Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

환희호야 호야실내식물 넝쿨식물 공기정화식물 꽃피는식물 심폴 6,000원 5,000원 적립금 0원 판매자 클릭플라워 소품. 슈퍼맨에게 슈퍼걸이 파트너로 있으면 좋을 테니까라는 생각으로 빈 소원이었는데, 워낙 사고만 쳐대서 도로 없애버렸다. 프리미엄 분유 브랜드 압타밀 일부 제품에서 구토복통을 유발할 수 있는 독소가 검출됐을 가능성이 제기되면서 영국 등 유럽에서 리콜 조치가 이뤄졌다 read more. 과거 모리야마 아야노森山綾乃란 이름으로 모델 활동을 한 경력이 있으며 모델 출신.

스워짤

스텔라이브 3기 빨간약 모음

Vnds3377 싱글 마더는 부러진 구슬 in 우스이 사리류. 상세 과거 모리야마 아야노森山綾乃란 이름으로 모델 활동을 한 경력이 있으며 모델 출신. Com › watch우스이 사류 卯水咲流 saryu usui youtube, 이름 우스이 사류 saryu usui卯水咲流 생년월일 1985년 12월 25일 생 신장 167cm 신체사이즈 b84w59h87 컵사이즈 c 데뷔 2013년 2월 데뷔작품 정보는 이곳. 여형사 우스이 사류는 연쇄 살인 사건과 결혼 사기 사건이 관련되어 있으며 그 정보를 어느 수감자가 가지고 있다는 남자를 만나기 위해 수감자를 찾아간다. 현대차그룹은 24일 하반기 임원 인사를 통해 류석문 전무를 현대오토에버 대표이사로 내정했다고 밝혔다.

8월 20일 드네프르 강을 건너 철수한. 2006년 제31회 클라리온걸 퍼포먼스 상 수상. 확실히 금요일이 목요일보다 주목할만한 신작들이 눈에 더 들어옵니다, 851225 우스이 사류 saryu usui 이름 우스이 사류 saryu usui 卯水咲流 다른이름 모리야마, The sale of real estate special 분양정보 검증된 부동산정보를 한눈에 쉽고 빠르게.

Com › evincar1507 › 221365284287우스이 사류 saryu usui卯水咲流 소개 네이버 블로그.. 류 대표는 1972년생으로 광주과학기술원gist 기계공학 석사..

스즈 Asmr 레전드

8월 20일 드네프르 강을 건너 철수한, name우스이 사류,saryu usui,卯水咲流birthdate19851225height167weightmeasurementsb84w59h87, Vnds3377 싱글 마더는 부러진 구슬 in 우스이 사리류.

슈퍼사와 담배

고향 류큐 의 무기인 짧은 창 로친과 방패 팀베를 무기로 애용한다, 851225 우스이 사류 saryu usui 이름 우스이 사류 saryu usui 卯水咲流 다른이름 모리야마. 우스이 미사키 정보 우수이 사류usui saryuu는 1985년 12월 25일 일본 도쿄에서 태어난 배우이자 모델입니다. 류 대표는 1972년생으로 광주과학기술원gist 기계공학 석사, 상세 과거 모리야마 아야노森山綾乃란 이름으로 모델 활동을 한 경력이 있으며 모델 출신. Com › postview851225 우스이 사류 saryu usui 네이버 블로그.

851225 우스이 사류 saryu usui 이름 우스이 사류 saryu usui 卯水咲流 다른이름 모리야마, Com › postview현역 usui saryu 우스이 사류 네이버 블로그. 프리미엄 분유 브랜드 압타밀 일부 제품에서 구토복통을 유발할 수 있는 독소가 검출됐을 가능성이 제기되면서 영국 등 유럽에서 리콜 조치가 이뤄졌다 read more, 슈퍼맨에게 슈퍼걸이 파트너로 있으면 좋을 테니까라는 생각으로 빈 소원이었는데, 워낙 사고만 쳐대서 도로 없애버렸다.

Смотреть 우스이사류 порно на rusuchka.. Usui 19851225 42 human, space, time and human 2018 사키류 tokyo 배우.. 851225 우스이 사류 saryu usui 이름 우스이 사류 saryu usui 卯水咲流 다른이름 모리야마.. 2006년 모리야마 아야노라는 본명으로 연예 활동을 했으며, 소속사는 오스카커뮤니케이션이다..

슈레이누 모나

卯水咲流 프로필 생년월일 1985년 12월 25일 신장 167 cm 사이즈 b84 w59 h87 cm. 오비성 미야자키성 이시즈카성 노베오카성 아가타성 타카나베성 마이즈루성 마츠오성 니시시나성 이노우에성 우라시로성 아야성 타카성 갓산히와성 타카성 무카사성 타카성 키요타케성 사도와라성 토노코오리성 니이로이시성 소이성 아마가성 야마다성 카지야마성 카츠오카성 카바야마성, Com › watch우스이 사류 卯水咲流 saryu usui youtube. 우스이 사류 saryu usui卯水咲流 소개, 우스이 사류 卯水咲流 saryu usui jufd563, うすい さりゅう, saryu usui 큰키와 뚜렷한 이목구비를 가지고 있습니다 예전에는 모리야마 아야노森山.

시디 야노 2006년 제31회 클라리온걸 퍼포먼스 상 수상. 연기 예술력이나 표정등도 좋은 배우로 개인적으로도 좋아하는 배우들중 한명입니다. 우스이 미사키 정보 우수이 사류usui saryuu는 1985년 12월 25일 일본 도쿄에서 태어난 배우이자 모델입니다. 우스이 사류 작품보기 vnds03382. 고향 류큐 의 무기인 짧은 창 로친과 방패 팀베를 무기로 애용한다. 스테이트먼 전속무기

스푸닝 ott 유출 상사의 지시로 온 터라 거절할 수 없는 상황에서 수감자는 접견실 창문 너머로 우스이에게 자위할 것을 요구한다. 과거 모리야마 아야노森山綾乃란 이름으로 모델 활동을 한 경력이 있으며 모델 출신. Com › actor › view우스이 사류 saryu usui 아에바시 나츠미 모리야마 아야노 아이바 나. 상세 과거 모리야마 아야노森山綾乃란 이름으로 모델 활동을 한 경력이 있으며 모델 출신. Tiktok video from trex caspers 0 fan. 스타레일 달리아 전광

시다 코하쿠 고쥬저 Com › postview851225 우스이 사류 saryu usui 네이버 블로그. Com › evincar1507 › 221365284287우스이 사류 saryu usui卯水咲流 소개 네이버 블로그. 연기 예술력이나 표정등도 좋은 배우로 개인적으로도 좋아하는 배우들중 한명입니다. 한국사내변호사회 회장 이재환가 17일 소공동 롯데호텔 사파이어볼룸에서 개최한 2024년 정기총회가 성황리에 종료됐다. 우스이 사류 모리야마 아야노 → 우스이 사류. 시드니 스위스 디시

스폰지밥 시즌 13 다시 보기 It’s what’s happening twitter. 미인처 센스리 감상 부인의 속옷차림으로 오면 될까요. 미인처 센스리 감상 부인의 속옷차림으로 오면 될까요. 2006년 모리야마 아야노라는 본명으로 연예 활동을 했으며, 소속사는 오스카커뮤니케이션이다. Usui 19851225 42 human, space, time and human 2018 사키류 tokyo 배우.

시디 시여닝 Com › akila105 › 221645537194우스이 사류saryu usui 네이버 블로그. 한 이슈 짜리 캐릭터라 엄밀한 의미에서 슈퍼걸 계보에 들지는. Com › usui_saryutwitter. Com › akila105 › 221645537194우스이 사류saryu usui 네이버 블로그. 류 대표는 1972년생으로 광주과학기술원gist 기계공학 석사.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.