여성스럽다는 이유로 왕따 끝에 사망한 중국 남성 weibo 저우 펑의 죽음은 중국 사회에 성 고정관념 토론을 촉발했다 웨이 입 bbc news 2021년 12월 15일.

Will Human Rights Survive a Trumpian World?

Authoritarian Advances Threaten Rules-Based Order

The global human rights system is in peril. Under relentless pressure from US President Donald Trump, and persistently undermined by China and Russia, the rules-based international order is being crushed, threatening to take with it the architecture human rights defenders have come to rely on to advance norms and protect freedoms. To defy this trend, governments that still value human rights, alongside social movements, civil society, and international institutions, need to form a strategic alliance to push back.

To be fair, the downward spiral predated Trump’s reelection. The democratic wave that began over 50 years ago has given way to what scholars term a “democratic recession.” Democracy is now back to 1985 levels according to some metrics, with 72 percent of the world’s population now living under autocracy. Russia and China are less free today than 20 years ago. And so is the United States.

Of course, democracy is not a panacea for human rights violations; the US and other longtime democracies have their own histories of colonial crimes, racism, abusive justice systems, and wartime atrocities. More recently, authoritarian leaders have exploited public mistrust and anger to win elections and then dismantled the very institutions that brought them to power. Democratic institutions are crucial to represent the will of the people and keep power in check. It’s no surprise that whenever democracy is undermined, rights are too, as evident in recent years in India, Türkiye, the Philippines, El Salvador, and Hungary.

In this context, 2025 may be seen as a tipping point. In just 12 months, the Trump administration has carried out a broad assault on key pillars of US democracy and the global rules-based order, which the US, despite inconsistencies, was, with other states, instrumental in helping to establish.

In short order, Trump’s second-term administration has undermined trust in the sanctity of elections, reduced government accountability, gutted food assistance and healthcare subsidies, attacked judicial independence, defied court orders, rolled back women’s rights, obstructed access to abortion care, undermined remedies for racial harm, terminated programs mandating accessibility for people with disabilities, punished free speech, stripped protections from trans and intersex people, eroded privacy, and used government power to intimidate political opponents, the media, law firms, universities, civil society, and even comedians.

Claiming a risk of “civilizational erasure” in Europe and leaning on racist tropes to cast entire populations as unwelcome in the US, the Trump administration has embraced policies and rhetoric that align with white nationalist ideology. Immigrants and asylum seekers have been subjected to inhumane conditions and degrading treatment; 32 died in US Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody in 2025, and as of mid-January 2026, an additional 4 have died. Masked immigration enforcement agents have targeted people of color, using excessive force, terrorizing communities, wrongfully arresting scores of citizens, and, most recently, unjustifiably killing two people in Minneapolis, whose deaths Human Rights Watch has documented.

The US president of course has the authority to tighten US borders and enforce stricter immigration policies. The administration is not, however, entitled to deny legal process to asylum seekers, mistreat undocumented migrants, or unlawfully discriminate. In a well-functioning democracy, no electoral mandate should supersede domestic legislation, constitutional protections, or international human rights law. Trump’s team has repeatedly bypassed these guardrails.

The violations have not stopped at the border. The Trump administration used a 1798 law to send hundreds of Venezuelan migrants to an infamous prison in El Salvador, where they were tortured and sexually abused. Its blatantly unlawful strikes on boats in the Caribbean and the Pacific extrajudicially killed more than 120 people whom Trump claims were drug traffickers.

After the US attacked Venezuela and apprehended its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, Trump claimed the US would “run” the country and control its vast oil reserves. Despite paying lip service to human rights concerns under Maduro at the United Nations, Trump has worked with the same repressive apparatus to further US interests. Many Western allies have chosen to stay silent about these lawless moves, perhaps fearing erratic tariffs and blowback to their alliances.

Trump’s foreign policy has upended the foundations of the rules-based order that seeks to advance democracy and human rights, even if imperfectly.

Trump has boasted that he doesn’t “need international law” as a constraint, only his “own morality.” His administration has politicized the US State Department’s annual human rights report, stepped away from the global prohibition on antipersonnel landmines, voiced support for rewriting international rules on asylum, and skipped the UN’s Universal Periodic Review of the US’ human rights record.

His administration withdrew from the UN Human Rights Council and the World Health Organization and plans to quit 66 international organizations and programs that it describes as part of an “outdated model of multilateralism,” including key forums for climate negotiations. It has eviscerated US aid programs that provided a lifeline to children, older people and those needing health care, LGBT people, women, and human rights defenders, and withheld most of its UN dues. 

Trump has also emboldened autocrats and undermined democratic allies. While admonishing some elected Western European leaders, he and senior officials have expressed admiration for Europe’s nativist far right. He has favored autocrats such as Hungary’s Prime Minister Viktor Orban, Türkiye’s President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, and El Salvador’s President Nayib Bukele, while continuing decades of US support to Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Egypt’s President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi.

His administration has unjustifiably imposed sanctions to punish respected Palestinian human rights organizations, the International Criminal Court’s (ICC) prosecutor and many of its judges, a UN special rapporteur, and for several months, a Brazilian Supreme Court judge and his wife.

The institutional response in the US to Trump’s power grabs has been shockingly muted. Much of Congress, controlled by his own party, has not challenged his supercharged expansion of executive power. The leaders of the US’ most powerful technology companies have made significant donations and sought to placate the president. Some big law firms and prestigious universities have made deals rather than assert their independence, and some media organizations seem afraid to attract the president’s ire.

Has the US switched sides on the human rights playing field? While US engagement with human rights institutions has always been selective, China and Russia have long pursued an illiberal agenda. They stand much to gain from a US government that now expresses open hostility to universal rights. China and Russia remain strategic rivals of the US, but all three countries are now led by leaders who share open disdain for norms and institutions that could constrain their power.

Together, they wield considerable economic, military, and diplomatic power. If they were to consistently act as allies of convenience to erode global rules, they could threaten the entire system. Already, a loose international network of countries such as North Korea, Iran, Venezuela, Myanmar, Cuba, and Belarus work in concert with Russia and China. These leaders share very little ideologically but align in undermining human rights and promoting a regressive international agenda. In word and in practice, the US government is now helping them in this endeavor.

The US’ weakening of multilateral institutions also dealt a serious blow to global efforts to prevent or stop grave international crimes. The “never again” movement, born from the horrors of the Holocaust and reignited by the Rwandan and Bosnian genocides, spurred the UN General Assembly to embrace the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) in 2005. Meant to guide international intervention to prevent and stop atrocities in tandem with efforts to prosecute and punish serious crimes, R2P made a real difference in places like the Central African Republic and Kenya.

Today, R2P is rarely invoked and the ICC is under siege. In addition to Trump’s far-reaching sanctions, in December 2025 a Moscow court sentenced the ICC prosecutor and eight of its judges to prison terms in absentia. Moreover, despite being ICC fugitives, in 2025, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin was welcomed by Donald Trump in Alaska, and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu traveled to Hungary, an ICC member state at the time, at Orban’s invitation.

Twenty years ago, the US government and civil society were instrumental in galvanizing a response to mass atrocities in Darfur. Sudan is burning again, but this time under Trump, with relative impunity. Sudan’s Rapid Support Forces (RSF), which emerged from the militias that led the prior ethnic cleansing campaign, are again committing murder and rape on a mass scale. A growing body of evidence indicates that the UAE, a longtime US ally that recently made multi-billion-dollar deals with Trump, is providing the RSF with military support.

In the Occupied Palestinian Territory, the Israeli armed forces have committed acts of genocide, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity, killing over 70,000 people since the October 2023 Hamas-led attacks on Israel and displacing the vast majority of Gaza’s population. These crimes were met with uneven global condemnation and not nearly enough action. Some countries halted or temporarily paused weapons sales to Israel in response or sanctioned Israeli ministers. Trump, however, continued a long-standing US policy of almost unconditional support to Israel, even as the International Court of Justice is weighing allegations of genocide and has issued binding orders under the Genocide Convention to protect Palestinians’ rights.

Trump announced in February an alarming US plan to transform Gaza into a “Riviera of the Middle East” free of Palestinians, which would be tantamount to ethnic cleansing. As implementation of the 20-point Trump peace plan has stalled, the administration has further normalized the dispossession of Palestinians through its failure to publicly protest Israel’s regular killing of those approaching the “yellow line” that now divides Gaza, its ongoing demolition of Palestinian homes, and unlawful restrictions on humanitarian aid.

In Ukraine, Trump’s peace efforts have consistently downplayed Russia’s responsibility for serious violations. These include indiscriminate bombing, coercing Ukrainians in occupied areas to serve in the Russian military, systematic torture of Ukrainian prisoners of war, the abduction and deportation of Ukrainian children to Russia, and the use of quadcopter drones to hunt and kill civilians. Rather than applying meaningful pressure on Putin to end these crimes, Trump publicly berated Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy in a made-for-TV dressing down, demanded an exploitative mineral deal, pressured Ukraine’s authorities to concede large swaths of territory, and proposed “full amnesty” for war crimes.

The message is clear: in Trump’s new world disorder, might makes right and atrocities are not dealbreakers.

Com › lnjd › 22338481549120240315 학교폭력관련기사 feat, 중국의 학교폭력, 촉법소년 네. 중국, 충격의 학교폭력 kbs 240427 방송. 특파원 보고 세계는 지금 방송일 2024년 4월 27일 허베이성의 13세 중학생 3명이 동급생을 끔찍하게 살해한 사건이 알려지면서 중국사회에서도 학교폭력이 심각한. 시민들은 가해자들이 너무 가벼운 처벌을 받았다며.

앵커 멘트 중국 여중생들이 또래 여학생을 집단 폭행하는 장면이 인터넷에 유포돼 충격을 주고 있습니다.

중국, 충격의 학교폭력 kbs_354회_2024.. 국회 교육문화체육관광위원회 소속 새누리당 염동열 의원이 25일 교육부로부터 제출받은 학교폭력 및 조치현황 자료에 따르면, 전체 학교폭력 건수는 2012년 2만4천709건에서 지난해에는 1만9천968건으로 3년 새 19..

중국 부모들의 소황제 양성은 1자녀 정책 폐지 이후에도 계속되고 있다.

중국 여중생들, 집단 폭행속옷까지 벗겨.

중국, 충격의 학교폭력 Kbs_354회_2024.

Bbc는 진위가 확인된 영상을 통해 중국 북서부의 산시성 푸청에서 한 10대 소년의 사망으로 인해 폭력 시위가 촉발되고 있음을 확인했다.

보도에 따르면 중국 베이징시 남동부에 있는 퉁저우 通州구 인민법원은 최근 학교폭력 사건으로 입건된 15∼17세 여학생 14명에게 5∼7일간의 교화 프로그램을 이수하도록 지시했다, 갈수록 심각해지는 학교폭력, 특히 집단따돌림 왕따 문제는 모든 학부모들의 마음을 불안하게 한다, 중국에서도 학교폭력의 심각성이 사회적으로 대두되고 있는 듯 합니다, 2025년 7월 22일, 중화인민공화국 쓰촨성 장유시에서 학교폭력 사건이 발생했다. 그러나 이번에는 매우 비극적이고, 암담한 사건이 발생했습니다.

국민딸감 수아 허베이성의 13세 중학생 3명이 동급생을 끔찍하게 살해한 사건이 알려지면서 중국사회에서도 학교폭력이 심각한 문제로 떠올랐습니다. 하지만 양쪽에서 머리채를 잡은 두 여학생은 전혀 봐줄 생각이 없. 특히 당시 영상이 cctv 파일로 온라인에 공개되면서 중국 내에서 ‘학폭 논란’으로 번졌습니다. 홍콩 중문 대학의 저널리즘 교수 팡 커청은 온라인 악플에 항상 정치적 요소가 연관된 것은 아니지만, 중국 정부가 우익 민족주의자들이 가하는. 실제 학교 현장에서의 학교폭력의 현실은 영화나 드라마보다 훨씬 더 심각하다는 것에 안타까움이 느껴진다. 고희서 팬트리 야동

굶지마 솜깃 By 노연상 2013 — 근래의 학교폭력은 지속적인 괴롭힘과 따돌림은 물론 인터넷 카페, 카카오톡 등의 소셜네트워크서비스sns, 문자메세지, 그룹 채팅방 같은 사이버 공간까지 흉포화. By 노연상 2013 — 근래의 학교폭력은 지속적인 괴롭힘과 따돌림은 물론 인터넷 카페, 카카오톡 등의 소셜네트워크서비스sns, 문자메세지, 그룹 채팅방 같은 사이버 공간까지 흉포화. 각 국가의 특징을 이해하면서 학교폭력의 원인과 현상을 비교. 한국청소년보호위원회가 지난해 4월 전국의 초. 홍콩 중문 대학의 저널리즘 교수 팡 커청은 온라인 악플에 항상 정치적 요소가 연관된 것은 아니지만, 중국 정부가 우익 민족주의자들이 가하는. 과즙세연 오빠하앙

귀멸학원 네즈코 검찰 미성년자 전담부 장즈제张志杰 주임은 이밖에도 사소한 일로 학생들끼리 서로 다투어 경미한 범죄 행위를 저지른 경우, 가해학생이 피해학생에게 사과하게끔 지도 read more. 각 국가의 특징을 이해하면서 학교폭력의 원인과 현상을 비교. 중국 쓰촨성에선 10대 여중생이 또래 여학생들에게 집단 폭행을 당했는데, 가해자들이 솜방망이 처벌을 받았습니다. 중국 여중생들, 집단 폭행속옷까지 벗겨. 2017년 학교폭력 종합관리방안을 마련한 중국은 2020년에는 기존 형법을 개정해. 국산야동 mib

굿 라이브 티비 82 혐중 카르텔 초등학생까지 번진 혐중‥학폭에 왕따까지. 中 학교폭력 중노동 처벌 놓고 누리꾼 갑론을박. Com › news › detail말다툼 하던 친구 의자로 폭행&mldr. 한국청소년보호위원회가 지난해 4월 전국의 초. 같은 반 친구를 살해한 것에 대해 그치지 않고, 그 범죄행위.

구닝 도태 中 학교폭력 중노동 처벌 놓고 누리꾼 갑론을박. 옷 벗기고 뺨 때려中 여중생 집단폭행에 발칵. Kbsnews @kbsnewsofficial 님의 tiktok 틱톡 동영상 대구에서 중학생들이 동급생을 괴롭히고 영상을 생중계해 경찰. 근래의 학교폭력은 지속적인 괴롭힘과 따돌림은 물론 인터넷 카페, 카카오톡 등의 소셜네트워크서비스sns, 문자메세지, 그룹 채팅방 같은 사이버 공간까지 흉포화. 중국, 충격의 학교폭력 kbs_354회_2024.

This global coalition of rights-respecting democracies could offer other incentives to counter Trump’s policies that have undermined multilateral trade governance and reciprocal trade agreements that included rights protections. Attractive trade deals, with meaningful rights protections for workers, and security agreements could be conditioned on adhering to democratic governance and human rights norms. Democracy already comes with benefits. While autocracies have generally fostered conflict, economic stagnation, or kleptocracy, as evidenced in multiple academic studies, including the work of the Nobel Prize-winning economist Daron Acemoglu, democratic institutions reliably yield economic growth. 

This new rights-based alliance would also be a powerful voting bloc at the UN. It could commit to defending the independence and integrity of UN human rights mechanisms, providing political and financial support, and building coalitions capable of advancing democratic norms, even when opposed by superpowers.

Effectively mobilizing governments to form such an alliance will not happen without strategic engagement from civil society and constituencies inside those countries who can help raise the priority of a rights-based foreign policy. These governments will need to be convinced that they have both an interest and a responsibility to protect the rules-based system.

Projects of this nature are bubbling up. Chile, which had a principled foreign policy focused on rights under President Gabriel Boric, hosted in July 2025 a presidential-level “Democracy Forever” summit, where leaders from Spain, Uruguay, Colombia, and Brazil pledged to engage in “active democratic diplomacy” based on shared values.

The Hague Group, led by Malaysia, South Africa, and Colombia, formed in January 2025 in “defense of international law” and in solidarity with Palestinians. Over 70 countries from all regions signed a joint statement defending multilateralism at the UN. Earlier, in 2017, former Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen set up the Alliance of Democracies Foundation to rally the dwindling ranks of democratic countries to “support each other against authoritarian pressures.”

Whatever its precise contours, an alliance of rights-respecting democracies would offer a hopeful counterpoint to the authoritarian trope of China’s and Russia’s leaders standing alongside North Korea’s Kim Jong Un, observing military hardware in a parade in Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in September. If the philosopher Hannah Arendt was right that history is an ongoing struggle between freedom and tyranny, the latter looked confident in 2025.

Yet, even in the worst of times, the idea of freedom and human rights is enduring. People power remains an engine for change. In the US, “No Kings” marches have drawn millions, protesters in Chicago, Minneapolis, Los Angeles, and around the country have stood up against the deployment of the National Guard and ICE abuses, and students are still organizing for Palestine on university campuses despite draconian crackdowns and visa revocations.

Buoyed by popular resistance, South Korean parliamentarians impeached their president to prevent him from grabbing power through martial law. Grassroots aid efforts by Sudan’s emergency response rooms, Hong Kong’s fire relief, Sri Lanka’s cyclone relief community kitchens, and Ukrainian mutual aid and solidarity collectives represent the best of this trend.

In 2025, Gen Z protests against corruption, inadequate public services, and poor governance in Nepal, Indonesia, and Morocco brought to the forefront the need for governments to listen to their youth and tackle corruption and inequality. But as the difficulties of restoring rights in Bangladesh after years under an authoritarian government illustrates, gains won through public mobilization can easily be lost unless democratic participation and free expression remain unassailable.