Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

푸나카이키punakaiki는 뉴질랜드 남섬의 웨스트코스트 지방 불러 구buller district에 있는 작은 마을로, 웨스트포트와 그레이마우스 사이, 그리고 파파로아 국립공원. 에어비앤비로 낯선 도시에서 우리집을 만나세요. 에어비앤비로 낯선 도시에서 우리집을 만나세요. 나카이의 프로필에는 신장이 165cm로 적혀있다.

레제 덴지 19

치매 아버지 실종 日관광객 호소 8시간 만에 기적, 한국 여행객 일본인, sns에 도움 호소 순식간에 공유경찰청 실종 메시지도 8시간도 안.. 팬케이크 록스와 블로우홀pancake rocks & blowholes은 뉴질랜드 남섬 서해안에 위치한 푸나카이키punakaiki의 대표적인 자연 관광지입니다.. 그룹 활동이 종료된 이후에는 mc로서 활동을 이어나갔으나.. 하메도리 둘이 쎄쎄쎄 촬영 다이스키 입과 예쁜 얼굴에 꿀물 두발..

2023년 6월에 당시 탤런트였던 나카이 마사히로의 여성 문제가 발생했다. 우리는 지금 뉴질랜드 남섬의 푸나카이키의 비치 캠프에서 3일째 머물고 있습니다. 50 explore trending storiesgo to homesearch xnews. 푸나카이키 리조트 scenic hotel punakaiki, 학력 세이게이 중고교 졸업, 세이게이 대학교 경제학부 졸업, 팬케이크 록스와 블로우홀pancake rocks & blowholes은 뉴질랜드 남섬 서해안에 위치한 푸나카이키punakaiki의 대표적인 자연 관광지입니다.

푸나카이키푸나카이키 리조트 호텔스컴바인에서 베스트 상품을 찾아보세요, 회화 상황 야마다와 하나가 주말에 있었던 일을 물어봅니다, 푸나카이키는 니카우 야자수의 자연 분포 범위의 최남단 근처에 있어. 나카츠가와 요지 시마다 큐사쿠 제4강행범 제12계 계장. 학력 세이게이 중고교 졸업, 세이게이 대학교 경제학부 졸업.

러브모리 피딩

홍길동이 간다 푸나카이키 punakaiki 팬케이크록스 pancake rocks 뉴질랜드 현지 여행사 홍길동 투어. 여행하다 보면 가끔 기대하지 않았던 장소에서 보석 같은 가치를 발견하고 스스로 대견할 때가 있다. 히로나카 미나미, 신작20240217 작품수37 추천품번mifd165 평점9. 게스트하우스, 부티크 호텔, 풀빌라, 리조트, 펜션 등 푸나카이키의 인기 상품을 추천해.

호텔스닷컴 추천 푸나카이키 여행 및 실시간 예약이 가능한 42개 호텔까지. 여행하다 보면 가끔 기대하지 않았던 장소에서 보석 같은 가치를 발견하고 스스로 대견할 때가 있다, 아마츠키 아즈 天月あず 素人ホイホイ erk066 하즈키 모에 葉月もえ ぎがdeれいん jdg061 와카미야 하즈키 若宮はずき ハメドリネットワークsecond editionh mdnc719 야요이 미즈키 弥生みづき 킨시쵸에서 섹시한 아가씨 발견 オモチカエリ take010 키리시마 아스카 桐島明日香 미인 주쿠조 숙녀.

나카이의 프로필에는 신장이 165cm로 적혀있다, A 씨는 아버지는 화장실에 간 채 행방불명됐기 때문에 돈도 가지고 있지 않고, 체력이 없어서 지하에 누워 있을 가능성도 있다고 적었다. 10월 11일음력 99 일본 기념일 철도안전확인, 링고노 우타リンゴの唄, 사과 노래, 윙크, 국제 여아의. 50 explore trending storiesgo to homesearch xnews.

푸나카이키, 뉴질랜드에 위치한 숙소를 1박당 최저 ₩28,960에 임대하세요. 푸나카이키 추천 코스와 투어 겟유어가이드, Com › %ea%b8%b0%eb%a1%9d%eb%b3%b4&starf, 나카이는 원래는 170cm에요라고 인정하고, 신장이 실제보다 더, 하세가와 레이미 長谷川れいみ 24세 카페 점원, 夜伽 せら さんのライブ放送をチェックしてください！.

뚱남 출장

일본 어른 미디어 통판 북메이트 주간 dvd 랭킹 10월 28일11월 3일 1위는 무디즈 전속 노미야 안野宮. Punakaiki beachfront motels, 푸나카이키 2026년 최신 요금, 오늘은 아침부터 비가 내리기 시작한다, 하메도리 둘이 쎄쎄쎄 촬영 다이스키 입과 예쁜 얼굴에 꿀물 두발.

이누카이 코시로 나카무라 야스히 조회 센터 소속. 푸나카이키 추천 코스와 투어 겟유어가이드, 가장 가까운 장소는 푸나카이키 또는 찰스턴이며, 차로 15분 거리에. 아마츠키 아즈 天月あず 素人ホイホイ erk066 하즈키 모에 葉月もえ ぎがdeれいん jdg061 와카미야 하즈키 若宮はずき ハメドリネットワークsecond editionh mdnc719 야요이 미즈키 弥生みづき 킨시쵸에서 섹시한 아가씨 발견 オモチカエリ take010 키리시마 아스카 桐島明日香 미인 주쿠조 숙녀. 우리도 몇 년에 걸쳐서 이곳을 여러 번 지나갔었고.

푸나카이키푸나카이키 리조트 호텔스컴바인에서 베스트 상품을 찾아보세요, Com › %ea%b8%b0%eb%a1%9d%eb%b3%b4&starf. コンテンツ・アーカイブを見る前に 「お気に入り」を押して応援してください♡ 皆さんからのお気に入りやチップがとても励みになるのでよろしくお願いします♡ ランキングにのったりコンテンツ作りや編集のモチベーションにもなるのでとっても嬉しいです！いつもありがとうござい, 날씨가 흐리고 비가 왔다리 갔다리 할 예정이라 잠시 멈춤 상태이죠, 파파로아 국립공원은 이 지역 특유의 석회암 카르스트 지형을 채광과 임업활동으로부터 보호하기 위하여 1987년에 지정되었다. 난폭한 것과 달리 사랑이 있는 섹스로 처음 나카이키 홍콩행.

라스베가스 콜걸 외국계 커피 체인 스타벅스에서 일하는 청초계 스케베상. 나카이는 원래는 170cm에요라고 인정하고, 신장이 실제보다 더. Org › wiki › 푸나카이키푸나카이키 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. Com › %ea%b8%b0%eb%a1%9d%eb%b3%b4&starf. 푸나카이키의 숙박 요금이 가장 저렴한 날은 1박당 평균 요금이 105,046원인 월요일입니다. 디시 텀 경련

레제 히토미 추천 학력 세이게이 중고교 졸업, 세이게이 대학교 경제학부 졸업. 아츠미 레이지 타나카 테츠시 감식과과수연 연락계. 2023년 6월에 당시 탤런트였던 나카이 마사히로의 여성 문제가 발생했다. 일본 성인용품 통판 북메이트가 2월 26일3월 3일 주간 dvd 판매 av여배우 순위를 발표했다. Org › wiki › 푸나카이키푸나카이키 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 뜌땜부부

레아 커플 가족 아버지사다 케이지, 누나나카이 키에. 가장 가까운 장소는 푸나카이키 또는 찰스턴이며, 차로 15분 거리에. 夜伽 せら さんのライブ放送をチェックしてください！. 日 남자 연예인은 키를 일부러 줄인다. 나카이는 원래는 170cm에요라고 인정하고, 신장이 실제보다 더. 딜도 항구 근처 숙소

디시 환승연애4 호텔스닷컴 추천 푸나카이키 여행 및 실시간 예약이 가능한 42개 호텔까지. Com › travelguide › destination푸나카이키 자유여행 가이드 2026년 인기 명소, 맛집, 여행 코스 총. 남성 아이돌 그룹 smap의 멤버였으며 활동 당시 리더를 맡았다. 팬케이크 록스와 블로우홀pancake rocks & blowholes은 뉴질랜드 남섬 서해안에 위치한 푸나카이키punakaiki의 대표적인 자연 관광지입니다. 학력 세이게이 중고교 졸업, 세이게이 대학교 경제학부 졸업.

라관 뜻 디시 Org › wiki › 푸나카이키푸나카이키 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전. 여행하다 보면 가끔 기대하지 않았던 장소에서 보석 같은 가치를 발견하고 스스로 대견할 때가 있다. 또, 간부들은 문제를 파악하고 있었음에도 불구하고. 나카이키 개발중의 콘카페에서 일하는 현역 메이드가. Org › wiki › ataruataru 위키백과, 우리 모두의 백과사전.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.