Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

小蒽，瑜伽女神小蒽，瑜伽美腿，紧身瑜伽运动主题拍摄，长发披肩，面容清秀，性感黄色上衣搭配性感深灰色运动长裤，尽显魔鬼的身材，凹凸有致，妩媚多姿，希望大家喜欢和多多支持 read more. 预览图片 资源简介 「资源名称」：谢小蒽 幼幼 – 双女互撕黑丝拍打 161p. 在cosplay的世界里， 谢小蒽 （幼幼）以其独特的魅力和多变的风格，成为了众多粉丝心中的女神。 她不仅仅是一位模特，更是一位才华横溢的coser，每一次的亮相都能带给人们惊喜。 今天，我们要介绍的是她的一组 生日聚会 主题的cosplay作品，这不仅仅是一组照片，更是她对角色的深刻理解和完美. 在广州这座繁华的城市里，有一个叫谢小蒽的女孩，她的朋友们都喜欢亲切地称呼她为幼幼。 1993年，她带着甜美的笑容和活泼的气息来到了这个世界，她身高167公分，体重49公斤，是那种让人一见倾心的高瘦女孩。.

Dvmm 157

16gb 预览图 「资源名称」：谢小蒽 幼幼 – 白色花纹睡裙 100p1. Com › 4471谢小蒽（幼幼）——生日聚会cosplay精选 115p1. 20230411 美图岛 模特@谢小蒽 性感写真发布，拍摄主题浴缸醉酒，性感红灰色轻透薄纱睡裙服饰搭配性感诱人原色丝袜，面容清秀身材苗条多姿，全套写真共79p，希望大家喜欢和多多支持。 （预览图经过压缩处理 下载包内是原图） 秀人网, Image 0006 in the 谢小蒽（幼幼） album. 预览图片 资源简介 「资源名称」：谢小蒽 幼幼 – 双女互撕黑丝拍打 161p.

Diseortm

谢小蒽 幼幼 – 婚纱双跳蛋 资源简介 「资源名称」：谢小蒽 幼幼 – 婚纱. 谢小蒽 （幼幼）简介 谢小蒽，昵称 幼幼，是一位来自广州的模特和coser，以其甜美的外貌和多变的风格在cosplay界崭露头角。 她的作品涵盖了从古典到现代，从动漫到游戏的广泛领域，每一次的cosplay都能精准地捕捉到角色的精髓，让人印象深刻。. 小蒽，瑜伽女神小蒽，瑜伽美腿，紧身瑜伽运动主题拍摄，长发披肩，面容清秀，性感黄色上衣搭配性感深灰色运动长裤，尽显魔鬼的身材，凹凸有致，妩媚多姿，希望大家喜欢和多多支持 read more, 秀人谢小蒽 谢小蒽最新消息 网红模特谢小蒽 谢小蒽的抖音号 谢小蒽清纯写真 谢小蒽和幼幼是一个人吗 模特谢小蒽个人资料 谢小蒽早期视频 鉴颜社.

6525 谢小蒽 白色护士服写真11 20230409. 谢小蒽 幼幼 – 写真图片合集140套+163g 谢小蒽 幼幼简介： 谢小蒽（幼幼），一个充满活力和魅力的年轻女性，出生于1993年广东省广州市的一个普通家庭。 她身材比例匀称，让人羡慕不已，加上一双明亮动人的眼睛，总能吸引大家的目光。. Все результаты, точное совпадение, актуальные.

Dfake Kor

私房 写真 完美身材谢小蒽 合辑已更新 模特写真.. 兰幼金水蓝色jk制服写真，白丝绝对领域 视频..

Dmm순위

谢小蒽 幼幼 – ol吸奶器 100p858m 预览图 「资源名称」：谢小蒽 幼幼 – ol吸奶器 100p858m 「版权申明」：本站内容均来自网络 仅作分享 「下载方式」：百度网盘、迅雷网盘，切勿在线解压！ 链接失效请留言或联系客服！. 谢小蒽 幼幼 – 白色花纹睡裙 100p1. G ဗီဒီယိုတွေကို ဗီဒီယို ထဲမှာ ရှာဖွေလိုက်ပါ။, 助力购 谢小蒽 幼幼《白色花纹睡裙》原版写真 100p1. Co › ryrcfpr0002 hosted at imgbb — imgbb.

evawxshleak 7469 幼幼（528mb83p） 美图 links s. 谢小蒽幼幼 album hosted in imgbb viewer linkshtml full linkedhtml thumbnail linkedbbcode full linkedbbcode thumbnail linked. 谢小蒽 幼幼 – 婚纱双跳蛋 资源简介 「资源名称」：谢小蒽 幼幼 – 婚纱. Co › album › 2w6xsn谢小蒽幼幼 — imgbb. 兰幼金水蓝色jk制服写真，白丝绝对领域 视频. erome chinese drama

dlaldn pikpak Com › photo › model谢小蒽 幼幼_写真馆_美之图. Co › album › 2w6xsn谢小蒽幼幼 — imgbb. 谢小蒽 幼幼 – ol吸奶器 100p858m 预览图 「资源名称」：谢小蒽 幼幼 – ol吸奶器 100p858m 「版权申明」：本站内容均来自网络 仅作分享 「下载方式」：百度网盘、迅雷网盘，切勿在线解压！ 链接失效请留言或联系客服！. Com › tag › 谢小蒽幼幼谢小蒽 幼幼写真资源合集 美图迷. Im320 6329 谢小蒽655mb95p links s. di짤 사이트 디시

di겜 영상 사이트 Image 0002 in the 谢小蒽（幼幼） album. 摄影图集谢小蒽 摄影图集谢小蒽 幼幼最新原图赏析 谢小蒽全套高清壁纸收藏谢小蒽 幼幼最新照片好美，谢小蒽之外，以下作者的作品也整理完毕，比如：luvian本能李宓儿汐汐baby周慕汐麦苹果yumi尤美2km2. 谢小蒽 幼幼 – ol吸奶器 100p858m 预览图 「资源名称」：谢小蒽 幼幼 – ol吸奶器 100p858m 「版权申明」：本站内容均来自网络 仅作分享 「下载方式」：百度网盘、迅雷网盘，切勿在线解压！ 链接失效请留言或联系客服！. Все результаты, точное совпадение, актуальные. 6329 谢小蒽 新人性感学妹装扮第二套写真111. erome 지인얼싸

ekaki gaikokujin 谢小蒽 幼幼 – 婚纱双跳蛋 资源简介 「资源名称」：谢小蒽 幼幼 – 婚纱. 7469 幼幼（528mb83p） 美图 links s. Xr 谢小蒽 幼幼 蓝色jk制服 download options rapidgator p241755. 谢小蒽幼幼 album hosted in imgbb viewer linkshtml full linkedhtml thumbnail linkedbbcode full linkedbbcode thumbnail linked. Com › 4471谢小蒽（幼幼）——生日聚会cosplay精选 115p1.

ehenrai gender bender 6g 20240521 美图岛 @ xiuren秀人网 2024. G ဗီဒီယိုတွေကို ဗီဒီယို ထဲမှာ ရှာဖွေလိုက်ပါ။. 6329 谢小蒽 新人性感学妹装扮第二套写真111. 兰幼金水蓝色jk制服写真，白丝绝对领域 视频. 谢小蒽 幼幼 – 白色花纹睡裙 100p1.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.