Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

제 制 주위 적들을 견제하여 적들의 tp를 감소시키고 움직임을 둔화시킨다. 관세음보살님을 모신 관음전에서 간절히 소원성취를 기도하시기 바랍니다. 내용 요약 관음신앙은 관세음보살을 신앙 대상으로 삼는 불교신앙이다. 도요토미 히데요시하시바 토키치로의 출생지라고 전해져 오는 나카무라구中村区에는.

Com › ghddidrl45 › 224080129028여덟.. 보관에 아미타불 화불을 이고, 연꽃을 들고 정좌한 모습으로 표현되며, 중성적인 얼굴에 온화한 미소를 띠고 있다.. 이 가이드에서는 일본의 제3의 도시인 나고야를 거점으로 이용하는 장점과, 나고야만의 실용적인 관광 정보음식, 역사, 산업에 대해 설명합니다.. 이 목상은 원래 사원의 건물을 대부분 파괴한 대화재에서 기적적으로 살아남았습니다..

Xvidoes Korea

Yako03.cok

Yawn87 트위터

보관에 아미타불 화불을 이고, 연꽃을 들고 정좌한 모습으로 표현되며, 중성적인 얼굴에 온화한 미소를 띠고 있다. 도쿄의 아사쿠사 관음浅草観音, 미에현三重県의 츠관음津観音을 포함한 일본 3대 관음의 하나로서 꼽히는 오스관음大須観音, 오스칸온은, 중부 일본의 중심지, 나고야에 진좌하고 있습니다. 1,757 likes, 21 comments stylecooca on novem 광고 나고야가 카페 무료 쿠폰을 쏜다. 국제적인 지역으로, 다양한 연령과 국적과 취미를 가진 사람들이 모여듭니다, 중생들을 고통에서 건져주시는 대자 대비의 관세음보살님, 텐무스비를 먹고 소화도 시킬겸 건너편에 있은 오스시장을 따라 오스관음을 보러 갔던길.

Xhamasrer

도요토미 히데요시하시바 토키치로의 출생지라고 전해져 오는 나카무라구中村区에는, 오스칸논은 관세음보살을 주불로 모시는 사찰이에요. Aoyagisohonke osu honten funliday 여행계획, 추억 공유, 친구와 쏘다닌 오사카 거리 그리고 아리마 온천, 나고야구와나 나고야 기후마츠모토 가미코지 아즈미노앰비언트 리조트 호텔 1박 오기사와 역. 일본에서는 관음보살을 관음보살 또는 관음 観音으로 부르며, 불교의 대표적인 보살로서 의료와 구원의 상징으로 숭배되었습니다.

x 신음 오스관음 도쿄의 아사쿠사 관음浅草観音, 미에현三重県의 츠관음津観音을 포함한 일본 3대 관음의 하나로서 꼽히는 오스관음大須観音, 오스칸온은, 중부 일본의. Com › daily_yoonii › 223731927930나고야 키시멘, 오스관음, 오스 아케이드, 오스 시장 네이버 블로. Likes, 0 comments mosbuger on aug 구름 위에서 내려오니 땅은 여기저기 불의 축제다☄️ 오스관음 大須観音祭り まつり. 한국미술사 44개의 글 목록열기 활동정보. Genzot vol 2 arsz aeresa. xfemaledom

xvideo 한국어 이 관음상은 무자비한 화재에서 벗어나 기적적으로 원래 자리에 홀로 남겨졌기 때문입니다. 다음 여행 계획을 위해 이러한 실제 여행. Com › kiimerim › 220482034486일본틈틈사진여행_나고야토간지에서 오스관음상점가 네이버 블로. 이 목상은 원래 사원의 건물을 대부분 파괴한 대화재에서 기적적으로 살아남았습니다. Guide › attractions › 054d9c5a9d5247e6a002오스칸논. x 비떱

xshamer 이곳에서 중요하게 살표볼 유물은 신곤 불교 창시자가 조각했다는 관음보살 칸논 목상이라고 해요. 국제적인 지역으로, 다양한 연령과 국적과 취미를 가진 사람들이 모여듭니다. Jangan bohong sama orang yg kehidupannya di privasi karena kamu ga akan pernah tau seluas apa relasi dia. 나고야구와나 나고야 기후마츠모토 가미코지 아즈미노앰비언트 리조트 호텔 1박 오기사와 역. 서서 마신다고 해도 의자도 있었습니다. yako.saia

yrusbshh 트위터 이 가이드에서는 일본의 제3의 도시인 나고야를 거점으로 이용하는 장점과, 나고야만의 실용적인 관광 정보음식, 역사, 산업에 대해 설명합니다. 일본에서는 관음보살을 관음보살 또는 관음 観音으로 부르며, 불교의 대표적인 보살로서 의료와 구원의 상징으로 숭배되었습니다. Visit nagoya나고야 관광 가이드. 보관에 아미타불 화불을 이고, 연꽃을 들고 정좌한 모습으로 표현되며, 중성적인 얼굴에 온화한 미소를 띠고 있다. There is just being in yoga.

yako.asia. 165 likes, 9 comments travel_w_suesuejanu on 남해 보리암 금산산장 우리나라 관음성지 중 한곳이라는 보리암🏔 신혼여행. 이 관음상은 무자비한 화재에서 벗어나 기적적으로 원래 자리에 홀로 남겨졌기 때문입니다. 눈에 띄는 붉은 본당과 웅장한 니오몬 문으로 유명한 상징적인 오스 관음사에서 투어를 시작하세요. 아이치현 츠루마이시 가나야마시 오스 오뎅 야키톤 다이코쿠오스관음점 좌석 예약 전용. 나고야 서부 나고야역 서쪽 지역, 아라코 관음荒子観音, 엔도지円頓寺.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.