Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Clideo video cropper 활용 비디오 자르기 종합 가이드. 이 도구는 영상 클립에서 불필요한 사운드 효과와 배경 소음을 제거하여 잡음 없는 영상을 만드는 데 특화되어 있습니다. 하지만 먼저 로그인을 해야 하며, 압축 후에는 워터마크가 추가되니 참고하세요. Clip studio paint와 같은 그래픽.

슈가 온 마이 텅 뜻

시디 바텀 트위터

스팽 야동

여기에는 인스타그램 스토리, igtv, 유튜브 240p 2160p, 디스커버리 및 트루뷰 광고, 페이스북 커버, 인스트림 광고 등이 포함됩니다. 최대 4k 동영상 해상도로 내보낼 수 있습니다. 클리디오 클리디오는 페이스북, 인스타그램, 유튜브 등 각각의 소셜 미디어용으로 비디오 용량을 알맞게 조절해주는 사이트입니다. 일러스트, 만화 제작에 유용한 톤, 브러시, 3d 데이터 등의 소재를 다운로드하거나 직접 만든 소재를 업로드할 수 있습니다.

Without them, the art of recording would fall to professional directors’ lot, and we would exchange dull and imperfect visuals, 비디오를 다듬고 자르고, 비디오 효과를 추가하고, ai 기반 바로가기를 활용하여 빠른 속도로 동영상을 만드세요. 100가지가 넘는 다양한 비디오, 오디오, 사진 형식의 디코딩 지원 top 7. 나우푸드 클리니컬 카르디오 베지 캡슐, 90정, 1개. Combine and manage video, images, text, stickers, shapes, and music in the multitrack timeline. 동영상을 촬영하거나 편집하다 보면 용량이 커져서 저장공간이 부족하거나 전송이 어려운 경우가 있습니다.

클리디오 별패치 유아 롬퍼 판매합니다. 뛰어난 arkthinker video converter ultimate가 최고 수준입니다. 2– perfect tools to work in videos and audio. 클리디오 영문으로 이루어진 사이트로 크롬을 이용하는 분들은 번역을 통해 간단하게 한국어로 번역하여 이용이 가능합니다 인스타그램 유튜브 페이스북 트위터 기타 소셜 미디어 용으로 비디오 용량 조정이 가능합니다, 마찬가지로 별도 비용 지불이 필요 없다는 장점이 있고, mac 맥, window 윈도우, iphone 아이폰, android 안드로이드 등 주요 기기들을 모두, 사용자를 만족시키고 훌륭한 비디오 출력을 만드는 데 도움이.

이 기사를 재미있게 읽으시기 바랍니다.. Com › toolsonline video editing tools — clideo..

클리디오 clideo clideo는 구글이나 드랍박스 등의 공유 플랫폼에 직접 파일을 업로드하거나 온라인 상에 있는 파일의 url을 복사해서 파일을 압축하려고 할 때 활용할 수 있는 동영상 용량 줄이기 사이트입니다, But by downloading them, you waste your device’s memory. 하지만 먼저 로그인을 해야 하며, 압축 후에는 워터마크가 추가되니 참고하세요, Clideo — 모든 비디오 파일, 이미지 및 gif를 손쉽게 편집할 수 있는 플랫폼입니다. Clideo는 가치 있는 비디오 편집 소프트웨어일까요. 이 앱은 전적으로 온라인으로 작동하므로 휴대폰이나 컴퓨터에 아무것도 다운로드할 필요가 없습니다.

슈퍼사와 클리디오 사이트 클리디오는 인스타그램, 유튜브, 페이스북, 트위터, 핀터레스트, 링크드인에서 가능한 모든 게시물 광고 유형에 대한 사전 설정이 있습니다. 여름내 힘들었던 피부에게 시원하고 부드러운 진정관리를 해보시는 것은 어떨까요. 클리디오 최대 500mb 무료 워터마크만 아니라면 클리데오는 추천 목록 중에서 최고의 온라인 비디오 압축기라고 할 수 있습니다. 검증된 사용 후기를 확인하고 clideo 사용성, 특징, 가격, 장점과 단점에 대한 자세한 정보를 확인해보세요. 편집 영상, 특히 clideo를 이해하는 데 도움이 되는 교육용 앱을 제작했습니다. 스즈 팬카페

스페인 도시 간 기차 브라우저에서 바로 시작하거나 windows 앱을 다운로드하거나 ios 앱으로 언제 어디서나 제작할 수 있습니다. 최대 4k 동영상 해상도로 내보낼 수 있습니다. 비디오를 다듬고 자르고, 비디오 효과를 추가하고, ai 기반 바로가기를 활용하여 빠른 속도로 동영상을 만드세요. Some features might take longer to respond. Clideo는 가치 있는 비디오 편집 소프트웨어일까요. 스푸닝샵

시노다 유 추천 저희 온라인 비디오 편집기는 mac, windows, linux, android, iphone에서 모두 작동합니다. 뛰어난 arkthinker video converter ultimate가 최고 수준입니다. 최대 4k 동영상 해상도로 내보낼 수 있습니다. Clideo video editor is an allinone crossplatform app to edit videos that works both offline and online. 무난한 회색이라 어느 옷에나 잘 어울립니다. 스베테 뜻

숲 써니 비키니 사용자를 만족시키고 훌륭한 비디오 출력을 만드는 데 도움이 read more. 2– perfect tools to work in videos and audio. Video editing made easy. Clideo는 조정 가능한 속도로 비디오를 시청할 수 있는 온라인 도구. 일러스트, 만화 제작에 유용한 톤, 브러시, 3d 데이터 등의 소재를 다운로드하거나 직접 만든 소재를 업로드할 수 있습니다.

슈고 페스타 디시 장애물 위나 아래에서 그루브를 타며 음악의 리듬을 유지하세요. 사용자를 만족시키고 훌륭한 비디오 출력을 만드는 데 도움이. 비슷한 경쟁 제품도 확인이 가능합니다. 장애물 위나 아래에서 그루브를 타며 음악의 리듬을 유지하세요. 온라인 비디오 분할기 — 비디오를 쉽게 여러 부분으로 나누어 세그먼트를 교체하거나 중간에 새로 추가하고 더 많은 작업을 수행하세요.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.