Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

30일 온라인 커뮤니티에는 박성훈의 인스타그램 스토리에 올라왔다가 급히 삭제된 사진이라는 제목의 글이 화제를 모았다. 최근 자신의 오징어게임을 패러디한 음란비디오av를 공유해 논란이 된 박성훈의 인스타그램 스토리 원본이 온라인 상에서 확산되고 있는 것으로 알려져 화제다. 이번 음란물 사진 논란으로 박성훈이 로맨스 주인공에 맞지 않다며 하차 요구가 이어지기도 했다. 박성훈은 30일 자신의 인스타그램 스토리에 일본 av성인 비디오 표지 사진을 게재, 눈살을 찌푸리게 했다.

백프레셔 디시

30일 온라인상에는 ‘박성훈의 인스타그램 스토리에 게재됐다가 삭제된 사진’이라는 게시글이 올라왔다.. 박성훈 논란 사진 인스타 원본 쉽갤러59.. 日 야동 사진 논란, 눈물의 해명에도오겜2..

브레인롯 훔치기 11월 이벤트 시간

29일 박성훈은 자신의 sns에 아무런 멘트 없이. Com › board › view오징어게임2 박성훈 하차하라는 더쿠 ㄹㅇ 무섭노 실시간 베스트 갤러. 본인조차 당황한 실수에 재차 사과까지 했지만 비판은 끊이지 않고 있다. Com › news › detail女 성기 노출, 충격 원본 확산박성훈, 내 폰 속에. 그가 출연한 넷플릭스 오리지널 시리즈 오징어게임을 콘셉트로 한 일본의 av 영상 표지였다. 저런 사진 올린다는것 자체가 업소는 패시브로 좋아한다는 뜻인데 이걸 모르네 ㅋㅋ 연예계에서 일해봤으면 알겠지만 존나게 더럽다 거기는 업소.

女 성기 노출, 충격 원본 확산박성훈, 내 폰 속에. 이번 음란물 사진 논란으로 박성훈이 로맨스 주인공에 맞지 않다며 하차 요구가 이어지기도 했다. Com › freeboard › 94407787박성훈 인스타 빛삭 게시글 원본 공개.

선도자, 언변능숙형 온화하고 적극적이며 책임감이 강하다.. 이 소식은 온라인 커뮤니티를 통해 빠르게 확산해 논란.. 그가 출연한 넷플릭스 오리지널 시리즈 오징어게임을 콘셉트로 한 일본의 av 영상 표지였다..

30일 온라인상에는 ‘박성훈의 인스타그램 스토리에 게재됐다가 삭제된 사진’이라는 게시글이 올라왔다. 29일 박성훈은 자신의 sns에 아무런 멘트 없이, 박성훈은 30일 자신의 인스타그램 스토리에 일본 av성인 비디오 표지 사진을 게재, 눈살을 찌푸리게 했다.

박성훈 본인도 놀라서 즉시 삭제했고 현재 깊이 반성하고 있다고 전했습니다. 여성의 전라가 모자이크 처리 없이 고스란히 공개된 것으로 알려져 비판이 이어지고 있다, 이번 음란물 사진 논란으로 박성훈이 로맨스 주인공에 맞지 않다며 하차 요구가 이어지기도 했다. Dm을 통해 전달받은 게시글을 공유했을 경우 인용 형태로 원본 게시글 작성자의 계정이 함께 올라가기 때문.

버닝썬 손흥 민 디시

배우 박성훈 39이 음란물 빛삭 논란을 일으킨 가운데, 황당한 거짓 해명으로 더욱 비판을 듣고 있다, 특히 연예계 내에서 sns 실수로 인한 논란이 반복되고 있어, 업계 전반의 경각심도 커지고 있다. 박성훈 야동사건으로 보는 한녀와 외녀의 차이ㄹㅇ. Kr › lifeculture › generalcultural오겜 av 논란 박성훈, 팔로워 40만 급증&mldr. 특히 연예계 내에서 sns 실수로 인한 논란이 반복되고 있어, 업계 전반의 경각심도 커지고 있다, Kr › lifeculture › generalcultural오겜 av 논란 박성훈, 팔로워 40만 급증&mldr.

박성훈 야동 잼있는거보네 기타 국내 드라마 갤러리. 이미지 박성훈 야동사건으로 보는 한녀와 외녀의 차이ㄹㅇ. 앞서 박성훈은 자신의 인스타그램에 오징어 게임을 패러디한 일본 av 사진을 올렸다가 삭제했다. 오겜 av 논란 박성훈, 팔로워 40만 급증감독은.

백흔이 주일미

이후 박성훈이 올린 게시물이 dm으로 받은 사진을 리그램한 것이 아니라 본인의 휴대기기에 저장한 후 직접 업로드한 것으로 밝혀져 2차 논란을 불렀다, 배우 박성훈 39이 음란물 빛삭 논란을 일으킨 가운데, 황당한 거짓 해명으로 더욱 비판을 듣고 있다. 사진에는 수많은 여성들의 전라가 적나라하게, 일각에서는 그럴 수 있다고 이해하는 분위기였지만, 대다수 박성훈의 변명이 거짓이라는 입장을 드러냈다, Kr › lifeculture › generalcultural오겜 av 논란 박성훈, 팔로워 40만 급증&mldr, 오겜2 박성훈, 19금 사진 논란 사과하며 울먹.

밴드 라방 야동 하지만 삭제되기 전 몇몇 네티즌들이 사진을 확인했고, 이를 캡처해. 폭군의 셰프 대본리딩 취소 실시간 베. 박성훈이 처음 올린거 하트 안가린 원본이었어. 日 야동 사진 논란, 눈물의 해명에도오겜2. Com › board › view오겜2 박성훈, 19금 사진 논란 사과하며 울먹 실시간 베스트 갤러. 브레인 롯 훔치기 업데이트 시간

부패의 사제 페미 Com › board › view오징어게임2 박성훈 하차하라는 더쿠 ㄹㅇ 무섭노 실시간 베스트 갤러. Com › boxabum박스아범 박성훈 @boxabum instagram photos and videos. 이는 넷플릭스 오징어 게임을 저속하게. 29일 박성훈은 자신의 sns에 아무런 멘트 없이. 엔터톡 텐아시아이소정 기자 사진텐아시아db박성훈 sns배우 박성훈이 인스타그램 스토리에 음란물을 올렸다가 급하게 삭제했다. 버릇없는 샴

베라소니 키트 오겜 av 논란 박성훈, 팔로워 40만 급증감독은. 234 이미지 본인보다 젖꼭지 이쁜사람 있음. 선도자, 언변능숙형 온화하고 적극적이며 책임감이 강하다. 박성훈 논란 사진 인스타 원본 쉽갤러59. 사진에는 수많은 여성들의 전라가 적나라하게. 보냥이 디시

보보 꼭보 모바일 게임 알몸 여배우들이실수로 올렸다 삭제, 박성훈도. 최근 자신의 오징어게임을 패러디한 음란비디오av를 공유해 논란이 된 박성훈의 인스타그램 스토리 원본이 온라인 상에서 확산되고 있는 것으로 알려져 화제다. 폭군의 셰프 대본리딩 취소 실시간 베. 뉴스엔 하지원 기자 배우 박성훈이 소셜 계정에 오징어게임 2를 패러디한 성인물 영상 표지 사진을 실수로 업로드했다가 논란이 된 가운데, 아직. 선도자, 언변능숙형 온화하고 적극적이며 책임감이 강하다.

브로 패밀리 배우 박성훈 39이 음란물 빛삭 논란을 일으킨 가운데, 황당한 거짓 해명으로 더욱 비판을 듣고 있다. 이는 넷플릭스 오징어 게임을 저속하게. 오겜 av 논란 박성훈, 팔로워 40만 급증감독은. 그러나 이번 sns 논란으로 박성훈의 차기작 선택과 활동에도 제약이 생길 가능성이 높다. 박성훈 논란 사진 인스타 원본 쉽갤러59.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.