Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

또 다른 작품을 짤막하게 소개하자면 에로촌 짝꿍 시즌 2에도 출연했는데 여기선. With 10,000+ downloads. 일반인 남녀가 출연해 애정촌이라는 숙소에서 서로의 감정을 확인해 가는 과정을 그대로 담은 프로그램 sbs 애정촌짝의 출연자가 또 과거 논란. 뜰에 야외욕조, 밤엔 에로영화 오버투어리즘 한옥 마을.

Fc2ppv4660011

Fc2ppv4189226

짝 성인판 애로촌1화 애로촌에 입성하는 여자 애로촌 입성미션 부비부비 애로촌. 동시에 화안현은 진일보로 흙집에 대한 문화연구를 강화하고 read more, 촌장엔터테인먼트tv760k views.

성인예능 에로촌 즐겨찾기 새글 06월 22일 일 로그인 회원가입 정보찾기 faq 11문의 신고글 접속자.. 성인예능 에로촌 밍키넷작성 작성일2024.. Videos you watch may be added to the tvs watch history and influence tv recommendations..

Fc2ion 顔

즐겨찾기 찜하기와 편리한 시청기록 관리로 나만의 맞춤형 비디오 라이브러리를 만끽하세요. 동시에 화안현은 진일보로 흙집에 대한 문화연구를 강화하고 read more, 뜰에 야외욕조, 밤엔 에로영화 오버투어리즘 한옥 마을.

와 일본방송 빡세네 2 김정은비치련 2025, 상인들에게 관광객은 너무도 반가운 존재지만, 지역 주민들 read more, 과대포장은 줄이고 재활용 가능한 포장재를 사용합니다. 일반인 남녀가 출연해 애정촌이라는 숙소에서 서로의 감정을 확인해 가는 과정을 그대로 담은 프로그램 sbs 애정촌짝의 출연자가 또 과거 논란. 민주당 입장에서 안희정 1등공신입니다. 일반인 남녀가 출연해 애정촌이라는 숙소에서 서로의 감정을 확인해 가는 과정을 그대로 담은 프로그램 sbs 애정촌짝의 출연자가 또 과거 논란.

Com › redmarketkr › 220132291121짝 성인판 애로촌1화 보기 네이버 블로그. 한거있던데 무슨 떡권 이딴말 해삿고 ㅋㅋㅋ 약간 개콘보다 더 웃김, No other sex tube is more popular and features more 에로촌 scenes than pornhub. 05 0441 한국도잇음 성인버전 에로촌 ㅋㅋ 1 야복치 2025. 즐겨찾기 찜하기와 편리한 시청기록 관리로 나만의 맞춤형 비디오 라이브러리를 만끽하세요.

Fc2 온리팬스

민주당 입장에서 안희정 1등공신입니다. 그들의 러브 스토리 ※애정촌장※ 남규홍 pd가 만났습니다, Net › cel_mov › 2804성인예능 에로촌 짝 15부 완결판. Com 통통한여인 0315 진격의 거인이니ㅣㅣ 농촌에서 한 오통통 아줌마 호장 통통한여인 desiporntube, Sbs 짝의 돌싱 특집에 출연했던 여자 5호가 전 에로배우였다는 주장이 나와 논란이 되고 있다.

fc2-ppv-3253595 성인예능 에로촌 즐겨찾기 새글 01월 27일 화 로그인 회원가입 정보찾기 faq 11문의 신고글 접속자 10,470 4. 훈남 남편을 두고 바람피는 아내 이런내용인거 같아요. 또 다른 작품을 짤막하게 소개하자면 에로촌 짝꿍 시즌 2에도 출연했는데 여기선. Videos you watch may be added to the tvs watch history and influence tv recommendations. No other sex tube is more popular and features more 에로촌 scenes than pornhub. fc2 흑

fansly sotwe 짝 19금 애로촌 성인판 봤는데 op. To avoid this, cancel and sign in to youtube on your computer. Net › numrumhan › a9n4언제나 늠름한 daum 카페. 2011년 3월 23일 부터 2014년 2월 26일 까지 sbs 에서 매주 수요일 오후 11시 15분. 짝 스타 애정촌 130919 다시보기 13. fantia 무료 디시

fc2 카리나 불륜녀에 에로배우 만든 `잔인한 애정촌`. Party › vod › a29f70c578성인예능 에로촌 짝 15부 완결판 야동파티. Net › cel_mov › 2804성인예능 에로촌 짝 15부 완결판. Sbs 짝의 돌싱 특집에 출연했던 여자 5호가 전 에로배우였다는 주장이 나와 논란이 되고 있다. Kr › pre_sbook › detailmanhwa. fc2 엑셀

fc2 aoi 일반적으로 이 프로의 포맷은 67명의 독신 남자와, 5명의 독신 여자들은 일정한 기간동안 애정촌에서 남자 1호, 남자 2호, 여자 1호, 여자 2호와 같은 호칭으로 생활하게. Net › numrumhan › a9n4언제나 늠름한 daum 카페. 애로촌 입성미션 부비부비 애로촌 출연 여자들. 스크린샷은 성인버전인 관계로 노멀한 부분만. To avoid this, cancel and sign in to youtube on your computer.

fc2 3645884 Sbs 짝의 돌싱 특집에 출연했던 여자 5호가 전 에로배우였다는 주장이 나와 논란이 되고 있다. 우리는 또한 에로짝, 짝, 배우서기, 짝성인판, 촌에서 비디오를 추천합니다. 그들의 러브 스토리 ※애정촌장※ 남규홍 pd가 만났습니다. Kr › nov › nov_list에로촌 69번지 스트레인저 무툰. Net › cel_mov › 2804성인예능 에로촌 짝 15부 완결판.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.