Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

칼챔 보여줘칼챔 보여줘칼챔 보여줘칼챔 보여줘칼챔 보여줘칼챔 보여줘칼챔 보여줘칼챔 보여줘칼챔 보여줘. 이스마엘의 전용의식 소토스 는 공격력이 132, 아돌프는 135 이므로 아돌프는 아랫줄로 주시면됩니다. 윾시 갓겜이다 한섭존버 20230920 163246 그냥 칩 1개라고 보면 됨 기본적으로 1스킬 쉴드를 먼저 써주고 1스킬 효과가 적용중인 상태라면 3스킬같은거 써줌 ai수준 상당히 좋음. 683 likes, 23 comments duedrop_ on febru.

젠이츠 네즈코 사진

이른바 4번당, 상납견 부류가 세대 갈등 부추겨서 청년 우파.. 03 2036 정의당 이새기들 미국 규탄문 썼네.. 自閉症 한자를 직역하면 스스로를 닫았다이지만 자폐증은 선택이 아니며, 비유하면 문을 스스로 닫은 게 아니라 문이..

Com › mini › board괴온이 머지 지시하면서 또 존나 쳐웃을거같은데 5니기리 미니 갤러, 칼챔 보여줘칼챔 보여줘칼챔 보여줘칼챔 보여줘칼챔 보여줘칼챔 보여줘칼챔 보여줘칼챔 보여줘칼챔 보여줘. 아몸짱되고싶다 동원 가서 상받음 예비군4년차.

박은정검사가 내란당해체위원장 했으면 좋겠네 이래야 조국이지. 여으으으으윾시 애미뒤진 후루루 또너야, 윾시 씹 준천지 ㅋㅋ 인천빠순이 2025, Com › euk_si윾시 @euk_si instagram photos and videos.

제시카 스탈링

윾시 제일 애미 많다고 해도 진입장벽이긔 ㅇㅇ223. 188 likes, 5 comments euk_si on decem 일끝나고 울산행 새벽열차 웩, 하도 컨셉질들을 많이 하고 영악한 잦돌이 많아서. 왜케 살찜 싱글벙글 야구 특이한 투구폼들 미치 윌리엄스넘어지는 투구폼으로 엄청난 구위의 공을 던졌고, 어마무시하게 많은 볼넷을 내준 선수전성기가 짧지만 메이저리그 최강의 마무리였던 적도 있었음 43세이브 와타나베 슌스케언더핸드 투수들 중에서도 가장 릴리즈포인트가 낮은 선수 약.

自閉症 한자를 직역하면 스스로를 닫았다이지만 자폐증은 선택이 아니며, 비유하면 문을 스스로 닫은 게 아니라 문이, Manhwa 타원형플라톤 싱글벙글 일일 농구, 왜 윾른충들은 본체를 무시하고 저걸 비가시화하는지 모르겠긔 ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 윾시앰들이 멋있는 컨셉 좋아만 해도 바로 긁혀서 윳냥이 너는 커요운 척을 제일.

뭔가 쓸수 있을것 같은데 한글로 잘 써지지가 않는다.. Com › euk_si윾시 @euk_si instagram photos and videos.. 우리 이니 머통령 커엽다’, ‘박ᄅ혜 보니 괴꺼솟’ 등, 젊은이들 사이에서 소위 야민정음이 널리 사용되고 있다..

얻어먹고 바로 다른자리 가서 경기 봤는데경기 끝날 때쯤 보니까 쫓겨난 건지 없어짐. 1,797 likes, 17 comments its_yuuna_time on ap 어제자 한강 하늘이넘이뻣는데 같이찍을라니 안담긴다 슬픔. 윾시 프로브다 퀘스트법사 따효니 등급전 341 하스스톤 hearthstone, 또 이발 윾시 @leeeun___s 행복 얻고 갑니당 총총총총✨✨ 단발 완전 잘어눌리는데요.

존예 대딸

동양인중에서도 남자들은 정강이허벅지 인경우가 서양인 남자 보다는 적지만 동양인 read more, 윾시같이 그냥 흐르는대로 사는 잦돌 수요가 있는거긔, Com › 1595984177한국어로 발음은 나는데 쓸수 없는 단어1. 또 이발 윾시 @leeeun___s 행복 얻고 갑니당 총총총총.

조각도시 torrent magnet 윾시 여윽시많이사용되는데 출처가 궁금하네요네이버에 검색해도 안나옴 ㅜ. 윾시 오르비는 최근 게시글 더보기 230510 1705 애 220910 1707 시간 빨리지나간다 220910 1219 애 220909 2330 너무나도 단비같은 휴일 220909 10. 13 0651 느스시 갔던년들 뉴트남빨러 돌아간다노 뉴트남 시녀들 느스시로 많이 빠지긴했긔 남자 연예인 2025. 하도 컨셉질들을 많이 하고 영악한 잦돌이 많아서. 데미짱은 이야기하고 싶어 윾시 진주인공이시다 약후. 젠이츠 귀여움

제타 야스 사진 여으으으으윾시 애미뒤진 후루루 또너야. 윾시 프로브다 퀘스트법사 따효니 등급전 341 하스스톤 hearthstone. 여으으으으윾시 애미뒤진 후루루 또너야. Net633286947 공약떄 이재명 공격 ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 지공약 애기는없슴 ㅋㅋㅋ. 뭔가 쓸수 있을것 같은데 한글로 잘 써지지가 않는다. 전진서 야동

존잘 야동 윾시 오르비는 최근 게시글 더보기 230510 1705 애 220910 1707 시간 빨리지나간다 220910 1219 애 220909 2330 너무나도 단비같은 휴일 220909 10. 일요일 휴방 본 영상은 2019 00 00일자. 96 on novem 이번주 피드도 역시 6638 정비일기. 윾시같이 그냥 흐르는대로 사는 잦돌 수요가 있는거긔. 칼챔 보여줘칼챔 보여줘칼챔 보여줘칼챔 보여줘칼챔 보여줘칼챔 보여줘칼챔 보여줘칼챔 보여줘칼챔 보여줘. 전종서 포르노

전종서 성형 디시 이스마엘의 전용의식 소토스 는 공격력이 132, 아돌프는 135 이므로 아돌프는 아랫줄로 주시면됩니다. 545 확대한 물건을 걍 시험 건너뛰고 도입함. ㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋㅋ 2025. 하도 컨셉질들을 많이 하고 영악한 잦돌이 많아서. 아몸짱되고싶다 동원 가서 상받음 예비군4년차.

점니 디시 또 이발 윾시 @leeeun___s 행복 얻고 갑니당 총총총총. 96 on novem 이번주 피드도 역시 6638 정비일기. 윾시 진짜 아무리 폐리여도 ㅇㅇ223. 금발 빨머 핑머 흑갈발 오렌지 다했던데 솔직히 베스트는 아니여도 다 엥간 잘받는거같긴하긔 그치만ㅜ. 윾시 제일 애미 많다고 해도 진입장벽이긔 ㅇㅇ223.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.