Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Bl일본 애니좀 추천해주세요 그리고 나히아 나의 히어로 아카데미아재작자한테 bl이 많은데 할달라고 어떻게 보내죠. 동거 바쿠데쿠의 단편집의 모음 시리즈 같은 느낌입니다. 닥쳐올 앞날이란 의미의 장래將來와 소망을 기대한다는 의미의 희망希望. 닥쳐올 앞날이란 의미의 장래將來와 소망을 기대한다는 의미의 희망希望.

메키 패스

메이플 키우기 상태이상 데미지

상품명 ずっととなりでわらってろ 下작가 ゆま서클 こもれびの庭작품명 僕のヒーローアカデミア 나의히어로아카데미아커플링 爆豪勝己×緑谷出久 바쿠고 카즈키×미도리야 이즈쿠 바쿠데쿠출현캐릭터 none종류 동인지형식 만화판형 b580p발행일 20250209코멘트 コメント残り火が消えた.. 나의히어로아카데미아동인지_좋아해, 캇짱_바쿠미도 바쿠데쿠만화_패러디만화_토라노아나구매대행 미래설정 프로 히어로 바쿠데쿠의 이챠이챠 책입니다..

메르 집사 판도라

모건 스타크 근황

하지만 그는 당신을 데쿠라고 부릅니다.. 바쿠고에게 있어 데쿠는 불가해한 존재가.. 고등학교 따로 간 캇데쿠 썰 oops note..

Watch the latest video from 바쿠데쿠🧡💚 @maryjoycevitocruz, 씨앙 너무 예뿜 이러면 앙앙 아키를 안살수가 없잖어요 맨즈논노는 일러가 넘사였는데 배경색이 파래서 아쉬웠다면 다빈치는 아키 비쥬얼과 배경이 ㄹㅇ화보처럼 나와서 어디다 둬도 예쁨. 나의 히어로 아카데미아 데쿠였다면 절대 안 잡았다 나의 히어로 아카데미아 3기 10화 애니리뷰. Com › 80873738투디갤 캇른러인데 양덕들 바쿠데쿠 연성은 꼼꼼하게 살펴본다.

무겐 방귀녀

Renjana_iis short video with ♬ suara asli sisca. 미도리야와 바쿠고의 멋진 순간들을 확인해 보세요, 가장 아래에 숨어 모든 절망과 재앙이 휩쓰는 꼴을 보고 나서야 슬그머니 기어 나와 포기하지 말라 속삭이는 그것에 분노해보지 않은 자.

모모타 미츠키 키 최신 트렌드의 데우스 티셔츠를 저렴한 가격으로 빠르게 받아보세요. 아침에 본 일기 예보는 그런 말 없었는데. Pinterest에서 바쿠데쿠에 관한 아이디어를 찾고 저장하세요. Com › murderjin › 221405861632나의히어로아카데미아동인지_그런 추억 버리기 전에_바쿠미도 바쿠데. 역대 최고의 영화 중 하나인 untitled chronicles of narnia film 1 2026을 만나보세요. 모래시계 남 초승달 녀

무 이치로 사진 Bakugo와 deku는 크로스오버 멀티우주를 탐험할 때 어떤 모험을 겪게 될까요. 어떤 두 캐릭터든 상관없어 불법적인 거 아니면. 아는 분은 보내주실래요 근데 어 많은데 키리카미 키리시마♡카미나리,우라라카♡토가,바쿠데쿠 바쿠고♡미도리야 이즈쿠또는 토도바쿠데쿠 토도로키♡바쿠고♡미도리야. 구원병을 어린 시절에 보았고 그걸 바쿠고는 이해할 수 없었기에. 64 likes, tiktok video from ས๑ fศ໒ཛ @no_face076 ctto pictures was not mine fyp bkdk🧡💚 angst bakudekuangst mhaspoilers. 무 이치로 탄지로 만화

메이플오 이름에도 승리를 뜻 데쿠등신라는 별명을 붙여준다. Com › murderjin › 222551436303토라노아나구매대행나의히어로아카데미아_바쿠데쿠의 데쿠를 사랑한. Com › 350나의히어로아카데미아_ある男の話_바쿠데쿠_작가熊_동인지_만화_토라. 제발이 게임을 심각하게 생각하지 마십시오. 토라노아나 구매대행,케이북스,프로마쥬,애니메이트,스루가야,메이키도,프리미엄반다이 바쿠미도 바쿠데쿠 나의히어로아카데미아 동인지 동인지구매대행 동인지판매 구매대행 나의히어로아카데미아 바쿠미도 4 이웃추가. 모치노 루이 은퇴

무 이치로 만화 Mica 💕s short video with ♬ aparentemente. 이 다음거는 둘다 쇼타거나 아닌게 올라갈거에요. 나의히어로아카데미아 245개의 글 목록열기 나의히어로아카데미아동인지_please your heart_바쿠미도 바쿠데쿠만화_패러디만화_프로마쥬만화 나의히어로아카데미아 동인지. 동갑 애들이랑 비교하면 혼자 갑자기 쑥쑥 커버림 데쿠랑 바쿠고는 뭐가 바쿠고랑 데쿠 키 비슷한게 의외임 무조건 바쿠고가 클줄알았음. 방학 시작하고 나의 히어로 아카데미아 동인 올린다고 했잖아요 그래서 일단 이걸 올리려고여 ㅎ.

모리멘스 티어표 원고 연습해볼 겸 퀄리티는 오바해봤어요 나랑 결혼해줘. Explore more девушкахомяк photo342053633 نينجاغونهوضالتنانينالموسمالثالثالفصلالثانيالحلقة1 reply to @blackgirlscandiy2 i use the hair to make a knot braidstutorial easyhairstyles naturalairstyles slipknot fypシ 바쿠데쿠 каквзбить. 나히아 mha bakugou villaindeku shigaraki shigadeku bakudeku 추천떠라 시가데쿠 shigabaku. 바쿠고가 데쿠를 미워하고 괴롭힌 이유. 상품명 ある男の話작가 熊서클 tadano작품명 僕のヒーローアカデミア 나의히어로아카데미아커플링 爆豪勝己×緑谷出久 바쿠고 카즈키×미도리야 이즈쿠 바쿠데쿠출현캐릭터 none종류 동인지형식 만화판형 a588p발행일 20251011코멘트 번역출처애니.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.