고 있다. 신혼 가전 디시

쌍베 리즈 광주의 붐박스녀이자 프리허그녀의 일상과 닌자로서의 모습. 1,989 followers, 136 following, 17 posts. 스압텍혐궁금한 이야기에 나온 아동학대 피해자의 고백 2 첨부파일. 2,021 followers, 143 following, 17 posts. 몸에낙서는 취향이아닌지라내기준 애국가보다 빨리식음 0. 신나린 유두

아베 미카코 Com › newsview › 20100613000918월드컵 프리허그녀 누구야. Com › board › pan_mlo홍대 프리허그녀 1탄. Com › newsview › 20100613000918월드컵 프리허그녀 누구야. 3 유머 주마등이 보이는 순간 2 테크뉴스 2023. 지난 12일 서울 코엑스 앞에 프리허그녀가 나타나 화제다.

신나린 상탈 지난 3일 문 후보가 서울 여의도 중앙당사 앞에서 사전투표 독려 퍼포먼스를. 17일 월드컵 응원이 열렸던 코엑스 거리에서 월드컵 프리허그 걸스가 ‘이제는 16강’ 그리고 ‘아름다운 사람은 머물고 간 자리도 아름답습니다’ 라고 적힌 피켓을 들고 프리허그를 했다. 프리허그녀 배우 허연화가 월드컵 16강 진출과 한국을 응원하는 당신을 응원합니다 라고 적힌 피켓을 들고 비를 맞으며 프리허그를 하고 있다. 홍대 프리허그녀 ㅇㅇ 코스프레만담 뒷갤 미니 갤러리. 프리허그녀 배우 허연화가 월드컵 16강 진출과 한국을 응원하는 당신을 응원합니다 라고 적힌 피켓을 들고 비를 맞으며 프리허그를 하고 있다.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.