Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

이번에 새로 바뀐 발로란트 야시장 규칙이 있다기에 한번 정리를 해보려고 하는데요. 에피소드별 야시장 일정은 다음과 같아요. 이번 포스트에서는 발로란트 야시장 2023년 주기와 4월 일정에 대해 알아보. 오늘은 발로란트 야시장 주기 날짜 그리고 모바일로 상점 보는 방법에 대해 정리했습니다.

에피소드별 야시장 일정은 다음과 같아요.. 야시장의 주기, 스킨 등급, 꿀팁, 그리고 자주 묻는 질문까지, 야시장 이벤트를 완벽하게 이해하고 성공적으로 참여하는 방법을 알아보세요.. 이번 11월에 오픈했으니 아마 내년 상반기 1월에나 오픈하지 않을까 싶은 요즘인데요.. 발로란트 야시장은 플레이어들에게 특별한 혜택을 제공하는 이벤트인데요, 이 이벤트 동안 플레이어들은 무작위로 선택된 6개의 무기 스킨을 최대 49%까지 할인된 가격으로 구매할 수 있습니다..

설돌이 이벤트

이번에 새로 바뀐 발로란트 야시장 규칙이 있다기에 한번 정리를 해보려고 하는데요.. Nhạc nền huềdaef🇻🇳 phùng huề.. 오늘은 라이엇 발로란트 야시장 날짜와 주기 그리고 2024년 4월 일정도 함께 알려.. 그리고 계정마다 한번에 하나씩 가능합니다..

샤머호 Fantrie

발로란트 2025 야시장이 언제 열리는지 확인하세요. 발로란트 나만의 할인 상점 야시장 이벤트, 헷갈리시는 부분과 추가 제외되는 품목 모두 소개해드립니다, 최근 24년 5월 22일 6월 12일까지 22일 동안 진행이 되었습니다. 기간 한정으로 특정 스킨을 싼 가격에 구입할 수 있는 상점입니다.

최근 24년 5월 22일 6월 12일까지 22일 동안 진행이 되었습니다, 길면 6개월까지 걸린다고 밝힌 바 read more. Vct 한정판 스킨들은 일반적으로 1년 정도 걸리고 익스클루시브, 울트라는 23개월. 같은 경우는 3개월 주기로 등장하고 있습니다. 에피소드별 야시장 일정은 다음과 같아요.

31 0508 해당 댓글은 삭제되었습니다, Net › 발로란트다음야시장주기2024 발로란트 최신 다음 야시장 날짜, 일정, 기간, 시간, 주기, 오늘은 발로란트 유저라면 누구나 기다리는 특별한 이벤트, 바로 야시장에 대해서 심층적으로 파헤쳐 보는 시간을 갖도록 하겠습니다.

세부 에코걸 후기 디시

3223 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 달밤의야시장털기 모찌송헤드폰코디 주근깨메이크업 귀척빌런. 안녕하세요 2024년 4월 야시장 날짜가 확정됐다고 합니다, 오늘은 라이엇 발로란트 야시장 날짜와 주기 그리고 2024년 4월 일정도 함께 알려.

설돌 섹스

그만큼, 3개월 단위로 열리고 있다는 것을 알아두시면 되겠습니다. 발로란트 2025 야시장이 언제 열리는지 확인하세요, 에피소드별 야시장 일정은 다음과 같아요. Com › cap1_ › 223124783661네이버 블로그.

서지유 온팬 안녕하세요 2024년 4월 야시장 날짜가 확정됐다고 합니다. 2024 발로란트 12월 야시장 및 업데이트 소식 일정, 기간 발로란트 2024년 12월2025년 1월 야시장 일정이 공개 됐습니다. 발로란트 야시장 주기 project a 마이너 갤러리. 매번 23개월에 한번씩 주기적으로 오픈이 되어 많은 분들이 해당 기간을 많이 기다리실거라 생각됩니다. 그만큼, 3개월 단위로 열리고 있다는 것을 알아두시면 되겠습니다. 성형외과 cctv 연예인 디시

서울 술집 핫플 디시 인기 게임인 발로란트의 컨텐츠를 다루려고 마음먹은 와중 발로란트의 야시장 정보를 정리하게 됐습니다. Com › yong9260 › 223292922919발로란트 야시장 주기 정리 기간까지 네이버 블로그. 이번 포스트에서는 2024 야시장 일정, 시간, 주기에 대해서 알아보고, 야시장 슬롯 메커니즘과 함께, 언제 어디서나 쉽게 발로란트 상점을 이용할 수 있는 모바일 상점 사용법까지 상세히 다룰 예정이니, 끝까지 주목해주세요. 그만큼, 3개월 단위로 열리고 있다는 것을 알아두시면 되겠습니다. Nhạc nền huềdaef🇻🇳 phùng huề. 설리 대수대명

생득술식 뜻 댓글 6 전체보기 1,172개의 글 목록열기. 푸켓의 멋진 전망대, 신성한 사원, 캐슈넛 공장을 둘러보고 푸켓 코끼리 케어에서 코끼리 먹이 주기 체험을 해보세요. Net › 21285발로란트 야시장, 한정판 아이템과 주기적인 오픈 일정 바로보기. 발로란트 유저라면 항상 기대하게되는 컨텐츠중 하나인데요 저도 너무 기대중입니다😭 이제 막 발로란트를 시작하신 분들이나 야시장 시스템에 대해서 잘 모르시는 분들을 위해 먼저 설명드리겠습니다. 할인율은 10%에서 49%까지다양하며, 각 플레이어마다 서로 다른 제안을 받게 됩니다. 세뇌 히토미

설백 군대 발언 발로란트에서는 일정한 주기마다 야시장이라고 하는 상점이 열리는데요. 4월 11일부터 라이엇의 발로란트에서 특정 스킨을 할인해주는 발로란트 야시장이 오픈됩니다. 이번 포스트에서는 2024 야시장 일정, 시간, 주기에 대해서 알아보고, 야시장 슬롯 메커니즘과 함께, 언제 어디서나 쉽게 발로란트 상점을 이용할 수 있는 모바일 상점 사용법까지 상세히 다룰 예정이니, 끝까지 주목해주세요. 스킨의 등급은 스킨 제작 기간에 따라 달라진다. 2025년 발로란트 야시장 나오는 날짜.

설돌 가슴 야시장 주기는 최근에 종합해서 살펴보니 8월, 10월, 12월에 열린 것을 확인할 수 있었는데요 2달 주기로 계속해서 야시장이 열리고 있습니다. 안녕하세요 2024년 4월 야시장 날짜가 확정됐다고 합니다. 2026 야시장 나오는 날짜, 발로란트2025 11월 야시장 날짜, 발로 다음 야시장 날짜. 길면 6개월까지 걸린다고 밝힌 바 read more. 야시장의 주기, 스킨 등급, 꿀팁, 그리고 자주 묻는 질문까지, 야시장 이벤트를 완벽하게 이해하고 성공적으로 참여하는 방법을 알아보세요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.