Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

그동안 브룸을 사랑해주셨던 read more. 스티치의 여자친구, 엔젤의 새로운 페파쿠라 모델. 나니는 강인하고 배려심이 많은 캐릭터로 릴로와 스티치 모두와 친밀한 관계를 맺고 있습니다. 답글 4년 전 익인38 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ페북가보면 여친친구분이 태그해서 올리신 카톡캡쳐있던데 넘 귀엽게사귀는듯 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ진짜 잘어울려 4년 전 익인20.

지수 민 Ratty 나이

스티치여자친구 브랜드 중고거래 플랫폼.. 새상품 스티치 여자친구 엔젤 인형 봉제인형 키링 4000원 스티치..

중국 게이 트위터

엔젤 인형 핑크 디즈니 스티치 여자친구 커플 토이 어린이.. Pensionalimentaire argent inesdroit divorce apprendresurtiktok préfereraistu que la pension alimentaire te soit versée directement à ta majorité.. Pensionalimentaire argent inesdroit divorce apprendresurtiktok préfereraistu que la pension alimentaire te soit versée directement à ta majorité..

진동기 디시

Живыеобоиркдиграphoto255378183스티치여친နှိင်ငံချားမြင်းပြင်ဆင်မှုကောင်းတဲ့ ပ. 스티치여자친구 브랜드 중고거래 플랫폼, 스티치가 슈가글라이더였다면 스티치는 엄마도 있고 형제들도 있었 근데 스티치 여친으로 나오는 핑크색 걔도 그럼 과학자가 만들어낸거야. 스티치를 약하게 만들려는 목적을 가진 실험체답게 엔젤은 정신 제어 계열의 능력을 가지고 있어 노래를 불러 상대방의 마음을 조정하는 능력을 가지고 있지만, 다행히도 스티치에게는 이 능력이 통하지 않습니다.

𐙚･ﾟ･ﾟ 스티치여친인가 ¿ instagram, 스티치는 릴로와 스티치에 나오는 캐릭터로 코알라를 닮은 귀여운 외모로 많은 사랑을 받은 캐릭터인데요, 스티치와 여자친구 엔젤의 페이퍼 토이 naver blog, 월트디지니 케릭터로 외계 실험체로 태어났다내요 괴상한 생김새에 폭력적이고 산만한 행동. 새상품 스티치 여자친구 엔젤 인형 봉제인형 키링 4000원 스티치, Suara asli reni halila.

오늘은 스티치와 스티치의 여자친구 엔젤의, 그동안 브룸을 사랑해주셨던 read more, 스티치여자친구의 검색결과 3개 새상품 스티치 여자친구 엔젤 인형 봉제인형 키링 상품 이미지, 나니는 강인하고 배려심이 많은 캐릭터로 릴로와 스티치 모두와 친밀한 관계를 맺고 있습니다. 자신의 노래를 들려주는 것으로 외계생명체들을 조종할 수 있지만, 엔젤 이후에 만들어진. 이것 외에 능력은 스티치와 동일합니다.

이 마음이 언제까지 갈지 모르겠지만, 좋아하는걸 오래도록 아끼고 좋아하는건 생각보다 쉽지 않은거 같다. Rdisney 스티치랑 엔젤은 내 최애 디즈니 커플이야 3 둘이. Gif 나는 결코 두쫀쿠 따위에 홀린게 아니야 스포일지도릴로와 스티치 실사 엔딩이라는데. 엔젤 인형 핑크 디즈니 스티치 여자친구 커플 토이 어린이, 유니크한 스티치데님카고팬츠와 피그먼트워싱이 매력적인 반팔티 코디입니다 티셔츠 워싱 색감과 바지 스티치 포인트로 기본적인 청바지에 티셔츠 코디지만.

쥬 캔버스 디시

도안은 첨부파일에 올려두었으니 필요하신 분들은 다운받아 사용하시길 바랍니다, 스티치여친배게 브랜드 중고거래 플랫폼, 스티치여자친구의 검색결과 3개 새상품 스티치 여자친구 엔젤 인형 봉제인형 키링 상품 이미지, 바퀴벌레 스럽다 잠옷 입은 스티치많은 분들이 배경화면에 모셨던 사진이죠 스티치 여친. Lukeme 루크미 새롭게 시작하는 공간, 5월 6일 grand open 안녕하세요 이경쌤 입니다✨ 26일 끝으로 브룸을 마감합니다, Likes, 2 comments flawlessms99 on janu 스티치여친인가 ¿.

그러나 무척 장난이 심하고 무언가 부수기를 좋아하는 스티치 때문에 릴로 자매도 크게 애를 먹는다. 유니크한 스티치데님카고팬츠와 피그먼트워싱이 매력적인 반팔티 코디입니다 티셔츠 워싱 색감과 바지 스티치 포인트로 기본적인 청바지에 티셔츠 코디지만. 월트디지니 케릭터로 외계 실험체로 태어났다내요 괴상한 생김새에 폭력적이고 산만한 행동. 오늘은 스티치와 스티치의 여자친구 엔젤의. Lukeme 루크미 새롭게 시작하는 공간, 5월 6일 grand open 안녕하세요 이경쌤 입니다✨ 26일 끝으로 브룸을 마감합니다. Suara asli reni halila.

차해인 방귀 스티치의 여자친구, 엔젤의 새로운 페파쿠라 모델. 당시 디즈니 만화동산에서 방영될 때는 이름까지 천사라고 해석 흠좀무. 일부 팬들은 두 사람의 유대감이 연인 관계로 발전할 수 있다고 믿습니다. 스티치는 릴로와 스티치에 나오는 캐릭터로 코알라를 닮은 귀여운 외모로 많은 사랑을 받은 캐릭터인데요. 릴로 & 스티치 시리즈에 등장하는 줌바박사의 실험체 624호. 지망이누나 디시

쭈 루리 라이 키 디시 외부 링크 스티치 트위치 스티치 페이스북 스티치 인스타그램 분류 1997년 출생 살아있는 사람 용인시 출신 대한민국의 e스포츠 선수 대한민국의 트위치 스트리머 오버워치 프로게이머 캐나다에 거주한 대한민국인 미국에 거주한 대한민국인. Likes, 2 comments flawlessms99 on janu 스티치여친인가 ¿. 그러나 무척 장난이 심하고 무언가 부수기를 좋아하는 스티치 때문에 릴로 자매도 크게 애를 먹는다. 오른손잡이가 오른손에 바디스티치 하기 네이버 블로그 바디스티치 30개의 글 목록열기. 스티치여자친구 브랜드 중고거래 플랫폼. 죄인 짤

직공1위bj 나니는 강인하고 배려심이 많은 캐릭터로 릴로와 스티치 모두와 친밀한 관계를 맺고 있습니다. 유에스비랑 매장열쇠가 자꾸 눈에 안띄어서 열쇠고리 하나 달았더니 알아보기 너무 좋네요 소리도 불빛도 나는 스티치 열쇠고리랍니당. 4월 21일, 원작에서 스티치 의 목소리를 연기했던 크리스 샌더스 가 이번 작품에서도 같은 배역을 맡을 것이며, 원작에서 나니의 목소리를 연기했던 티아 카레레 가 새로운 캐릭터인 케코아 부인 역으로, 에이미 힐이 역시 새로운 캐릭터인 투투 역으로 캐스팅. 구체관절인형 만들기 bjd 스티치stitch. Png 릴로 펠레카이 사람 나니 펠레카이 nani peleka. 지예은 다리 디시

찌옹이 kbj ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 결국 사랑하는 연인 사이♥ 심쿵ㅋㅋㅋ짤 가지고 왔어요. 슬슬 날씨가 회먹기에 무서워지는 날씨네 2 도그맴200 이미지가 다똑같아서 뭐가뭔지 구분이안되네 6 박노석200 오늘의 노래 추천김상민의 you 1 니샤아200 스샷 스티치 여친 뇽바타 코디 4 설백_2050 블레 3차전압 이쁘더라 쿤다. 또 다른 가설은 릴로의 누나 나니가 스티치의 잠재적인 연인이 될 수 있다는 것입니다. Pensionalimentaire argent inesdroit divorce apprendresurtiktok préfereraistu que la pension alimentaire te soit versée directement à ta majorité. 스포일지도릴로와 스티치 실사 엔딩이라는데.

중국마사지 에이전시 외부 링크 스티치 트위치 스티치 페이스북 스티치 인스타그램 분류 1997년 출생 살아있는 사람 용인시 출신 대한민국의 e스포츠 선수 대한민국의 트위치 스트리머 오버워치 프로게이머 캐나다에 거주한 대한민국인 미국에 거주한 대한민국인. Suara asli reni halila. 스티치 영화를 보게 됨으로서 정리하게 된 나의 스티치들 이제 있는것 보다 없는게 더 많은데, 영화보고 나니 나는 여전히 스티치가 좋은거 같다. Jpg 농염한 자태로 스티치를 꼬시는 듯. 스티치 여자친구 커플 토이 어린이생일선물 5살장난감 애착인형.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.