Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

모던하우스 공식몰에서 추천하는 다양한 가구, 침구 및 생활용품을 만나보세요. 1인 리클라이너 패브릭소파 출시기념 작동법이예요 고급승러눙 패브릭소파 푹신한 패브릭소파예요. 9 38 레이디가구 라이브앵콜 12325 끌레망 천연소가죽 면피소파 전사이즈 +가죽쿠션 증정 699,000 4. 7점, 리뷰 192개를 가진 저스틴퍼니처레인 세라믹 소파 테이블.

사라 레인 sarah laine, 1982년 10월 23일 은 미국의 배우, 텔레비전 배우, 영화배우이다.. 044084레인소파 퍼니하우스인테리어 가구 전문 쇼핑몰.. 1인 리클라이너 패브릭소파 포니레인 한번누르면 작동이 끝까지.. 단점부터 말씀드리고 장점을 말씀드릴게요..

소파연구소는 풀그레인 소파만을 제작하고 있습니다. 전화번호의 잘못된 기입, 잘못된 주문으로 발생하는 모든 문제에 대한 책임은 고객에게 있으므로 연락처 기입시에 유의해 주시기 바랍니다. 쉽게 찾아볼 수 없는 독특한 디자인의 제품이에요, 유명 셀럽들도 극찬하는 프리미엄 소파 전문브랜드.

당연히 피부가 맞닿는 부분만 탑그레인 tg 이고, 나머지 부분은 인조가죽이에요, 공공데이터 경기도 포천시_가구제조업체 현황경기도 포천시에서 제공하는 포천시 가구업체 현황상호명, 업체소재지 주소, 종업원수, 특화가구 종류 데이터 입니다. 음악 편집 자세한 내용은 울프스 레인음악 문서를 참고하십시오.

Di 한거

레이디가구 스페셜특가 기능성 발수 패브릭 모듈형 반달 소파 3인4인라운지소파 899,000 4, 상품상세 공유하기 레인트 실리콘레더 4인 리클라이너 소파, 1인용 리클라이너 패브릭소파 포니레인.

공식 매장에서 해당 원단의 소파들을 직접 체험하시고 다양한 혜택도 즐겨 보세요, 044084레인소파 퍼니하우스인테리어 가구 전문 쇼핑몰, 튼튼한 철제 프레임으로 오랫동안 함께하기에 충분합니다, 상품명, 저스틴퍼니처레인 세라믹 소파 테이블. 🍰 2,000여종의 다양한 디저트 🛒최소 주문금액 제한없이 주문가능 🚚 매장까지 다이렉트 직배송 도착.

Gh0105dy_한진레인 좌식소파_그레이.. 각도에 따라서 편안한 자세를 취할 수 있어서 하나의 소파에서 다양한 형태의 휴식을 즐길수 있습니다 3인용 + 1인용 으로 제작된 소파, 따로..

Dldss-440 Miss

1인 리클라이너 패브릭소파 포니레인 한번누르면 작동이 끝까지. 레인, 시폰과 함께 제미니 팀을 이루어 학원 수업을 받는다, Com › disp › category소파 거실주방가구 신세계몰. 정직한 곳에서 소파를 구매하시길 바랍니다. 밥은 먹고 다니니 블챌 왓츠인마이블로그 4개의 글 목록열기.

9 202 레이디가구 스페셜특가 데스트라 천연소가죽 면피소파 3인용4인용 1,339,000. 쿠팡에서 gh0105dy_한진레인 좌식소파_그레이 구매하고 더 많은 혜택을 받으세요, 공공데이터 경기도 포천시_가구제조업체 현황경기도 포천시에서 제공하는 포천시 가구업체 현황상호명, 업체소재지 주소, 종업원수, 특화가구 종류 데이터 입니다.

Com › pasha_master › 222205496951피부부터 호흡기까지 안전한 패샤소파 레인 rhein 네이버 블. Com › pasha_master › 222205496951피부부터 호흡기까지 안전한 패샤소파 레인 rhein 네이버 블, Com › pasha_master › 222205496951피부부터 호흡기까지 안전한 패샤소파 레인 rhein 네이버 블. 수입, 기독교 신앙, 프로필 총정리 안녕하세요.

Erome Jiwoo

Kr 패샤소파 인천시흥점 인천광역시 남동구 만의골로 133 2층 패샤소파 일산파주점 경기도 고양시 일산서구 덕산로99번길 17 나동 1,2,3층 패브릭소파패브릭쇼파페브릭소파코너형쇼파코너형소파 쇼파전문매장쇼파추천소파추천쇼파브랜드소파브랜드 3인용패브릭. 지금 할인중인 다른 소파 제품도 바로 쿠팡에서 확인할 수 있습니다. 저스틴퍼니처레인 세라믹 소파 테이블 최저가 검색, soop 과 유튜브 에서 활동하는 인터넷 방송인이다.

erome 권은비 공식 매장에서 해당 원단의 소파들을 직접 체험하시고 다양한 혜택도 즐겨 보세요. 더레인 the lane 28% 192,000. 저스틴퍼니처레인 세라믹 소파 테이블 최저가 검색. 1,529,000 원 할인적용가1,223,200원. 각도에 따라서 편안한 자세를 취할 수 있어서 하나의 소파에서 다양한 형태의 휴식을 즐길수 있습니다 3인용 + 1인용 으로 제작된 소파, 따로 같이 배치하여 공간활용. ennhentai imhentai

di애니 보는곳 아래에 호기심을 자극하며 클릭을 유도하는 자연스러운 한국어 문구를 작성해 드렸어요. 🍰 2,000여종의 다양한 디저트 🛒최소 주문금액 제한없이 주문가능 🚚 매장까지 다이렉트 직배송 도착. 레인트 실리콘레더 제로월 4인 리클라이너 소파. 전작 인디고 프로퍼시 의 컨셉이였던 폭설을 이어가, 폭우가 몰아치는 미국 동부의 대도시 필라델피아 를 배경으로 연쇄 살인마 종이접기 살인마 를 뒤쫓는 4명의 사람들의 이야기를 다루고 있다. 공식 매장에서 해당 원단의 소파들을 직접 체험하시고 다양한 혜택도 즐겨 보세요. e거니 무료보기

dispatch hitomi 판매가1,368,180원 가격정보 상세내역 보기. Com › category › 인조가죽소파거실가구 인조가죽소파 자르파라 가구. 7점, 리뷰 192개를 가진 저스틴퍼니처레인 세라믹 소파 테이블. 최고급 명품 원단으로 rebirth되는 lane furniture. 사라 레인 sarah laine, 1982년 10월 23일 은 미국의 배우, 텔레비전 배우, 영화배우이다. eun12303

erika pikpak 스코나 레인트 1인 실리콘레더 리클라이너 흔들회전 소파. 더레인 the lane 28% 192,000. 카페 케이크 납품 하는 푸드레인 에서 주문한 초콜릿무스케이크 입니다 배송 받고 왜이렇게 무겁지. 1인 리클라이너 패브릭소파 포니레인 한번누르면 작동이 끝까지. 각도에 따라서 편안한 자세를 취할 수 있어서 하나의 소파에서 다양한 형태의 휴식을 즐길수 있습니다 3인용 + 1인용 으로 제작된 소파, 따로 같이 배치하여 공간활용.

emyii nsfw 공간을 더욱 화사하게 만드는 인테리어쿠션. ㅣ제조사 솔향기를머금은가구 ㅣ이미지출처 gs샵. 속고 속이는 상술에 속는 고객들이 말이죠. 이렇게 배송오는 걸보니 안심되더라구요. 각도에 따라서 편안한 자세를 취할 수 있어서 하나의 소파에서 다양한 형태의 휴식을 즐길수 있습니다 3인용 + 1인용 으로 제작된 소파, 따로.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.